<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Barry Welford</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/399bfb7c56cd28f6fdc73dcaa0e53bb6/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:40:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Open Web Awards &amp;#8211; Call for Nominations</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/open_web_awards_8211_call_for_nominations_30/#comment-10992540</link><description>I would like to nominate StumbleUpon &lt;a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.stumbleupon.com&lt;/a&gt; and MyBloglog &lt;a href="http://www.mybloglog.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mybloglog.com&lt;/a&gt;.  They both have active, friendly communities and through them you can easily expand your Internet horizons.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:46:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Web Awards &amp;#8211; Call for Nominations</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/open_web_awards_8211_call_for_nominations_30/#comment-12527005</link><description>I would like to nominate StumbleUpon &lt;a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.stumbleupon.com&lt;/a&gt; and MyBloglog &lt;a href="http://www.mybloglog.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mybloglog.com&lt;/a&gt;.  They both have active, friendly communities and through them you can easily expand your Internet horizons.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:46:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Post Titles After You Have Posted</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/optimizing_post_titles_after_you_have_posted_96/#comment-10993934</link><description>In fact if you use the All-in-one-SEOpack plugin for WordPress, you can independently create the Title, the Headline for your post and the post-slug used to create the URL before you even post.  More details &lt;a href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/03/write-seo-titles-for-high-rankings/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Post Titles After You Have Posted</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/optimizing_post_titles_after_you_have_posted_96/#comment-12528289</link><description>In fact if you use the All-in-one-SEOpack plugin for WordPress, you can independently create the Title, the Headline for your post and the post-slug used to create the URL before you even post.  More details &lt;a href="http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2008/03/write-seo-titles-for-high-rankings/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Post Titles After You Have Posted</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/optimizing_post_titles_after_you_have_posted_96/#comment-10993943</link><description>Following up on your advice, Daniel, I think it's best to do the research on a title before you write the post.  Often you will find that others have written on the same topic.  This may well spark ideas on other aspects you can include in your own post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Post Titles After You Have Posted</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/optimizing_post_titles_after_you_have_posted_96/#comment-12528299</link><description>Following up on your advice, Daniel, I think it's best to do the research on a title before you write the post.  Often you will find that others have written on the same topic.  This may well spark ideas on other aspects you can include in your own post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Questions For Ken Evoy of Sitesell</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/questions_for_ken_evoy_of_sitesell_43/#comment-10994410</link><description>Of course the Internet is a very crowded "Where's Waldo?" world.  So you cannot expect a magic pill like having a blog to ensure your website's visibility among the crowd.  Nor can you expect that a cookie-cutter website will do the job either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am sure SiteSell does have users that have good traffic.  However I would guess the majority of clients will be somewhat disappointed.  My question for Ken Evoy would be:&lt;br&gt;What percentage of your clients' websites achieve more than 25 visitors per day on average?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:30:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Questions For Ken Evoy of Sitesell</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/questions_for_ken_evoy_of_sitesell_43/#comment-12528742</link><description>Of course the Internet is a very crowded "Where's Waldo?" world.  So you cannot expect a magic pill like having a blog to ensure your website's visibility among the crowd.  Nor can you expect that a cookie-cutter website will do the job either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am sure SiteSell does have users that have good traffic.  However I would guess the majority of clients will be somewhat disappointed.  My question for Ken Evoy would be:&lt;br&gt;What percentage of your clients' websites achieve more than 25 visitors per day on average?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:30:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Should Nofollow Your Blog Comments?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_you_should_nofollow_your_blog_comments_05/#comment-10994541</link><description>I agree on this question of community.  I DoFollow using the basic plugin so I accept the burden of checking each post that Akismet doesn't automatically mark as spam to see whether I think it falls 'on the right side of the line'.  If there is useful comment for subsequent readers, even if minimal, and the URL isn't to an undesirable website, then I'll probably approve the comment. If someone feels I unfairly deleted their post then &lt;a href="http://www.staygolinks.com/we-dofollow-and-remove-nofollow-from-comment-links.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;my spam post policy&lt;/a&gt; encourages them to contact me directly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Should Nofollow Your Blog Comments?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_you_should_nofollow_your_blog_comments_05/#comment-12528863</link><description>I agree on this question of community.  I DoFollow using the basic plugin so I accept the burden of checking each post that Akismet doesn't automatically mark as spam to see whether I think it falls 'on the right side of the line'.  If there is useful comment for subsequent readers, even if minimal, and the URL isn't to an undesirable website, then I'll probably approve the comment. If someone feels I unfairly deleted their post then &lt;a href="http://www.staygolinks.com/we-dofollow-and-remove-nofollow-from-comment-links.