<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/3b23d4016a6fbdf688ad477a352d4536/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:40:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The other side of the coin &amp;#8211; Good one by an Infy guy..!</title><link>http://cliquee.disqus.com/the_other_side_of_the_coin_8211_good_one_by_an_infy_guy/#comment-21348397</link><description>The points made are absolutely correct and I had similar feeling when I wrote the following&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://iamcozithink.blogspot.com/2007/03/woolmer-dead.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://iamcozithink.blogspot.com/2007/03/woolme...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macs are even more expensive than I thought (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/macs_are_even_more_expensive_than_i_thought_scripting_news/#comment-4324160</link><description>you can always try &lt;a href="mailto:sjobs@apple.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;sjobs@apple.com&lt;/a&gt; - ive tried it, leave your phone number and his personal assistant will call you the next day</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:37:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WRDU Goes Country</title><link>http://raleighing.disqus.com/wrdu_goes_country/#comment-11818234</link><description>96Rock Sucks Period, 106.1 should have been turned into a modern rock station and not another country station!  Now this area has three country stations, one top 40 station and one rock station that plays old music non stop and 90's grunge non stop!&lt;br&gt;I think 96Rock is trying to hold on to the older demographics since terrestrial radio is on the decline due to SIRIUS and XM Radio!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:15:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Skeet On Mischa</title><link>http://skeetonmischa.disqus.com/skeet_on_mischa_15/#comment-228597</link><description>Everyone loves Bree, dude. She's America's new sweetheart.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RIP, Dan Fogelberg</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/rip_dan_fogelberg/#comment-39132</link><description>Dan Fogelberg died yesterday, yeah, most people have heard the news. I was a fan of his, and I was sorry to hear of his recent passing away. Goodbye Dan Fogelberg, we will miss you...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN's Ed Henry tries to explain his "interaction" with Obama (because only 40 million people saw it)</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/cnns_ed_henry_tries_to_explain_his_interaction_with_obama_because_only_40_million_people_saw_it/#comment-7516067</link><description>This country gave much less scrutiny to Bush's decision to invade Iraq than to Obama's strategy to get us out of the economic hole we're in.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh yeah, that question about Racism---that was embarrassing; I winced when the reporter asked it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Texas reaches for the dark ages, again</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/texas_reaches_for_the_dark_ages_again/#comment-7516129</link><description>Next month they're taking up an amendment to challenge the Theory of Gravity.  Nobody really knows what it is and it was that &lt;i&gt;Jew&lt;/i&gt; Einstein that made the claim about Gravity and the warping of Space-Time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Krugman is still at it</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/krugman_is_still_at_it/#comment-7516198</link><description>I have to say that it's tough to make a call.  On one hand, Krugman is one very smart guy but, unlike Obama, he isn't constrained:: the WH is shackled by political considerations.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drug tests for welfare recipients?  What about bailout recipients?</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/drug_tests_for_welfare_recipients_what_about_bailout_recipients/#comment-7546158</link><description>Obama is letting states decide about Medical Marijuana.  The DEA is no longer raiding dispensaries in California and that is a big deal. If it works for him,  I'd much rather have my neighbor who suffers from chronic pain using marijuana than using vicodin, oxycontin, or other opiate-containing drug..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin says McCain's campaign staff was unworthy of prayer</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/palin_says_mccains_campaign_staff_was_unworthy_of_prayer/#comment-7546256</link><description>Meant no disrespect to McCain?  Oh yeah...right....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if you offered a budget that had no numbers in it?</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/what_if_you_offered_a_budget_that_had_no_numbers_in_it/#comment-7568903</link><description>The GOP is so scared of Rush's wrath they would rather look like bozos than be seen  working with the Dems.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U.S. Representative Michelle Bachmann wants a revolution</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/us_representative_michelle_bachmann_wants_a_revolution/#comment-7569977</link><description>Fundie nutcase. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Bachman" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Bachman&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: UPS stops advertising on O'Reilly after he had ThinkProgress blogger stalked, and talked about assassinating MSNBC employees</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/breaking_ups_stops_advertising_on_oreilly_after_he_had_thinkprogress_blogger_stalked_and_talked_abou/#comment-7574664</link><description>O'Reilly could've just called Ms. Terkel up.  Instead he deliberately tries to terrorize her because she's a woman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Advertisers ought to be nervous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:57:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Redoubt keeps erupting</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/redoubt_keeps_erupting/#comment-7614897</link><description>Jindal's  willing to screw Louisianans  to run for President and he's willing to put us all at greater risk of disaster just to make himself look like a good conservative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His ambition is clearly in conflict with his responsibilities as governor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He should resign or promise not to run for higher office.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:26:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama FIRED the head of GM</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/obama_fired_the_head_of_gm/#comment-7638113</link><description>I don't see what all the fuss is about.  