<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RDM</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/3d271d071ae2ffd24ee173de5f2bfaad/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:05:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rethinking Nature Writing (in Los Angeles)</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/rethinking_nature_writing_in_los_angeles/#comment-17473842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To dismiss LA as a nature-free wasteland is to ignore the stunning backdrop of the San Gabriel Mountains, arguably the most accessible wilderness in the lower 48.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sadly, most Angelenos barely notice their natural bounty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RDM</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:18:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the Swiffer Eco-Friendly?</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/is_the_swiffer_eco_friendly/#comment-17497112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have yet to read on this post or the links that Swiffer contains any toxic chemicals. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't dismiss the water-savings of regular swiffing versus regular mopping so easily. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think this posting went a bit too far in criticizing Zaccai without providing much evidence to refute him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RDM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:05:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1.2 MegaWatts: World's Largest Tidal Turbine To Be Installed</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/12_megawatts_worlds_largest_tidal_turbine_to_be_installed/#comment-17509352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a big fan of tidal power: No carbon, no nuclear waste, no toxic photovoltaic cells, and far less destructive than damming a river for hydroelectricity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I can see how these turbines might result in chopped-up whale meat. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would prefer study of environmental impact compared to an assurance like "I think they can swim fast enough." Birds are pretty fast, and they get chopped up by wind turbines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wind turbine on top might not be a bad touch, but I truly doubt they could get another 1.2 megawatts that way. I doubt they could even add another 1% of that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, because tidal turbines work only half the day (when tides are moving), complementing this with wind power is smart.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RDM</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:33:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>