<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Mark Demeny</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/376f2ce23dc1caed534f19e4aa307b6e/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:32:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Canadian copyright bill: Good and bad</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/canadian_copyright_bill_good_and_bad_30/#comment-649609</link><description>This bill will make the breaking of any DRM punishable by a fine of up to $1,000,000&lt;br&gt;and 5 years in jail (C-61 Section 42). Among other things, this makes&lt;br&gt;using an iPhone illegal in Canada, despite the fact that both the&lt;br&gt;phone and service have been purchased legally. The US DMCA (upon which&lt;br&gt;this act is surely based in large part, and in many respects even more&lt;br&gt;restrictive) has had a number of cases where it has been used in fact&lt;br&gt;to restrict commerce. Cases abound where the DMCA is used for&lt;br&gt;anti-competitive means; manufacturers of printer ink and garage door&lt;br&gt;openers have been sued under the DMCA simply because the communication&lt;br&gt;method was encrypted. This is overly restrictive and anti-competitive&lt;br&gt;for both consumer choice as well as competing manufacturers. Another example was Apple restricting companies from developing apps for the iPhone&lt;br&gt;(&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/05/sap_iphone_crm/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/05/sap_iph...&lt;/a&gt; ). Anti-circumvention legislation of this draconian nature does not encourage innovation in any respect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If RIM wants to make their email handling software available for the&lt;br&gt;iPhone - who is Apple to use the DMCA to say they can't? Consumers&lt;br&gt;should be able to use their hardware however they like, and companies&lt;br&gt;should be able to provide their hardware, software and services to&lt;br&gt;competitors devices - this is what the free market is about and this bill&lt;br&gt;specifically outlaws that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, that is merely one of the effects C-61 has on innovators -&lt;br&gt;for consumers it is even worse. Quite simply it means I no longer do&lt;br&gt;the following things with my *legally purchased* media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) I can no longer watch my legally purchased UK DVDs&lt;br&gt;2) I can no longer copy my legally purchased DVDs to my iPod for&lt;br&gt;viewing while travelling&lt;br&gt;3) I cannot copy an ebook to a format to which it was not intended&lt;br&gt;(i.e. from encrypted PDF to my iPod or Blackberry)&lt;br&gt;4) I cannot use my old obsolete XBOX as a media center, as I would&lt;br&gt;have had to bypass the security on the machine to install my own&lt;br&gt;choice of software.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Demeny</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:32:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>