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;my spam post policy&lt;/a&gt; encourages them to contact me directly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Putting the Short Tail to Work</title><link>http://makeitbloom.disqus.com/putting_the_short_tail_to_work/#comment-15356536</link><description>This looks a most useful approach, Xurxo. I thought it deserved a wider audience, so I Sphunn and Stumbled it. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search Volume Data in Google&amp;#8217;s Keyword Tool? No You&amp;#8217;re Not Dreaming!</title><link>http://makeitbloom.disqus.com/search_volume_data_in_google8217s_keyword_tool_no_you8217re_not_dreaming/#comment-15356539</link><description>I would rate this as the best news from Google this year.  Since most of us wish to have our webpages ranked highly with Google, it's great to have the data right from the horse's mouth as you might say.  Your suggestion about using it to evaluate negative words is excellent.  Thanks for that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:56:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Celebrating 2 Years of Making PPC Campaigns Bloom!</title><link>http://makeitbloom.disqus.com/celebrating_2_years_of_making_ppc_campaigns_bloom/#comment-15356548</link><description>Congratulations, Martin and Xurxo.  You've now graduated from the Terrible Twos stage.  I'm sure 2009 will be a great year for Bloom.  Best wishes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:52:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill Slawski and Kimberly Sitting in a Tree&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://utahseopro.disqus.com/bill_slawski_and_kimberly_sitting_in_a_tree8230/#comment-7233310</link><description>That's wonderful news.  Congratulations and best wishes, Bill and Kimberley.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:58:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Ways Negative Reviews Help Your Online Reputation</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/five_ways_negative_reviews_help_your_online_reputation/#comment-9421183</link><description>Some excellent points there, Andy.  I particularly liked the idea of correcting whatever points had caused problems.  You could even add a comment in response outlining exactly what was done to correct the situation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:41:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 200+ Internet Marketing Gurus on Twitter</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/200_internet_marketing_gurus_on_twitter/#comment-9422725</link><description>&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/BWelford" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/BWelford&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Internet Marketing Consultant in Langley, BC, Canada</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using &amp;#8220;Google&amp;#8221; in Place of &amp;#8220;Hypocrite&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/using_8220google8221_in_place_of_8220hypocrite8221/#comment-9423765</link><description>If Google had any sense, they would encourage the acquisition.  It's probably too high a price for Yahoo! as it exists at the moment.  In addition, it's like giving Microsoft a tar baby for those who know their Brer Rabbit stories.  Microsoft will undoubtedly do entirely the wrong things with Yahoo! if it gets its hands on it.  However on reflection it's probably no worse for Microsoft than trying to get that dead horse, Live, moving.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:34:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft and Live Search – When the Rich Get Desperate</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/microsoft_and_live_search_when_the_rich_get_desperate/#comment-9428475</link><description>So true, Alan.  I think the problem is that many people think that price or giving away discounts is a marketing lever that is easily available.  To my mind it's a two-edged sword.  Only if you're Walmart and have a real cost advantage can you use it consistently.  For the rest of us, you've got to get the price right, but stay away from it as a lever.  Your product/service must have its own attraction independent of price to really grow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barry Welford's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.strategicmarketingmontreal.ca/otherbb/2008/05/tags-attract-eyes.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tags Attract Eyes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:16:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft and Live Search – When the Rich Get Desperate</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/microsoft_and_live_search_when_the_rich_get_desperate/#comment-9428488</link><description>@Steven Balusik - What counts, Steven, is not how much effort and money Microsoft has put into pushing the new brand, Live, alongside the ongoing brand, MSN Search, but rather the perceptions that build up in the minds of potential searchers.  Even Microsofties don't seem to understand the distinction between the two brands.  All Microsoft has done is spend a great deal of money to spread confusion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barry Welford's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.strategicmarketingmontreal.ca/otherbb/2008/05/tags-attract-eyes.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tags Attract Eyes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:05:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft and Live Search – When the Rich Get Desperate</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/microsoft_and_live_search_when_the_rich_get_desperate/#comment-9428490</link><description>Steven, IMHO the problem in large organizations is often how to get Focus, Focus, Focus through consensus. If someone powerful felt it was important to keep Live a-live, then who wants to take that fight on.  Or perhaps that powerful person wanted to keep MSN around for old times sake.  After all, some dinosaurs had two brains, one at the front end and one at the back, I believe.  Perhaps one of the reasons dinosaurs died out. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barry Welford's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.strategicmarketingmontreal.ca/otherbb/2008/05/tags-attract-eyes.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tags Attract Eyes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:17:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The GYM Triangle - Strictly Business</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/the_gym_triangle_strictly_business/#comment-9429334</link><description>This is an excellent topic, Andy.  