DISQUS

Dear "Whatever": Some people are too stupid to even try to debate them. Don't waste your time on Freedom Fries.

" Or else, to use the leftist arguement, shut up."

Bill O'Reilly is a leftist?

And the word "argument", you right wing ignoramus.

"We only get rabid Libs and other assorted moonbats praising his defection."

Inference: you don't exist.

"You outed yourself, Terror boi. If your terrorist heroes were justified in attacking the USA for "revenge" then any and all past and future repraisals against Muslims is also justified as revenge for the innumerable terror attacks by Muslims."

Fundamental logic error. To point out someone's motivations is not to condone them.

"You're either with us or you're with the terrorists."

Intellectual purity is fundamental dogma of the right. It might work better if the weren't wrong about so much. (Of course, that intellectual purity is a major reason why they ARE wrong about so much.)

"Johnson is out to save America from people who believe science might be able to demonstrate life isn't a huge cosmic accident. "

Given how abominably ignorant Americans are about science, especially the theory of evolution, that's a noble cause.

"He may yet be the new Andrew Sullivan."

One can only hope for that much enlightenment.

No need to.

Like anything else, there's a bell curve distribution of wingnuttery.

"First of all the work "accused "implies you're be called something negative. "

Look, as an atheist, I'm smart enough to understand that saying that a Sunday school teacher and deacon of her church doesn't believe in the thing she professes is a negative; it's an accusation. It's absurdly thick-headed to deny it.

"To say that Kay was "harmed" by being called an atheist implies that it is wrong to be an atheist."

No, it doesn't, any more than to say that Obama was harmed by being called a socialists implies that it is wrong to be a socialist. What it means is that these views aren't popular, and so being called that hurts them at the polls -- that's an objective fact.

He said it was "faintly sleazy". The only one engaging in hyperbole is you.

"BTW: Chelsea Clinton is not ugly but Janet Reno certainly is."

She's not nearly as ugly as your soul is.

"Get off your high horse and be honest...we've all told jokes or laughed at them that were in bad taste. Nothing mean or evil was intended behind it."

Is there a molecule in your body that isn't dishonest?

A Republican calling someone else "shameful" is the ultimate in hypocrisy. And since when is simply quoting someone making them "fair game"?

It sounds like Ms. Victor really is a b***h.

"How could Ruppert and company be so hypocritical? These are the people who are supposed to be so morally grounded!"

Supposed by whom? Rupert, like most right wingers, doesn't have a moral bone in his body.

"How could Ruppert and company be so hypocritical? These are the people who are supposed to be so morally grounded!"

Supposed by whom? Rupert, like most right wingers, doesn't have a moral bone in his body.

"Anyone see the hypocrisy here?"

Yes, we see it on Fox News -- duh.

"Anyone see the hypocrisy here?"

Yes, we see it on Fox News -- duh.

My gut says, "No".

There's a word for people who depend on their "gut" for information: ignoramuses.

My gut says, "No".

There's a word for people who depend on their "gut" for information: ignoramuses.

There's too much web commentary, especially about the obvious.

"The RFK Jr says that the hurricane is pay back to Haley Barbour"

Uh, excuse me, but are you and Richard just plain stupid? He said no such thing; what he said was that, if you think like Pat Robertson, then perhaps this is something to consider -- the underlying points are a) Robertson and those who think like him are hypocritical morons b) on a moral or karmic level, not on the level of thinking that God shares Pat's views, there's something ironic about Barbour being a victim here (but RFK Jr. added this update: "Alas, the reprieve for New Orleans was only temporary. But Haley Barbour still has much to answer for.")