If these companies get financial help from the US Govt then the Govt has every right to act in it's own interest to protect it's investment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Business doesn't like  the terms then they can leave the money on the table.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:32:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huge computer virus may hit tomorrow, April 1</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/huge_computer_virus_may_hit_tomorrow_april_1/#comment-7681762</link><description>The 60 minutes interview totally missed an important point:  Why does Symantec have to provide security updates every *day*?   We are supposed to accept the idea that computers are inherently vulnerable to computer  viruses and worms?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose I'm not surprised since neither Leslie Stahl nor the Symantec guy bothered to note that Mac OS X and Linux are unaffected.  Windows spokesmen, if they do, usually make the limp claim that other operating systems aren't targeted because they don't have the market share---yeah, FUD you.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bar is pretty low for MS Windows users....you wouldn't know how low unless you normally used Linux or Mac OS X.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huge computer virus may hit tomorrow, April 1</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/huge_computer_virus_may_hit_tomorrow_april_1/#comment-7686019</link><description>I don't believe that's true.  Two of the variants of conflickr spread by exploiting an unpatched vulnerability one of the components of the operating system--the uninfected computer inadvertantly trusts the data it gets from the infected computer.  It doesn't matter whether one had admin privs or not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:47:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iowa Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriages</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/iowa_supreme_court_rules_in_favor_of_same_sex_marriages/#comment-7794428</link><description>Massachusetts was an anomaly.  California was an exception.  But Iowa can only be a trend.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Axelrod blasts Cheney - why is al Qaeda still around after 8 years?</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/axelrod_blasts_cheney_why_is_al_qaeda_still_around_after_8_years/#comment-7915348</link><description>Q: Why is al Qaeda still around?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A: The Iraq War.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheney is such a Dick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What else would a baker in Turkey produce?</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/what_else_would_a_baker_in_turkey_produce/#comment-7968879</link><description>This guy, Obama, is very smart.  He did more for National Security by talking about working with the Muslim world than Bush ever did with all the US Armed Forces.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mom kills son, then self at shooting range</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/mom_kills_son_then_self_at_shooting_range/#comment-8014939</link><description>At the very least can't this country demand that every gun carry insurance?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:28:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mark Sanford and Son</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/mark_sanford_and_son/#comment-8023857</link><description>I gotta wonder what it must feel like to be a Carolinian listening to Sanford's soft and creepy voice  tell me it's government's fault when I lose my job and health insurance and face foreclosure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:57:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Arizona State refuses Obama honorary degree. Says he hasn't accomplished enough in life.</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/arizona_state_refuses_obama_honorary_degree_says_he_hasnt_accomplished_enough_in_life/#comment-8027447</link><description>Yeah, you know you haven't made it 'till you have an Honorary from ASU.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:44:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The fundies are po'd at Rick Warren</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/the_fundies_are_pod_at_rick_warren/#comment-8098007</link><description>If it baffles the Concerned Women for America then whatever Ric Warren is doing is the right thing to do.  Keep it up, Ric!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:23:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN's Susan Roesgen:  Teabagging is "a party for Obama bashers" and "highly promoted by the right-wing conservative network Fox"</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/cnns_susan_roesgen_teabagging_is_a_party_for_obama_bashers_and_highly_promoted_by_the_right_wing_con/#comment-8250737</link><description>I haven't chuckled  this much sense a Ross Perot for President rally.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:10:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Savage: "rogue homosexual elements within Homeland Security are engaging in extra-constitutional activity"</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/savage_rogue_homosexual_elements_within_homeland_security_are_engaging_in_extra_constitutional_activ/#comment-8250875</link><description>The GOP has become a name-calling, anger-provoking  radio talk show these days.  No wonder Savage is up there with the...ahem....best and brightest of the Republican Party.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Progressive - I Can’t Like Bobby Jindal</title><link>http://progressive.disqus.com/the_progressive_i_cant_like_bobby_jindal_24/#comment-517346</link><description>As an Indian having graduated from Louisiana, Bobby Jindal's achievements are beyond incredible. Most of the authors article is very accurate and the constitution protects Mr. Jindals right to freedom of religion as it does everyone else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:23:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Australian Federal Election - Preferred Party Poll #1</title><link>http://mythor.disqus.com/australian_federal_election_preferred_party_poll_1/#comment-1942313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One important reason why PM John Howard should not remain in office is his unfair harsh workplace reforms. Under his fantastic new WorkChoices legislation, the average worker has the choice to either earn less money, or work more hours. Now that's a great choice, isn't it?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:10:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mikheil Chiaureli - Padeniye Berlina (Падение Берлина) aka The Fall of Berlin (1949)</title><link>http://cow.disqus.com/mikheil_chiaureli_padeniye_berlina_aka_the_fall_of_berlin_1949_18/#comment-5003066</link><description>subtitles?