Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Unregistered
aliases
- Josh Chambers
- Josh Chambers
- Josh Chambers
Josh Chambers
Is this you? Claim Profile »
10 months ago
in 2008/09/10/internet-politics/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Great post! The last section was especially good. I also feel like social media has become a bit prideful across the board....
In response to a few of the other comments, in no way did I take this to be flaming "right-wing." The author clearly pointed to Obama's smear campaign, Palin just happens to be more relevant this week. Furthermore, who cares what the author's political affiliation is? That's not the point. The man had to give examples to contribute to the larger point of this article--and he said "a few examples from today" not "a few examples from the last 3 months." Seriously, that Palin photo is ridiculous (as is Obama being accused of being an Islamic Terrorist).
@Bratton: You said: "The point: surely Mashable! does not mean to insinuate that Robert P. Murphy of all people is exemplary of the kind of expert information we should champion? Surely."
You're right. I don't think that's what "Mashable!" was saying at all. I read this post to say that, regardless of your beliefs on this--or any other--issue; we the "social-media" are lazy fact checkers, and start groups/threads based on emotion and partisanship rather than factual info (no different than 'real life' I suppose). The point wasn't whether the article was correct, the point was that it's a peer reviewed article by an 'expert' and we flippantly disregard it with a quick three sentence comment--if we even read it. And, as the author mentioned, because people trust their friends first, facts can be too quickly disregarded.
@Crunkfish: You said: "until the mainstream news channels and tabloids (and politicians for that matter) are held accountable for the lies and mistruths of sensationalist journalism and the unwashed masses start questioning the spin and thinking for themselves (I can always dream!), I don’t see why an unpaid blogger writing about what amuses and excites them should be held to higher standards than the professionals."
You just proved the author's point. "Until we, the unwashed mases start questioning spin." That's what this author is suggesting we do, and he is suggesting we do it with social media. What better tool to begin with?
In response to a few of the other comments, in no way did I take this to be flaming "right-wing." The author clearly pointed to Obama's smear campaign, Palin just happens to be more relevant this week. Furthermore, who cares what the author's political affiliation is? That's not the point. The man had to give examples to contribute to the larger point of this article--and he said "a few examples from today" not "a few examples from the last 3 months." Seriously, that Palin photo is ridiculous (as is Obama being accused of being an Islamic Terrorist).
@Bratton: You said: "The point: surely Mashable! does not mean to insinuate that Robert P. Murphy of all people is exemplary of the kind of expert information we should champion? Surely."
You're right. I don't think that's what "Mashable!" was saying at all. I read this post to say that, regardless of your beliefs on this--or any other--issue; we the "social-media" are lazy fact checkers, and start groups/threads based on emotion and partisanship rather than factual info (no different than 'real life' I suppose). The point wasn't whether the article was correct, the point was that it's a peer reviewed article by an 'expert' and we flippantly disregard it with a quick three sentence comment--if we even read it. And, as the author mentioned, because people trust their friends first, facts can be too quickly disregarded.
@Crunkfish: You said: "until the mainstream news channels and tabloids (and politicians for that matter) are held accountable for the lies and mistruths of sensationalist journalism and the unwashed masses start questioning the spin and thinking for themselves (I can always dream!), I don’t see why an unpaid blogger writing about what amuses and excites them should be held to higher standards than the professionals."
You just proved the author's point. "Until we, the unwashed mases start questioning spin." That's what this author is suggesting we do, and he is suggesting we do it with social media. What better tool to begin with?
1 year ago
in 2008/06/26/greasemonkey-friendfeed/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Thanks! I'm using both Twitter and Friend Feed, and I've been looking for some ways to further integrate the two. My biggest problem with Friend Feed, is that a lot of my Twitter friends aren't on Friend Feed, so I have to track both apps separately. Any ideas?
2 replies
Stan_Schroeder
Good suggestion by CannonGod. Another thing you can try is use Twhirl or AlertThingy. You might not be very keen on using a desktop client for Twitter/FriendFeed, but believe me, these are worth it. They're both good, whichever you use is really down to personal preference.
CannonGod
Have you tried using Summize? Access the advanced search options and include in your searches the names of those on Twitter you follow. Click search, then look over on the right for a 'Subscribe to this Search' with the RSS icon next to it. Then add this into your FriendFeed stream like any other RSS feed :)
Benefits being able to post through twitter when commenting on other's twitters.
Disadvantage is speed. RSS is a bit slower than manually refreshing Twitter.
Benefits being able to post through twitter when commenting on other's twitters.
Disadvantage is speed. RSS is a bit slower than manually refreshing Twitter.
1 year ago
in Google Takes on SocialAds on Social Times
Hey Nick. You ask the question if this will reduce the attractiveness of social ads. I'm of the opinion that social ads aren't attractive in the first place. I understand they're a growing demographic; but I have yet to see them prove to be efficient ROI. How about you?
1 year ago
in 8 Stupid Things Webmasters Do To Mess Up Their Analytics on Marketing Pilgrim
Thanks very much! Solid article. I'm continually shocked at how many people forget about internal traffic.
Really good summation.
Cheers.
Really good summation.
Cheers.