<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for keith reid</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/38cd77028f43c7a27b1b877a5470090f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:13:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Andrew Baron stirs up a Twitter storm</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/andrew_baron_stirs_up_a_twitter_storm_74/#comment-331195</link><description>i must say that i find all this ridiculous. not to besmirch any reputations of the people involved but really, how gives a flying F about any of this? stirred up a "hornet's nest?" where? how big? ....hardly, in fact. maybe it's the state of the blogosphere, circa 2008 that naval gazing has becoming an obsession. guys, push away from the computer. find a girl, take a nature hike, read a book .....LIVE, for pete's sake! it's a more engaging alternative than freaking out over inconsequential BS</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">keith reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitchmeme: Do blogs deserve advertising?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/bitchmeme_do_blogs_deserve_advertising_00/#comment-356802</link><description>sorry but walens is quite right. your post is derivative and doesn't add any value. gray is quite clear about his POV</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">keith reid</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:13:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>