<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jeff</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/27d637b6f491bcbee2c87f13136b675e/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:02:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twinity passes 50K beta users</title><link>http://themetaversejournal.disqus.com/twinity_passes_50k_beta_users/#comment-3303949</link><description>Twinity looks horrible, feels horrible, and is a waste of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:14:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PalmPre vs. iPhone vs. WinMo vs. Android vs. BlackBerry - Fight!</title><link>http://mobilitysite.disqus.com/palmpre_vs_iphone_vs_winmo_vs_android_vs_blackberry_fight/#comment-8557509</link><description>Zealot- in case you didn't notice, those scores were the running tallies up to that point, not the points for that round. iPhone and Palm Pre got 1 point for the round, and as stated that's based off of Gizmodo's experience with them at CES.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also the G1 does support multi-touch.  It's not integrated into the OS yet, but third party programs have demonstrated its usage.  Which brings me to my next point- how does the open source OS not win at developer community and development platform?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All in all this wasn't the best of tests- you're pitting an unseen hardware and OS in the Palm Pre against just an OS (Windows Mobile) and an entire line of hardware (Blackberry).  It would have been a better and more consistent test if you were to compare one phone from each OS like Giz did, adding a Windows Mobile phone and a Blackberry of your choice and using only those.  Of course, it could be hard to justify picking just one- maybe that's why Giz only used phones that are the only option with their respective operating systems.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Jeff Bezos (one-week Kindle review)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/dear_jeff_bezos_one_week_kindle_review/#comment-9694633</link><description>It doesn't have a teleporter either. That sucks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 18:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: College kids: Kindle blows</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/college_kids_kindle_blows/#comment-17812275</link><description>What's a Kindle?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:02:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>