http://disqus.com/people/43019d61aee011f7ed2abd4af1524fcb/enSat, 17 Nov 2007 00:42:59 -0000http://dria.disqus.com/taming_the_firehose_redux/#comment-1567925Zookeeper Weekly<br><br>Basically we have all these animal names and codenames, "Gecko", "Firefox", "[Thunder]Bird", "Songbird", "SeaMonkey" just to name a few of the more prominent. ;-)CallekThu, 08 Nov 2007 19:42:38 -0000http://dria.disqus.com/writer8217s_strike/#comment-1567931wow, that is a terrific and informative blog; thanks for the referral!CallekSat, 17 Nov 2007 00:42:59 -0000http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_android_we_want_developers_but8230/#comment-9693595"...doesn’t understand how to pitch end users and developers at the same time (developers only really come after end users do anyway, look again at the iPhone)."<br><br>And yet, even this statement is missing the point. Developers are users too, they just think slightly differently. ;-)<br><br>The problem lies in the fact that you have to make a developer want the device for themselves, and then to have the [coinciding] desire to write their code/application for that device.<br><br>There is a less-common desire to write your code/application for a device others use but you don't; which while entirely true in some cases, does *only* follow end-users and even then not always, and is much more infrequent than the first case.CallekTue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:41 -0000