<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Nerd</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/2b36006043c7d2a8961656b04398bd0f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:37:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MySQL Taking A Bad Turn?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/mysql_taking_a_bad_turn/#comment-4350015</link><description>Bad news, PostgreSQL have the same relationship.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is the difference between the SCO-MySQL deal and the SCO-PostgreSQL/EnterpriseDB deal?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1895%2C1846635%2C00.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1846635,00...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They were both announced at the same time.  They are both doing the same thing (providing certified binaries to run on SCO).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As usual, MySQL gets bad press and PostgreSQL gets ignored.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nerd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MySQL Taking A Bad Turn?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/mysql_taking_a_bad_turn/#comment-11142110</link><description>Bad news, PostgreSQL have the same relationship.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is the difference between the SCO-MySQL deal and the SCO-PostgreSQL/EnterpriseDB deal?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1895%2C1846635%2C00.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1846635,00...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They were both announced at the same time.  They are both doing the same thing (providing certified binaries to run on SCO).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As usual, MySQL gets bad press and PostgreSQL gets ignored.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nerd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>