<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Mark</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/3e0b1656d29a1ac57a2b67d3dfbf335c/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:13:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Six years of blogging</title><link>http://fammanlib.disqus.com/six_years_of_blogging/#comment-340514</link><description>Rock on, Steve!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congrats. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:55:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: What motivates you to comment on a post (or not)?</title><link>http://fammanlib.disqus.com/poll_what_motivates_you_to_comment_on_a_post_or_not/#comment-375992</link><description>You might want to mention that it is only available on the main page, not the post page. I didn't find it the 1st time 2 days ago.  Also, it looks like it needs a math lesson as it said one choice had 100% with 3 votes and another had 33% with 1. Huh?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I installed that link checking plug-in you mentioned a few weeks back a couple of days ago and so far it has found 697 broken links. Gah!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Applying new lipstick on an old pig</title><link>http://fammanlib.disqus.com/applying_new_lipstick_on_an_old_pig/#comment-981322</link><description>I was a tad excited about those persistent URLS until I actually saw my first.  They are about as ugly as a URL to a page on the ALA site.  And who in their right mind would ever consider typing one?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Losing librarianship?</title><link>http://fammanlib.disqus.com/losing_librarianship/#comment-4678279</link><description>Steve, here's one that might be relevant to you: &lt;a href="http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also have another in mind but can't think of it at the moment.  Will try to come back and suggest it if/when I remember.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try not to think of it as losing librarianship but as helping to bring us into the world of search and taxonomy; you know, where we "supposedly" are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:44:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Losing librarianship?</title><link>http://fammanlib.disqus.com/losing_librarianship/#comment-4730309</link><description>Ah yes, here's the other one: &lt;a href="http://thenoisychannel.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thenoisychannel.com/&lt;/a&gt;  The Noisy Channel by the "chief scientist" at Endeca.  Some good stuff now and again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>