<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Fabio Cevasco</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/3621fca7a03d99398ff5cde130f21235/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:18:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A River of TWiT</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/a_river_of_twit/#comment-4832166</link><description>It definitely sounds interesting, although, as others pointed out, it is prone to spam and to flooding (but again, it will be called *river* for a reason, right?).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I'm not a big fan of real-time streams, mostly because I think they are difficult to follow and therefore difficult to be really useful in the long term. While a live stream of this kind would definitely be amusing to look at, it won't be as useful as, say, a combination of del.icio.us and twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A middle-tier of moderation could be a solution, but it's difficult to foresee how viable this might be: you'd need quite a lot of people checking the strem in real time, *all the time*. Maybe Twit fans can do that though, it's hard to tell at thi stage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another problem would be content duplication: you really don't want people to suggest the same damn link 5 times every time, right? &lt;br&gt;StackOverflow encountered a similar problem: when a question was posted, it literally took a couple of minutes or less for the fast person to post an answer. Meanwhile, another 5 users may have been busy writing exactly the same answer: this resulted in frequent duplication.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For some ideas on how to solve this problem, have a look at the StackOverflow blog: &lt;a href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2008/10/solving-the-fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2008/10/solving-t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyhow, hope it works out, one way or the other!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabio Cevasco</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 3: History</title><link>http://dria.disqus.com/firefox_3_history/#comment-1568176</link><description>Thanks for the recap. Personally, the AwesomeBar truly stands out from competition (namely Opera), as I pointed out myselt (&lt;a href="http://www.h3rald.com/blog/thoughts-on-firefox3-and-opera95" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.h3rald.com/blog/thoughts-on-firefox3...&lt;/a&gt;). &lt;br&gt;Overall, Firefox 3 is much, much more usable, fast and "smart" than its predecessor. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kudos to you, the Dev Team and the whole community!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabio Cevasco</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Field Guide to Firefox 3</title><link>http://dria.disqus.com/field_guide_to_firefox_3/#comment-1568263</link><description>Thanks for blogging about Firefox 3. Your posts were really very helpful for writing my latest eBook about Firefox 3:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/books/firefox3/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sitepoint.com/books/firefox3/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabio Cevasco</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:17:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TODO: design a better todo</title><link>http://polimath.disqus.com/todo_design_a_better_todo/#comment-9312785</link><description>Well, for me it's quite simple:\n\nTodoist (&lt;a href="http://todoist.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://todoist.com/&lt;/a&gt;) is the best *online* todo list and Tudumo (&lt;a href="http://www.tudumo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.tudumo.com&lt;/a&gt;) is the best *offline* one. Both free (for now, at least), both simple and both really slick and neat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabio Cevasco</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vim for the win</title><link>http://zefme.disqus.com/vim_for_the_win/#comment-15004870</link><description>I have to agree with you. I love Vim. I love its minimalism and power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Typing things like "gg=G" to indent all your code *properly* is just priceless, and it makes sense, too!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(for non Vimmers:&lt;br&gt;gg: go to the beginning of the document&lt;br&gt;=: Indent line&lt;br&gt;G: go to the end of the document)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabio Cevasco</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:18:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>