<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for fullo</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/28f4b93162bef554e624154514dd5bd6/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:37:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogger Accreditations for LeWeb Paris</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/blogger_accreditations_for_leweb_paris/#comment-3224224</link><description>the google form doesn't work :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fullo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Objects for Wordpress plugins</title><link>http://funwithwordpress.disqus.com/using_objects_for_wordpress_plugins/#comment-3024485</link><description>nice tutorial, but instead of use a php4-only object you should create a php5, or crosscompatible, object.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ie.&lt;br&gt;class myClass(){&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;    function __construct(){&lt;br&gt;        // do something&lt;br&gt;    }&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    function myClass($args){&lt;br&gt;        //php 4 compliant fake constructor&lt;br&gt;        $args = func_get_args();&lt;br&gt;        call_user_func_array(array(&amp;amp;$this, '__construct'), $args);&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;    }</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fullo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Objects for Wordpress plugins</title><link>http://funwithwordpress.disqus.com/using_objects_for_wordpress_plugins/#comment-3024487</link><description>as I know call_user_function_array can be used to call statically  an object method. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I don't know if there are some valid reasons to not use __contruct($args) { $this-&amp;gt;myClass($args) ); as you suggest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Btw, I've studied a little more and I've discovered that &lt;blockquote&gt;"To ease the transition from PHP 4, if PHP 5 cannot find a method names __construct() within your object hierarchy, it revers to the PHP 4 constructor naming scheme and searches accordingly" (from "Upgrading to PHP5" Adam&lt;br&gt;Trachtenberg (O'Reilly))&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;however, IMHO, this should not be used. Especially if you work with object that extends other object. Because it should be very easy to break your code simply changing the name of the parent class [parent::MyParent ==&amp;gt; parent::NewParentName ].</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fullo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: miniCamp: fare business in tempo di crisi</title><link>http://bolognain.disqus.com/minicamp_fare_business_in_tempo_di_crisi/#comment-11833130</link><description>Francesco Fullone&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ideato.it" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ideato.it&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Offrire servizi su web senza cambiare l'AS400, ovvero come utilizzare il vecchio gestionale per offrire servizi ai propri clienti.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fullo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:37:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>