<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rent prius</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/36608531d7d6a4c250ab17add371fedd/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:41:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Affiliate Marketing, Get Paid for Nothing</title><link>http://jangro.disqus.com/affiliate_marketing_get_paid_for_nothing/#comment-22777285</link><description>paging Jeff Molander...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Simple Steps to Own Your Internet Market Niche, for Free</title><link>http://bettercloser.disqus.com/5_simple_steps_to_own_your_internet_market_niche_for_free/#comment-9110465</link><description>Bill - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This whole post can be translated to your other post on leadmarketwatch about being an affiliate. Discovering your niche as an affiliate is often the hardest thing for someone to do when first starting out in affiliate marketing. I blew though a ton of money before I found my niches...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:19:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Did All the Lead Generators Go?</title><link>http://leadmarketwatch.disqus.com/where_did_all_the_lead_generators_go/#comment-9111667</link><description>I have to laugh at someone putting an affiliate link to LMB here... Come on people...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can A Link Redirect Acquire PR?</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/can_a_link_redirect_acquire_pr/#comment-1792079</link><description>Welcome to a black hat method of getting anything to rank. If you were to have a bunch of one way, relevant links going to that page (which happens to have tons of keywords on it) and then redirect it, you can rank for any phrase you want. Just think all about your anchor text...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome to Black Hat (SEO)</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/welcome_to_black_hat_seo/#comment-1792094</link><description>Why do you think this is a mistake? Ultimately, it's how you implement it and utilize the traffic is where it becomes grey. Hurry up and make sure the link ranks for something in the natural rankings and make some money from it. BTW, the PR you see in the G toolbar isn't real anyway... just a reason for you to download their toolbar. At the end of the day it's all about traffic --  if you don't have it, you might as well go home.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:05:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome to Black Hat (SEO)</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/welcome_to_black_hat_seo/#comment-1792096</link><description>Vlad -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still think you are looking at it incorrectly. There is so much rubbish out there when it comes to SEO -- one of those things is black hat vs. white hat. Somewhere black hat got equated with bad/evil practices and white hat as noble do-gooders. That's crap. SEO is an art with a little bit of science to it. If it was pure science then everyone would be doing it. Do what works for you and if it mucks up, then learn from that lesson and try it again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can A Link Redirect Acquire PR?</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/can_a_link_redirect_acquire_pr/#comment-1620841</link><description>Welcome to a black hat method of getting anything to rank. If you were to have a bunch of one way, relevant links going to that page (which happens to have tons of keywords on it) and then redirect it, you can rank for any phrase you want. Just think all about your anchor text...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome to Black Hat (SEO)</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/welcome_to_black_hat_seo/#comment-1620846</link><description>Why do you think this is a mistake? Ultimately, it's how you implement it and utilize the traffic is where it becomes grey. Hurry up and make sure the link ranks for something in the natural rankings and make some money from it. BTW, the PR you see in the G toolbar isn't real anyway... just a reason for you to download their toolbar. At the end of the day it's all about traffic --  if you don't have it, you might as well go home.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:05:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome to Black Hat (SEO)</title><link>http://volodymyrzablotskyy.disqus.com/welcome_to_black_hat_seo/#comment-1620848</link><description>Vlad -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still think you are looking at it incorrectly. There is so much rubbish out there when it comes to SEO -- one of those things is black hat vs. white hat. Somewhere black hat got equated with bad/evil practices and white hat as noble do-gooders. That's crap. SEO is an art with a little bit of science to it. If it was pure science then everyone would be doing it. Do what works for you and if it mucks up, then learn from that lesson and try it again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Financial Planning for Startups (Planning Tool)</title><link>http://vinnylingham.disqus.com/financial_planning_for_startups_planning_tool/#comment-1609083</link><description>Vinny - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The link to the Excel sheet 404s...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Inks Mobile Advertising Deals in 18 Countries; Intel, Pepsi Sign-on</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/yahoo_inks_mobile_advertising_deals_in_18_countries_intel_pepsi_sign_on/#comment-9411927</link><description>I love Yahoo. They are the underdog in this search battle and who can't love 'em for that? I think they are doing lots of things right and aren't getting any love for it -- this is just one example. I think another is their support for RightMedia. That said, I'd just be really curious to see how the mobile ads work and if the major advertisors stick around. In any case, three cheers for Yahoo!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:12:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Should Yahoo Do About Social Networking And Search?</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/what_should_yahoo_do_about_social_networking_and_search/#comment-13571186</link><description>Come on yahoo... Can someone there repeat the mantra, "don't screw up, don't screw up"? Acquiring myspace and all it's spammers for $11B would be a paramount screwup.  There are so many better ways to deploy 11B than to blow it on a has-been site. Great post, as always, Scott.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wish List for Twitter</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/wish_list_for_twitter/#comment-17133990</link><description>How about a revenue model? All those suggestions are nice but twitter won't be around much longer unless they find a way to make a buck...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rent prius</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:39:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>