<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Josiah St. John</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/3e02a0e51dd385a9b0f9abcb5b64f3d1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:56:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Abandon Hope</title><link>http://itf.disqus.com/abandon_hope/#comment-1279095</link><description>Omega Man is alright... as long as you don't view it as an adaptation of I am Legend. That said, I'm going to be really disappointed if this version isn't at least reasonably faithful to the book. It's a shame cos Johnny Depp is ideal as the hero, much better casting than Charlton Heston.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the plus side, at least we won't have Arnold Schwarzenegger in the lead role, as was mooted back in the 90s when this adaptation was first mooted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh well, I guess we'll just have to wait another thirty years before the next film version is made, hopefully that'll be better. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josiah St. John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 03:05:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bean &lt;I&gt;is&lt;/I&gt; The Hitcher</title><link>http://itf.disqus.com/bean_iisi_the_hitcher/#comment-1279072</link><description>Sean Bean's casting doesn't matter to me. But like you, I don't honestly see the point of a remake of The Hitcher. How can anyone hope to even come close Rutger Hauer's absolutely stunning and iconic performance in the original?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josiah St. John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 03:08:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bean &lt;I&gt;is&lt;/I&gt; The Hitcher</title><link>http://itf.disqus.com/bean_iisi_the_hitcher/#comment-1279077</link><description>They are doing *what*??? Remaking The Birds? How can anyone even begin to think that a remake of The Birds is a good idea? Honestly, I've heard it all now...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josiah St. John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Abandon Hope</title><link>http://itf.disqus.com/abandon_hope/#comment-1279097</link><description>Yeah, I guess that I'm holding out for a TV mini-series or something. It's a bit sad that there's never been a good film/TV adaptation of what is one of the best and most important horror/sci-fi novels ever written.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, it vies with 'Do androids dream of electric sheep?' for the coveted 'Josiah St. John Best Title Award'. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josiah St. John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:34:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Keynote: Response</title><link>http://itf.disqus.com/apple_keynote_response/#comment-1279108</link><description>Good article as ever, thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A couple of things strike me. Firstly, I'm a long-term Linux user, it's by far my favourite OS. However, I have a soft spot for Macs, which I always think of as having most of the advantages of Linux together with a GUI that's second to none.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing that struck me is that when I first switched to Linux I had much the same reaction that you did as regards virtual desktops. They quickly came to be an indispensable part of the way I worked--I now organise my desktops so that I have my PIM stuff on one, browsers on another, work on another and any terminals or stuff like that on a fourth. It keeps things very clean. It's a feature that Windows is in desperate need of (it's not the only thing Windows is in desperate need of!!).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can see how the concept of the virtual desktop is less necessary on the Mac because of the way the desktop is set up; however, it's definitely worth giving them a spin for a couple of weeks to see if they help at all. I honestly can't work effectively without them nowadays!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Time Machine sounds like it will go quite a few steps beyond what MS were trying to do with WinFS (which sounded more like a beefed up version of Linux's ReiserFS than anything) and I hope it'll set a standard that others will follow. That said, I expect MS to continue with their terrible System Restore programme for the foreseeable future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have issues with Mac's Mail programme--not in terms of the interface. Things like the Todo lists are very welcome--and a step in the right direction. For too long PIMs haven't had functionality like this which I regard as pretty basic. I have issues with the format they store the email in. That said, that's not a complaint directed solely at Apple, MS do the same (only worse).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Oliver, I remember when 10.4 came out and I thought much the same as you do--that it was more like a big update with a couple of new features rather than a true upgrade. It was only after I'd been using it for a couple of months and i went back to a computer running 10.3 that I realising just how much had improved and how dependent I'd become on the features. I expect 10.5 to follow much the same pattern: be an essential upgrade masquerading as a minor update. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josiah St. John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Me And My Blog: 12 Months Of Blogging</title><link>http://itf.disqus.com/me_and_my_blog_12_months_of_blogging/#comment-1279179</link><description>One day you should probably give writing fiction a go! It's a lot of fun. Not that I ever write fiction, you understand...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congrats on your first anniversary!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josiah St. John</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Review: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning</title><link>http://itf.disqus.com/movie_review_the_texas_chainsaw_massacre_the_beginning/#comment-1279212</link><description>You make me all the more happy that I've been sutdious avoiding this film since its release.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've no problems with remakes (the Vincent Price remake of the House of Wax is a great example of how a remake can go well), but the remake of TCM was pointless and this sequel just got me worried that they were just trying to milk a cash cow while killing the cow at the same time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josiah St. John</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>