Why is it important when debating a situation to use perjorative labels? Frankly, when I see that I immediately assume about -25 intelligence points. Why would you give yourself such discredit? Are your arguments so unpowerful as to need to leverage kindergarten playground debating techniques?
CK>> The “liar” or the “leader” who didn’t take the time to investigate the situation clearly before acting? At best they share equal blame.
Are you REALLY, HONESTLY saying that our country should NOT be able to expect our President and those whom he commands to be truthful when presenting a case to our people, our congress, the world? Are you REALLY saying they need to analyze evidence that OUR PRESIDENT gives to us?
Are you REALLY saying that if someone if power IN OUR COUNTRY can dupe others in our government, that it is the fault of those that are duped, not the fault of the duper?
Are you REALLY SURE you want to set that precedent? Be careful what you wish for...