Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Paul Benedict
Is this you? Claim Profile »
9 months ago
in Google comes out against Proposition 8 on The Inquisitr
We hadn't noticed. The web searches have been so even-handed in the priorities of the propaganda it has steeped the issues in.
11 months ago
in War Over Words in Proposition 8 on ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected
I also thought I saw somewhere that Attorney General Brown believes that the language in Proposition 8 is not retroactive. Brown clearly has a bias in his perception of this issue. Since the California Supremes did not even hear the case, why does Brown think he has a right to alter the language in any way?
The honesty issue might be made all the muddier by remembering that Chief Justice George is using the word "marry" in a very different way than either Proposition 8 or 22 did. To Chief Justice George "marriage" is a nebulous and undefined patchwork of rights that, appearing or disappearing at the whim of government, are conferred on people "Party A" and "Party B". That's not exactly marriage-- not the way it’s meant in Prop. 8 or 22.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
The honesty issue might be made all the muddier by remembering that Chief Justice George is using the word "marry" in a very different way than either Proposition 8 or 22 did. To Chief Justice George "marriage" is a nebulous and undefined patchwork of rights that, appearing or disappearing at the whim of government, are conferred on people "Party A" and "Party B". That's not exactly marriage-- not the way it’s meant in Prop. 8 or 22.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
11 months ago
in War Over Words in Proposition 8 on ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected
I also thought I saw somewhere that Attorney General Brown believes that the language in Proposition 8 is not retroactive. Brown clearly has a bias in his perception of this issue. Since the California Supremes did not even hear the case, why does Brown think he has a right to alter the language in any way?
The honesty issue might be made all the muddier by remembering that Chief Justice George is using the word "marry" in a very different way than either Proposition 8 or 22 did. To Chief Justice George "marriage" is a nebulous and undefined patchwork of rights that, appearing or disappearing at the whim of government, are conferred on people "Party A" and "Party B". That's not exactly marriage-- not the way it’s meant in Prop. 8 or 22.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
The honesty issue might be made all the muddier by remembering that Chief Justice George is using the word "marry" in a very different way than either Proposition 8 or 22 did. To Chief Justice George "marriage" is a nebulous and undefined patchwork of rights that, appearing or disappearing at the whim of government, are conferred on people "Party A" and "Party B". That's not exactly marriage-- not the way it’s meant in Prop. 8 or 22.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
11 months ago
in War Over Words in Proposition 8 on ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected
I think you did a nice job talking about the deceptive use of words in Jerry Brown's new ballot amendment. I think it is important that Californians understand that on California's new marriage licenses there are no more "husbands" and "wives" only "Party A" and "Party B."
On my website there are a couple of articles that basically "busts" the California Supreme Court for ordering everyone to use the word "marriage" in a deceptive way. I don't know if Judge George meant to do it or not, but he sort of confesses right in his opinion.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
On my website there are a couple of articles that basically "busts" the California Supreme Court for ordering everyone to use the word "marriage" in a deceptive way. I don't know if Judge George meant to do it or not, but he sort of confesses right in his opinion.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
11 months ago
in War Over Words in Proposition 8 on ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected
I think you did a nice job talking about the deceptive use of words in Jerry Brown's new ballot amendment. I think it is important that Californians understand that on California's new marriage licenses there are no more "husbands" and "wives" only "Party A" and "Party B."
On my website there are a couple of articles that basically "busts" the California Supreme Court for ordering everyone to use the word "marriage" in a deceptive way. I don't know if Judge George meant to do it or not, but he sort of confesses right in his opinion.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
On my website there are a couple of articles that basically "busts" the California Supreme Court for ordering everyone to use the word "marriage" in a deceptive way. I don't know if Judge George meant to do it or not, but he sort of confesses right in his opinion.
<abbr>Paul Benedicts last blog post..Another Genius! on ... http://thetownscrier.blogspot.com</abbr>