Strong competition is the best pressure on such companies to make sure they deliver their best to us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem arises when one company dominates a marketplace as Google now does.  Thankfully governments realize the problems and set up bodies such as the FTC to stop predatory practices.  Any really big company like Google must ensure that it behaves itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barry Welford's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.strategicmarketingmontreal.ca/otherbb/2008/05/twitter-brainstorming-beats-second-brain.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Twitter Beats Second Brain For Brainstorming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:57:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting the Hang of the Twitter Culture</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/getting_the_hang_of_the_twitter_culture/#comment-9436110</link><description>An excellent topic and dear to my heart.  It's essential to fit in with the culture of any social media.  You can test the boundaries a little and tap the bars of the cage, but if you just don't fit in, you're wasting everyone's time, including your own.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barry Welford's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.staygolinks.com/abu-dhabi-brand-faith-news-flash.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Abu Dhabi Brand Faith News Flash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:56:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Google &amp;#038; Twitter Need to Ditch &amp;#8220;Nofollow&amp;#8221; for All Our Sakes!</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/why_google_038_twitter_need_to_ditch_8220nofollow8221_for_all_our_sakes/#comment-9440472</link><description>An excellent topic, Andy.  I am completely against the nofollow attribute, which is being used for purposes not covered by its original creation.  Even then it was not a good idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My two alternative suggestions are most unlikely to be acceptable to the big G.&lt;br&gt;a) Forget the whole 'nofollow' bit, or&lt;br&gt;b) Accept that the big G does not cover the total Web but only that durable part of it where URLs persist.  Leave the NOW web to others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The latter is surely best for Google if it wishes to maximize its business objectives, however I think it is still going after that impossible dream.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barry Welford's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheOtherBlokesBlog/~3/mNFKECzzF-4/the-best-and-worst-in-customer-service.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Best (and Worst) In Customer Service&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:59:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media the Final Frontier of Marketing?</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/is_social_media_the_final_frontier_of_marketing/#comment-14969240</link><description>Great post, Pierre.  I loved your images that captured the evolution so well.  I think the next step may be companies being more proactive in asking how they can improve the user experience.  It's fine for a company to say "We're no worse than the other guy."  However if the other guy decides to get a great deal better, the competitors will never catch up.  That's the way a company really can grow in all senses of the word.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:30:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Customer Service Should Be in Your Social Media Marketing Strategy</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/why_customer_service_should_be_in_your_social_media_marketing_strategy/#comment-14971260</link><description>Great post, Tamar, that covers all the points.  The openness of the Internet has shifted the power.  The power is now with the people.  Those who think they have power because of their organizational position or their wealth will find that power is much less than it used to be.  It's almost like having a conscience. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:40:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You might be in the fishbowl if&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://ronamokblog.disqus.com/you_might_be_in_the_fishbowl_if8230/#comment-15484309</link><description>You might be in the FishBowl if you read all these comments. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Local in StumbleUpon</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/going_local_in_stumbleupon/#comment-16684023</link><description>I'd never thought of adopting that approach, Jake.  It's very intriguing.  The only stumbling block is the limit of 200 friends.  SU isn't really geared to help you contact those people, only to make you aware of them.  Perhaps that's the way it should be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:10:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guide to Twitter as a Tool for Marketing and PR</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/guide_to_twitter_as_a_tool_for_marketing_and_pr/#comment-17131005</link><description>Great article, Lee.  I was a doubting Thomas for quite a time.  However it has my vote, particularly if you're about to do something out of the ordinary.  Who knows in this huge Internet world may just spot it and make the link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How do you use Twitter?</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/reader_poll_how_do_you_use_twitter/#comment-17132225</link><description>One thing I find useful is trying to find an immediate solution to a pressing problem. It's always worth a try. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:49:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jason Falls Interview: Waking Up the PR Industry to Social Media</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/jason_falls_interview_waking_up_the_pr_industry_to_social_media/#comment-17133877</link><description>That's a great interview, Lee. Jason is a most engaging fellow.  You'd think it would be easy to explain how incredibly good sliced bread is but some traditionalists are almost thinking of the quill and ink days.  I'm sure this will help to spread the word.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:05:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linkbait at any Cost?</title><link>http://atomiksoapbox.disqus.com/linkbait_at_any_cost/#comment-17709249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you're willing to do anything, then undoubtedly you can start a buzz. However you reveal more about yourself in so doing, than you reveal about the buzz topic.  You're quite right, this is not the way to get attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>