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:18:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discussing Michael Moore's SLACKER UPRISING</title><link>http://slackeruprising.disqus.com/discussing_michael_moores_slacker_uprising/#comment-2572576</link><description>Obama will win. It's time to dethrone the the failed and false Republican philosophy and the lies that this administration propagated to the American people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beautiful Sunsets and Surise</title><link>http://collectionofphotos.disqus.com/beautiful_sunsets_and_surise/#comment-3852131</link><description>Do they have copyright?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kristen Stewart and the &amp;#8220;Retarded&amp;#8221; Quote</title><link>http://newmoonmovie.disqus.com/kristen_stewart_and_the_8220retarded8221_quote/#comment-10082229</link><description>She is not the first celebrity to go through this. She won&amp;#39;t be the last. She needs to get over herself and learn how to deal with it. Those "retarded" fans PAID to see that movie and she will be making money off of them for years to come.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:06:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kristen Stewart and the &amp;#8220;Retarded&amp;#8221; Quote</title><link>http://newmoonmovie.disqus.com/kristen_stewart_and_the_8220retarded8221_quote/#comment-6986706</link><description>She is not the first celebrity to go through this. She won't be the last. She needs to get over herself and learn how to deal with it. Those "retarded" fans PAID to see that movie and she will be making money off of them for years to come.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:06:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top-Ten Improvements For Dead Rising 2</title><link>http://aeropausegames.disqus.com/top_ten_improvements_for_dead_rising_2/#comment-6342573</link><description>the lariat spin was easy...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;hold the left thumbstick in... (L3), and press X at your leisure...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the roundabout kick their heads off thingy i found more difficult as X needs to be pressed so close to jumping...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:46:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: POSTER: GOLDEN COMPASS Nicole Kidman character foreign poster</title><link>http://shockya.disqus.com/poster_golden_compass_nicole_kidman_character_foreign_poster/#comment-9615594</link><description>Yeah there are definitely some rumours going around that Nicole Kidman is pregnant. But she refuses to comment and give us a definite answer. I guess she'll string everyone along until finally, several months later, we find out if she really has a baby on the way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:34:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://demo.rockettheme.com/jun09/blog/40-equipment/97-cras-eleifend-justo-quis-mauris-consectetur</title><link>http://refractionblog.disqus.com/thread_696/#comment-10526040</link><description>I like this, top notch work by RocketTheme as usual.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:12:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Terminator Salvation: 20 Things We Didn&amp;#8217;t Like, 10 We Did</title><link>http://filmschoolrejects.disqus.com/terminator_salvation_20_things_we_didn8217t_like_10_we_did/#comment-11436346</link><description>Most film &amp;quot;critics&amp;quot; - and you guys are trying hard to fit into that mold - are either frustrated, failed filmmakers who like to think they can do better (but can&amp;#039;t), or simply hate movies while pretending to be fans. It seems you are a bit of both. You are trying way too hard to find faults in what I consider an outstanding film that works perfectly with the world created by the previous three stories. This is an action film - a future war movie - not an intense Greek drama that requires detailed character evolution. It&amp;#039;s also science FICTION - not a documentary on how machines would act if they did in fact wage war on the human race. You need to stop hating movies and try to enjoy them. You&amp;#039;ll have a lot more fun. But then you can&amp;#039;t stand it that other people&amp;#039;s ideas are actually getting made while your ideas are, well, I guess pretty worthlesst.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:42:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interpol plans to use Microsoft's evidence extracting technology</title><link>http://techflash.disqus.com/interpol_plans_to_use_microsofts_evidence_extracting_technology/#comment-15715980</link><description>I love Linux, I hate config files...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, these "special tools" do nothing more than create a RAM dump, scan and catalog the contents of hot points such as IE history, temp directory, registry entries, email, network peers and connection history, etc... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are 10 different ways to avoid each tool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RETAIL WAR: Microsoft Cherry Picking Apple Store Employees</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/retail_war_microsoft_cherry_picking_apple_store_employees/#comment-17106580</link><description>Apple Employees are not being recruited. Apple employees are reaching out and applying. It pays more, and recently Apple's treatment of employees in general has been questionable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This one&amp;#8217;s on management</title><link>http://allthingsavs.disqus.com/this_one8217s_on_management/#comment-17341904</link><description>Who wrote this article? Karl Rove? I know you need to sell papers, but this sort of fear mongering is ridiculous. We're 3 games into the season. 3 games. Relax before you lose all of your journalistic credibility.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The other side of the coin &amp;#8211; Good one by an Infy guy..!</title><link>http://ekhoz.disqus.com/the_other_side_of_the_coin_8211_good_one_by_an_infy_guy/#comment-18275254</link><description>The points made are absolutely correct and I had similar feeling when I wrote the following&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://iamcozithink.blogspot.com/2007/03/woolmer-dead.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://iamcozithink.blogspot.com/2007/03/woolme...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virginia Tech Aftermath: Gun Control Twit Introduces First Bit Of Reactionary Legislation</title><link>http://sayanything.disqus.com/virginia_tech_aftermath_gun_control_twit_introduces_first_bit_of_reactionary_legislation/#comment-18984853</link><description>I loved the &amp;quot;Brady Bunch&amp;quot; when I saw it on the TV repeats, back in the 1980s. I think the show jumped the shark when the character Cousin Oliver was introduced, though. But it was still a good show, definitely a family favourite.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fogelberg 1951-2007</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>