<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for joecab</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/40c085d533b224e2898bef5399befd79/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:36:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How To Hack Firefox</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/how_to_hack_firefox/#comment-1882207</link><description>Twenty years?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To be fair, I would only count the four or so years Firefox was on the scene. Netscape seemed for all intents and purposes abandoned after IE took over, so nobody wanted to even touch it. It wasn't until FF came around to be a real alternative to IE (and people either got fed up with IE or realized they didn't HAVE to use it) that they started seeing real growth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:19:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Picture&amp;#8217;s Worth 100M Users???</title><link>http://johnlillyblog.disqus.com/a_picture8217s_worth_100m_users/#comment-1418611</link><description>Seems to me that Apple may tweak Microsoft's nose every now and then, there are some places they're too chicken to mess with them: browsers and the Office suite</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:09:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh For The Love Of God!</title><link>http://theangrydrunk.disqus.com/oh_for_the_love_of_god/#comment-7040709</link><description>Paranoid little me says this was Apple's plan all along, because if they started off by offering Safari in the update window as an alternative, people would bitch and moan about that as well, and they'd have no lesser evil to go back to aside from removing it all together. You can't ever underestimate the public's ability for misplaced indignation and stupidity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On The iPhone 3G Pricing</title><link>http://theangrydrunk.disqus.com/thoughts_on_the_iphone_3g_pricing/#comment-7040750</link><description>Which is also one of the arguments Mac users have used on people who say Windows is cheaper: long term, when you add in stuff like virus software (and sometimes cards for video, sound or networking), and put a price on your time solving problems, you'll probably be better off with a Mac.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I've never understood this line of thinking. it's like people who tell you to adjust your withholding so that you're not giving the government a free loan just to get a rebate check when you file. Most people would blow that money if they were receiving it amortized over a year; get it in a lump sum and you're much more likely to do something a little more constructive with it, like put it away or pay down some debt.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On The iPhone 3G Pricing</title><link>http://theangrydrunk.disqus.com/thoughts_on_the_iphone_3g_pricing/#comment-7040752</link><description>Oops -- I was agreeing :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why are some bloggers turning on Apple?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_are_some_bloggers_turning_on_apple/#comment-9696891</link><description>It's just bound to happen as Apple grows in popularity and mindset. And this is true for anybody: the more tech you put in your devices, the more ways things may go wrong. It's the price of advancement as Apple strives to be more cutting edge than anyone else. And what was said above is true: people almost never switch from Mac to Windows, and that speaks volumes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the more interesting argument is how Apple is handling customer service when problems do pop up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:23:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You are an idiot if&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/you_are_an_idiot_if8230/#comment-9708290</link><description>Pardon my ignorance, but why COULDN'T they do a complete rewrite with a rock-solid emulator for older apps? That's part of what worked in Apple's favor: don't break older apps but still set them off in their own little neighborhood to gradually wean people off them and point them to a brighter future. It'll work, but again, we're talking ROCK SOLID for this to succeed. Isn't it better to make this transition by choice rather than out of desperation like Apple had to?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You are an idiot if&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/you_are_an_idiot_if8230/#comment-9708299</link><description>Then unless MS does something super risky like start a brand-new OS alongside Windows that's tempting enough to start getting people (especially cutting edge users) to transition over, I dunno what they can do. Apple is going through another coding rewrite for efficiency with Snow Leopard which will I assume be Intel only, rewrite anything still using more Carbon code than it should (*cough*Finder*cough*), and speed things up across the board. It's not anywhere near as radical as going from OS 9 to OS X but it sure seems like something you need to do every few years to stay competitive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hog Bay Software - WriteRoom.iPhone $4.99 sales compared to giving...</title><link>http://hogbaysoftwareblog.disqus.com/hog_bay_software_writeroomiphone_499_sales_compared_to_giving/#comment-15477386</link><description>I didn't even realize you had a free offer this weekend. Didn't see it mentioned in any of my usual feeds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I did buy it today for 99¢ after Chairman Gruber's mention.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:32:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.inc.com/the-breakthrough-company/2008/04/vista_still_sucks.html</title><link>http://inc.disqus.com/httpbloginccomthe_breakthrough_company200804vista_still_suckshtml/#comment-16450788</link><description>What re you talking about? You have plenty of choices. You can buy something besides a Dell. You can go back to XP. You can switch to Macintosh or Linux.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you bemoan the lack of choices out there because you really DON'T want to switch at all, so don't go looking for sympathy from any of us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:12:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who needs BlendTec for your iPhone, when you can use a washing machine?</title><link>http://rachellevy.disqus.com/who_needs_blendtec_for_your_iphone_when_you_can_use_a_washing_machine/#comment-17037263</link><description>Yep. When something electronic like a cell gets wet, you're supposed to pack it in uncooked rice. That will really suck out the water. But an iPhone is a lot more solid than a typical cell so I'm not sure how well it would work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Powerbook Pismo Turns 10 Years Old</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/my_powerbook_pismo_turns_10_years_old/#comment-17205250</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can relate: my "WallStreet" PowerBook is still going strong and it's about the same age. I've never bothered with the heavy duty upgrades on it; just RAM and hard drive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:44:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Powerbook Pismo Turns 10 Years Old</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/my_powerbook_pismo_turns_10_years_old/#comment-17627418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can relate: my "WallStreet" PowerBook is still going strong and it's about the same age. I've never bothered with the heavy duty upgrades on it; just RAM and hard drive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:44:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedailywhat.disqus.com/the_daily_what_36135/#comment-17733623</link><description>Oh, they just have to pretend it's a big deal to make it look like they're taking the matter seriously to prevent any further overreaaction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still don't get why putting V-chips in TVs is mandatory here yet you can't curse. Either let people say what they want and concerned parents can still lock it out for their kids, or remove the chip and end this idiocy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:36:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Safari AdBlock on Snow Leopard</title><link>http://martinottenwaelter.disqus.com/google_bersetzer/#comment-15745558</link><description>He's offering this for free, and you're whining and saying people will ditch him without 64-bit support.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are truly a class act.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joecab</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>