<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Tony</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/29c1f5106ceda480d45e9509e59009d3/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:17:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Anyone Have a Copy of Bit-Unlocker?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/anyone_have_a_copy_of_bit_unlocker/#comment-4357819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The researchers at Princeton have instructions on how to conduct a simple experiment testing memory remanence of your own system using a simple Python script:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://citp.princeton.edu/memory/exp/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's cool, but is mostly for illustrative purposes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hyperlink Trailing Slash Debate</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_hyperlink_trailing_slash_debate/#comment-4358814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I agree leaving off the trailing slash for directory links is inefficient from a technical perspective, I disagree with your recommendation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For me the resource to conserve is attention, not TCP/IP packets. It is simpler to leave the trailing slash off all links so you don't waste a second considering whether to include a slash at the end of your link or not, depending on the resource.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also think a consistent link format is more visually appealing given a list of links. In my view, the trailing slash is superfluous information (i.e. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruft" rel="nofollow"&gt;cruft&lt;/a&gt;) for the information consumer. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Neat log analysis though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hyperlink Trailing Slash Debate</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_hyperlink_trailing_slash_debate/#comment-4358813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point, though I was refering to lists of links in plain text (like an email). Now if we could only get rid of the double slash cruft in the protocol declaration ("http://"). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sir Tim:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Looking back on 15 years or so of development of the Web is there anything you would do differently given the chance? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would have skipped on the double slash - there's no need for it. Also I would have put the domain name in the reverse order - in order of size so, for example, the BCS address would read: http:uk/org/bcs/members. This would mean the BCS could have one server for the whole site or have one specific to members and the URL wouldn't have to be different."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=ConWebDoc.3337&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where The Hell is Matt?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/where_the_hell_is_matt/#comment-4358860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. I really like media and activities that reduce perceived national and ethnic barriers. This video is about how, deep down, everyone just wants to dance. :) It's a simple message of the brotherhood of man.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's a high quality version of the video with a link to a download: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.vimeo.com/1211060&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is his website—neat story:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.wherethehellismatt.com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am, As of Today, Thoroughly Enthralled With American History</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/i_am_as_of_today_thoroughly_enthralled_with_american_history/#comment-4358932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is something I would like to study in depth as well. I started reading the Federalist Papers a couple years ago, but left off reading them. I'll have to begin again because they were very enlightening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can, however, recommend 1776 by  David McCullough. It is well regarded and made me appreciate the struggle of the revolutionary war much more. Audible has a good unabridged version read by the author.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:25:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Data Loss Database</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/data_loss_database/#comment-4360253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link. I had a custom Google News feed for data loss, but this feed appears to be more thorough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:20:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dealing With Your Friends&amp;#8217; Poor Written English</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/dealing_with_your_friends8217_poor_written_english/#comment-7366910</link><description>I once corrected my HR manager whom I considered my friend. She would always reply to any email thanking her with a one-line "your welcome" email. She sent these to everyone in the whole firm. I sent her a short, polite email pointing out that she really meant "you're welcome". I got back a blistering email saying that if I had time to critique her grammar, then she would find more work for me to do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've since resolved not to correct a friend's grammar again—at least not via email or chat. Text-based media are too lean to convey a helpful critique without coming across as insensitive. The risk of someone taking offense is always there. But maybe I would make a suggestion again face-to-face over lunch or something.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:17:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anyone Have a Copy of Bit-Unlocker?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/anyone_have_a_copy_of_bit_unlocker/#comment-11180373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The researchers at Princeton have instructions on how to conduct a simple experiment testing memory remanence of your own system using a simple Python script:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://citp.princeton.edu/memory/exp/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's cool, but is mostly for illustrative purposes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hyperlink Trailing Slash Debate</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_hyperlink_trailing_slash_debate/#comment-11189704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I agree leaving off the trailing slash for directory links is inefficient from a technical perspective, I disagree with your recommendation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For me the resource to conserve is attention, not TCP/IP packets. It is simpler to leave the trailing slash off all links so you don't waste a second considering whether to include a slash at the end of your link or not, depending on the resource.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also think a consistent link format is more visually appealing given a list of links. In my view, the trailing slash is superfluous information (i.e. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruft" rel="nofollow"&gt;cruft&lt;/a&gt;) for the information consumer. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Neat log analysis though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hyperlink Trailing Slash Debate</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/the_hyperlink_trailing_slash_debate/#comment-11189706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point, though I was refering to lists of links in plain text (like an email). Now if we could only get rid of the double slash cruft in the protocol declaration ("http://"). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sir Tim:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Looking back on 15 years or so of development of the Web is there anything you would do differently given the chance? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would have skipped on the double slash - there's no need for it. Also I would have put the domain name in the reverse order - in order of size so, for example, the BCS address would read: http:uk/org/bcs/members. This would mean the BCS could have one server for the whole site or have one specific to members and the URL wouldn't have to be different."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=ConWebDoc.3337&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where The Hell is Matt?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/where_the_hell_is_matt/#comment-11190756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. I really like media and activities that reduce perceived national and ethnic barriers. This video is about how, deep down, everyone just wants to dance. :) It's a simple message of the brotherhood of man.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's a high quality version of the video with a link to a download: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.vimeo.com/1211060&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is his website—neat story:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.wherethehellismatt.com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am, As of Today, Thoroughly Enthralled With American History</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/i_am_as_of_today_thoroughly_enthralled_with_american_history/#comment-11192046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is something I would like to study in depth as well. I started reading the Federalist Papers a couple years ago, but left off reading them. I'll have to begin again because they were very enlightening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can, however, recommend 1776 by  David McCullough. It is well regarded and made me appreciate the struggle of the revolutionary war much more. Audible has a good unabridged version read by the author.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:25:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Data Loss Database</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/data_loss_database/#comment-11211942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link. I had a custom Google News feed for data loss, but this feed appears to be more thorough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:20:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>