<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bachwards</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/295cdba06b2fabeba3f5a3d6add74135/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:32:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Clark on Polanyi (the Bad One)</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/clark_on_polanyi_the_bad_one/#comment-646541</link><description>I fear Clark glosses over why other social scientists actually enjoy the book.  Even if you disagree about the consequences of laissez-faire or Polanyi's anthropological claims, I think his point about the embeddedness of markets in society is still worth considering and is probably the main reason sociologists and others still recommend the book.  I think Clark's general aversion to institutional explanations for economic outcomes (see also his negative review of Avner Greif's book) precludes him from giving this full consideration.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Santhi Hejeebu and Deirdre McCloskey had a really interesting piece on Polanyi a few years ago in Critical Review.  I cannot find a non-gated link online, but &lt;a href="http://www.deirdremccloskey.com/pubs/drafts/blyth.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;here is a response they wrote to a critic of their original essay&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bachwards</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yup: Over Seventy Buck per Hour</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/yup_over_seventy_buck_per_hour/#comment-3998890</link><description>Would you perchance describe them as trust fund scumbags?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bachwards</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:32:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>