<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Dan</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/3720d029af74734a2e982b520b1e4b3b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:35:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The paradox of the web</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/the_paradox_of_the_web/#comment-4455924</link><description>You're just falling for the fallacy that the economy is a zero-sum game!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's the inefficient who are getting poorer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:32:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On open social data and (ab)using standards for personal gain</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/on_open_social_data_and_abusing_standards_for_personal_gain/#comment-4456138</link><description>I don't really see any huge "competitive advantage" for sites such as Facebook from "being seen to be open".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The main fear for Facebook comes from remaining closed and self-contained while a competitor such as Myspace becomes a sort of open ID for the web.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most likely, Facebook will be in a much stronger position if they are able to establish that cross-web position for themselves, but that's still a risk for them to take. Leaving that risk for Myspace to take is an even bigger risk, however...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>