<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Eric S.</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/409d07c68ad28ffbcf9e285a203a2a1b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:12:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Contest: MacWorld Announcement Predictions</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/contest_macworld_announcement_predictions/#comment-1465635</link><description>1.  iTunes Movie Rentals&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  iBook Touch&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.  Steve Jobs has a new outfit</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ASK: Creating a great resume</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/ask_creating_a_great_resume/#comment-1465702</link><description>PDF is nice, but I've had MANY recruiters, application systems, and managers ask for a Word DOC resume ONLY.  So, I'm afraid we all have to dust off our skillz and make sure change tracking is disabled and all changes have been "accepted."  Here's a good summary on the issue:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.shaunakelly.com/word/trackchanges/HowTrackChangesWorks.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.shaunakelly.com/word/trackchanges/Ho...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You'll also need to make sure you've got good TXT versions of your resume and cover letter available - many automated systems will only accept this format, and we've all seen what copied text looks like coming out of Word.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:20:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introduction Opportunity</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/introduction_opportunity/#comment-1465772</link><description>Can I be so honored as to be the inspiration for one of The Community Guy's blog posts, since I just got intro'ed by him to someone else myself?  I wonder if that can get me some extra google juice... :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The agency model is now officially broken</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/the_agency_model_is_now_officially_broken/#comment-1465813</link><description>Excellent concept - lets take it to the next step:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* What about email vendors?  Isn't email just one (perhaps the primary) channel for communication within a community, or a method of invitation to JOIN the community?  Doesn't this put traditional email vendors focused on a campaign model at a distinct disadvantage?  Where's the focus on behavioral-triggered emails or user-generated communication?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* How about traditionally-oriented IT departments?  While I definitely believe there are some excellent and well-adapted IT teams at work today, doesn't a focus on community completely blow the traditional Waterfall method of application development... well... out of the water?  How can a site adapt to the technical needs and wants of an organic and changing community without a more agile development model?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* And finally, could there be community implications that affect the traditional model of retail?  Seth Godin &lt;a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/01/music-lessons.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;has been on a tear&lt;/a&gt; of late about the record industry's woes, and now Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails are releasing records independently. Etsy and CafePress gain traction by offering micro-retail models, and auction sites let the community even determine the value of the goods being sold!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems like your concept of traditional models going out of vogue sparked off a lot of ideas with me!  Great post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:23:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retooling CommunityGuy.com</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/retooling_communityguycom/#comment-1465795</link><description>Sad fact:  I immediately switched over to IE6 to see how it looked there, too.  Man I'm ready for a standards-accepting web world!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:12:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>