<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Riaz Kanani</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/36e064af3c09278af521b0de25840ae3/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:28:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: dancing elf - viral marketing :)</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/dancing_elf_viral_marketing/#comment-1276443</link><description>lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is gmail hiding the from address in google apps spam folder?</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/is_gmail_hiding_the_from_address_in_google_apps_spam_folder/#comment-1276453</link><description>Hmm one thing Google Reader has improved is the speed with which it grabs posts. Within a few seconds I had added that it applied only to Gmail in Google Apps and not Gmail (and changed the post title). Google Reader shows the old title and content :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-1276460</link><description>Docsis 3 is the technology Virgin Media are using to achieve the 50Mbps speeds (scalable up to around 100Mbps).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-1276462</link><description>Sky have the ability to use their satellite connection to deliver large amounts of content - they can therefore get more from the 24mbps connection than the other providers can - of course they are stuck on the upstream. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; But you got me thinking further - Sky would also need to use the same ADSL 2+ connection for video on demand, which if HD quality, would chew through a lot of that bandwidth too. I had forgotten they can&amp;#039;t do VOD.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-1276464</link><description>thanks :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-1276465</link><description>Have you taken a look at Cachelogic? They cache popular content for ISPs at the edge of their network to help reduce those running costs. For me this is a better place to cache content than on the edge of content delivery networks like Akamai.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Of course I have no idea how well that can scale - but its a first step towards reducing the costs of delivering content using an IP based network.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louis gray and friendfeed</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/louis_gray_and_friendfeed/#comment-1276467</link><description>I wonder whats next :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:53:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louis gray and friendfeed</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/louis_gray_and_friendfeed/#comment-1276468</link><description>looking forward to less friendfeed &amp;lt;grins&amp;gt; I do think you have benefited enormously from this though as you have become the figurehead for friendfeed publicly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: friendfeed or social thing? or are lifestreams a waste of time?</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/friendfeed_or_social_thing_or_are_lifestreams_a_waste_of_time/#comment-1276469</link><description>Think I am contradicting myself in this post somewhat - I prefer the ability to message back into the orginal service, and yet I am saying that users would not have to sign up for the various services. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Does that mean friendfeed is better for mainstream users?  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I think I end up with the life stream aggregator being integrates at the OS or browser level (ie not a website) and all these services being able to be signed into using openID (which would allow the commenting.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:26:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: friendfeed or social thing? or are lifestreams a waste of time?</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/friendfeed_or_social_thing_or_are_lifestreams_a_waste_of_time/#comment-1276471</link><description>the short answer is not right now - I&amp;#039;ll give a more detailed answer in the next few posts!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:08:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rushmore Drive: An Ethnic Targeted Search Engine</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/rushmore_drive_an_ethnic_targeted_search_engine/#comment-1276474</link><description>lol - yea the video is bad - very bad marketing in practice :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: amazon redesign - where&amp;#8217;d the books go?</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/amazon_redesign_where8217d_the_books_go/#comment-1276476</link><description>hmm weird, mine does too now :) well hoorah anyhow :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: what if your IP was portable?</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/what_if_your_ip_was_portable/#comment-1276480</link><description>true - the reverse lookup would not work.. that still requires the ability to take the IP address with you which leaves us back with changing the way the internet works at its core. The only way around that would be to have some way of broadcasting your dynamic dns identity rather than your IP address.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: new blog design</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/new_blog_design/#comment-1276482</link><description>Thanks :) The previous design had 3 columns as well - but the main post area was very narrow - this layout allows me to write more without filling up the entire front page &amp;lt;grins&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: push email on an iPhone - come on gmail ;)</title><link>http://razorshine.disqus.com/push_email_on_an_iphone_come_on_gmail/#comment-1276487</link><description>You would think so - one thing I am not expecting yet is something similar to Google Apps - allowing me to use my own domain name but using gmail as the interface. I think I would move back to Yahoo if that came out - Gmail is pretty stagnant right now and Yahoo&amp;#039;s email platform looks the best featured. All that assumes the speed of the interface is quick though &amp;lt;grins&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: dancing elf - viral marketing :)</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/dancing_elf_viral_marketing/#comment-7806157</link><description>lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is gmail hiding the from address in google apps spam folder?</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/is_gmail_hiding_the_from_address_in_google_apps_spam_folder/#comment-7806168</link><description>Hmm one thing Google Reader has improved is the speed with which it grabs posts. Within a few seconds I had added that it applied only to Gmail in Google Apps and not Gmail (and changed the post title). Google Reader shows the old title and content :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-7610650</link><description>thanks :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-7610651</link><description>Have you taken a look at Cachelogic? They cache popular content for ISPs at the edge of their network to help reduce those running costs. For me this is a better place to cache content than on the edge of content delivery networks like Akamai.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Of course I have no idea how well that can scale - but its a first step towards reducing the costs of delivering content using an IP based network.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-7806175</link><description>Docsis 3 is the technology Virgin Media are using to achieve the 50Mbps speeds (scalable up to around 100Mbps).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-7806177</link><description>Sky have the ability to use their satellite connection to deliver large amounts of content - they can therefore get more from the 24mbps connection than the other providers can - of course they are stuck on the upstream. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; But you got me thinking further - Sky would also need to use the same ADSL 2+ connection for video on demand, which if HD quality, would chew through a lot of that bandwidth too. I had forgotten they can&amp;#039;t do VOD.