<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Julian</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/4208f6b083ebfd8f604e50860ad3c1be/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:32:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Drop the &amp;#8220;www&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/it8217s_time_to_drop_the_8220www8221/#comment-4354912</link><description>I think www is still useful, for example in google you can look for pages in &lt;a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.example.com&lt;/a&gt;. But when there's just &lt;a href="http://example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;example.com&lt;/a&gt; it will search &lt;a href="http://forums.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;forums.example.com&lt;/a&gt;, too.&lt;br&gt;And the hierarchy thing is important, too. If you seperate traffic to lets say &lt;a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.example.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://media.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;media.example.com&lt;/a&gt; and so on you can speed up your site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Django and Relativity Updated</title><link>http://cogit8.disqus.com/django_and_relativity_updated/#comment-9121653</link><description>Why is eliminating symlinks good? If I symlink your app into my project, wouldn't it be bad if it still uses it's real location?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 04:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Local Django Sprint, Berlin, Germany, August 08, 2008</title><link>http://jannisleidel.disqus.com/local_django_sprint_berlin_germany_august_08_2008/#comment-13856363</link><description>How's such a sprint going to work?&lt;br&gt;Does everyone just attend and work on what they want?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Problem With Django</title><link>http://metajack.disqus.com/the_problem_with_django/#comment-4568083</link><description>James, I think you still have the perception that Django needs to be ready for a release.&lt;br&gt;What many people are saying now is, that Django will never be really ready for a release. It's a young project and in heavy development. That 90% of Django world is running on trunk which should be a development version with the latest features, that might not work fully, is surely not a good thing.&lt;br&gt;Always talking about 1.0 does not help. It just distracts from the real problem. And what happens after 1.0? Do you keep telling us that 2.0 is not ready?&lt;br&gt;Django has a problem and it doesn't seem to be admitted by the core people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lighttpd with Apache</title><link>http://inerciasensorial.disqus.com/lighttpd_with_apache/#comment-4058406</link><description>Why don't just use lighty directly, I mean specifying all links with port 81? Would that be bad?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:52:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lighttpd with Apache</title><link>http://inerciasensorial.disqus.com/lighttpd_with_apache/#comment-4058407</link><description>That's why I made it port 8080 now ;)&lt;br&gt;Works like a charm with lighty, and now one looks at the URLs anyways.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Authenticating Using Email vs Username</title><link>http://djangoaware.disqus.com/authenticating_using_email_vs_username/#comment-4495006</link><description>Q: What if user changes its main email address someday? &lt;br&gt;A: He logs in with that address.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Time to Drop the &amp;#8220;www&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/it8217s_time_to_drop_the_8220www8221/#comment-11163285</link><description>I think www is still useful, for example in google you can look for pages in &lt;a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.example.com&lt;/a&gt;. But when there's just &lt;a href="http://example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;example.com&lt;/a&gt; it will search &lt;a href="http://forums.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;forums.example.com&lt;/a&gt;, too.&lt;br&gt;And the hierarchy thing is important, too. If you seperate traffic to lets say &lt;a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.example.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://media.example.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;media.example.com&lt;/a&gt; and so on you can speed up your site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:42:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Things I Hate About Django.</title><link>http://usware.disqus.com/five_things_i_hate_about_django/#comment-16047310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lack of GROUP BY in the ORM!!! This is driving me nuts... why isn't that included???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for newforms with variable number of fields.. yes you can generate the class programatically... but compared to how easy Django makes other things.. that is just crappy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:36:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finer Things in Mac, From cleversimon.

 The great thing about this is...</title><link>http://finermac.disqus.com/finer_things_in_mac_from_cleversimon_the_great_thing_about_this_is/#comment-17740467</link><description>I think it&amp;amp;#039;s just a formatting thing, you don&amp;amp;#039;t invent the display format &amp;amp;quot;byte/bytes&amp;amp;quot; in the copy dialog. You would have it defined only once and correct and reuse it everywhere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:32:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>