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-7806179</link><description>thanks :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV service providers - the future</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/tv_service_providers_the_future/#comment-7806180</link><description>Have you taken a look at Cachelogic? They cache popular content for ISPs at the edge of their network to help reduce those running costs. For me this is a better place to cache content than on the edge of content delivery networks like Akamai.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Of course I have no idea how well that can scale - but its a first step towards reducing the costs of delivering content using an IP based network.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louis gray and friendfeed</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/louis_gray_and_friendfeed/#comment-7610658</link><description>I wonder whats next :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:53:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louis gray and friendfeed</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/louis_gray_and_friendfeed/#comment-7806182</link><description>I wonder whats next :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:53:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louis gray and friendfeed</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/louis_gray_and_friendfeed/#comment-7806183</link><description>looking forward to less friendfeed &amp;lt;grins&amp;gt; I do think you have benefited enormously from this though as you have become the figurehead for friendfeed publicly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: friendfeed or social thing? or are lifestreams a waste of time?</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/friendfeed_or_social_thing_or_are_lifestreams_a_waste_of_time/#comment-7806184</link><description>Think I am contradicting myself in this post somewhat - I prefer the ability to message back into the orginal service, and yet I am saying that users would not have to sign up for the various services. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Does that mean friendfeed is better for mainstream users?  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I think I end up with the life stream aggregator being integrates at the OS or browser level (ie not a website) and all these services being able to be signed into using openID (which would allow the commenting.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:26:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: friendfeed or social thing? or are lifestreams a waste of time?</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/friendfeed_or_social_thing_or_are_lifestreams_a_waste_of_time/#comment-7806186</link><description>the short answer is not right now - I&amp;#039;ll give a more detailed answer in the next few posts!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:08:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rushmore Drive: An Ethnic Targeted Search Engine</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/rushmore_drive_an_ethnic_targeted_search_engine/#comment-7610661</link><description>lol - yea the video is bad - very bad marketing in practice :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rushmore Drive: An Ethnic Targeted Search Engine</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/rushmore_drive_an_ethnic_targeted_search_engine/#comment-7806189</link><description>lol - yea the video is bad - very bad marketing in practice :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: amazon redesign - where&amp;#8217;d the books go?</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/amazon_redesign_where8217d_the_books_go/#comment-7806191</link><description>hmm weird, mine does too now :) well hoorah anyhow :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 17:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: what if your IP was portable?</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/what_if_your_ip_was_portable/#comment-7806195</link><description>true - the reverse lookup would not work.. that still requires the ability to take the IP address with you which leaves us back with changing the way the internet works at its core. The only way around that would be to have some way of broadcasting your dynamic dns identity rather than your IP address.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: new blog design</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/new_blog_design/#comment-7806197</link><description>Thanks :) The previous design had 3 columns as well - but the main post area was very narrow - this layout allows me to write more without filling up the entire front page &amp;lt;grins&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: push email on an iPhone - come on gmail ;)</title><link>http://riazkanani.disqus.com/push_email_on_an_iphone_come_on_gmail/#comment-7806199</link><description>You would think so - one thing I am not expecting yet is something similar to Google Apps - allowing me to use my own domain name but using gmail as the interface. I think I would move back to Yahoo if that came out - Gmail is pretty stagnant right now and Yahoo&amp;#039;s email platform looks the best featured. All that assumes the speed of the interface is quick though &amp;lt;grins&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Closed is a recipe for failure</title><link>http://whoisfarhan.disqus.com/closed_is_a_recipe_for_failure/#comment-16411314</link><description>I think we can be pretty sure Google and Apple are actively talking - you can't really have Google taking advantage of hidden API calls/bending app store rules without active collaboration between the two companies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schmidt's resignation does not change that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real issue is Apple's business model and it is not a new model that has just come about - this has been their model since forever - Macs are a closed environment; ipods the same. It should come as no surprise that they also want to heavily control the iphone as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is interesting is that the iphone is cannabalising ipod sales (see here: &lt;a href="http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/07/22/ipod.being.cannibalized/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/07/22/ipod.bei...&lt;/a&gt;). So Apple is doing to itself what the other mp3 players could never do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Closed is a recipe for failure</title><link>http://whoisfarhan.disqus.com/closed_is_a_recipe_for_failure/#comment-16411315</link><description>In the mobile space, the question now is whether Google, Microsoft, Palm and Nokia are able to out innovate Apple. Over time being open definitely leads to greater innovation but it is the fast followers who often succeed over the innovators. Apple is no fast follower though - they are pure innovators so I think it likely that over time Apple will either need to be more open or be happy as a small niche cool player.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the past they have preferred to be the niche cool player.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why books won&amp;#8217;t die, yet.</title><link>http://whoisfarhan.disqus.com/why_books_won8217t_die_yet/#comment-16411322</link><description>Of course it could be argued that our views are tainted by experiences growing up with books.. for comparison, will books go the way of tapes or vinyll. Tapes have effectively disappeared and you dont hear many people reminiscing over their dsiappearance like you do with vinyll. My take is that like vinyll it'll be a treasured item amongst a small niche within the next 10-15 years and that in the mainstream books will slowly disappear. Kids who enjoy books will stop having those positive experiences with physical books at a young age and will see the ebook as just the way stories etc are obtained.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riaz Kanani</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:28:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>