<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for daddysteve</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/22d277442a4382b47e88f9c93c34d898/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:32:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Three independent congressional candidates file</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/three_independent_congressional_candidates_file/#comment-1667937</link><description>I don't think the socialists realize the victory they achieved when Vilsack was elected. Maybe they have more to cheer about than they think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:45:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: King: Marriage debate will mobilize Iowans for GOP</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/king_marriage_debate_will_mobilize_iowans_for_gop/#comment-1667961</link><description>This republican doesn't give a damn about an issue(or lack thereof) like DOMA. We are faced with real problems like credit deflation and military misadventures. How about a half TRILLION deficit added to 9 TRILLION national debt. But if we keep the gays in the closet then everything will be alright.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Culver opposes federal plan to define birth control as abortion</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/culver_opposes_federal_plan_to_define_birth_control_as_abortion/#comment-1667959</link><description>States rights? What a novel concept. I can remember a recent presidential candidate expressing these sentiments and it didn't seem to go over so well in Iowa. I guess these ideas are just naive and quaint until they affect someone directly. BTW- how long has the Iowa Independent been around because I'm from Davenpit and I've never heard of it. Of course I don't get around much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leach for VP?</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/leach_for_vp/#comment-1667949</link><description>"Rising above partisanship"? More like both parties are indistinguishable in philosophy and action.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:20:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Loebsack, Miller-Meeks on Leach&amp;#8217;s Obama endorsement</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/loebsack_miller_meeks_on_leach8217s_obama_endorsement/#comment-1667935</link><description>Maybe Leach believes blowing money we don't have "in the U.S.-infrastructure,etc." is better than blowing money we don't have "outside the U.S.-rest of empire". I can agree with this sentiment, however, Obama's recent shift in military philosophy seems to indicate there will be no meaningful reduction in worldwide troop deployment.. Since the "entitlements" are definitely not going to be reduced and you can't cut interest payments on the national debt, the only meaningful reduction is the military(and in a BIG way-ala Ron Paul). Both parties want "guns and butter" and it didn't work in the 60's and it's obvious it won't work today.  Have a nice day :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:00:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Supreme Court rules D.M. school board acted lawfully</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/supreme_court_rules_dm_school_board_acted_lawfully/#comment-1667850</link><description>This may make for a more interesting school board election than the usual "ho-hum" stuff. Voter apathy on school board elections is probably the problem and not any lack of funding, I would imagine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:08:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barr and McKinney file for President in Iowa</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/barr_and_mckinney_file_for_president_in_iowa/#comment-1667992</link><description>The republicrats aren't offering much this time around so I am seriously considering the third party vote. The "lesser of two evils" crap is getting old.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barr and McKinney file for President in Iowa</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/barr_and_mckinney_file_for_president_in_iowa/#comment-1667993</link><description>Whe y'all gonna send me my password?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: King: Marriage debate will mobilize Iowans for GOP</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/king_marriage_debate_will_mobilize_iowans_for_gop/#comment-1667966</link><description>Randall    If I'm the steve you're referring to, I think you misunderstand what I was saying. I was basically crying about fiscal irresponsibility being a greater threat than dudes kissing in public. Much greater.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:03:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legendary Texas oilman Pickens sees America&amp;#8217;s future in Iowa&amp;#8217;s wind</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/legendary_texas_oilman_pickens_sees_america8217s_future_in_iowa8217s_wind/#comment-1668023</link><description>Leverage a buy-in from congress? This idea is great and long overdue but the idea that Pickens and his billionaire buddies need what is basically a govt. subsidy is rather suspect. I see a lot of money hopping around the stock market at this time, from financials to commodities,back to financials ,etc. IMO, I see a lot of people out there desperate to find an investment for the long haul. A healthy tax break should be all the intervention congress needs to make. Any other subsidy will only serve the insiders and stifle  healthy competition.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:31:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legendary Texas oilman Pickens sees America&amp;#8217;s future in Iowa&amp;#8217;s wind</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/legendary_texas_oilman_pickens_sees_america8217s_future_in_iowa8217s_wind/#comment-1668022</link><description>Smaller private power production could result in many turbines being built locally in various states, whereas one large subsidised corp. would probably buy a bulk lot from China. (IMO once again)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:35:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nebraska&amp;#8217;s Nelson says Obama is better on agriculture</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/nebraska8217s_nelson_says_obama_is_better_on_agriculture/#comment-1668010</link><description>This guy is bragging about being in on this latest farm bill? I'm sorry Iowa farmers but the farm bill is bloated, fiscal recklessness at this point in time. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of McCain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:58:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Register to cut 26 positions by Wednesday</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/register_to_cut_26_positions_by_wednesday/#comment-1668017</link><description>My prediction is you will be hearing "deflation" more and more while you hear "inflation" less and less.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slow traffic on Iowa&amp;#8217;s Internet</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/slow_traffic_on_iowa8217s_internet/#comment-1668034</link><description>This explains a little about my DSL. That and my crappy computer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:22:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harkin: McCain is hostile to farm country</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/harkin_mccain_is_hostile_to_farm_country/#comment-1668078</link><description>I won't vote for McCain but on the farm bills he is absolutely correct. And did the govt. subsidize cars and light bulbs to make them commercially viable? What an ignorant statement. Why does big business get the majority of benefits from the bill and why is there always so much other crap in these bills that have nothing to do with farming? the only good thing about Harkin lately is that he voted against FISA. Can't say that about Grassley.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Worker walk-out at Agriprocessors further disrupts production</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/worker_walk_out_at_agriprocessors_further_disrupts_production/#comment-1712230</link><description>A Jewish labor dispute in Wherethehell, Iowa?  This must be one weirdest things I've heard lately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:30:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: King: Drill, drill, drill!</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/king_drill_drill_drill/#comment-1712392</link><description>I can agree with energy development. For King to say he's a fiscal conservative and then advocate our huge military is just ridiculous.  This country has FINANCIAL problems.  BTW- if you people out there think any media outlet is unbiased then you are naive children. This place allows comments.  If I find one of their posts factually or philosophically incorrect then I will be happy to say so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:53:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Socialists take different approach to ballot access</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/socialists_take_different_approach_to_ballot_access/#comment-1712416</link><description>Socialism?      Puuuhleez!         Read a history book.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:56:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Officials break ground for new Iowa National Guard Readiness Center</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/officials_break_ground_for_new_iowa_national_guard_readiness_center/#comment-1712430</link><description>Shouldn't they be building this in Iraq or Afghanistan?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:58:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ron Paul ad campaign targets Minneapolis, MOA</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/ron_paul_ad_campaign_targets_minneapolis_moa/#comment-1884281</link><description>Thank you Minnesota Independent for mentioning the name that neo-cons hate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not-so-big tent: Republican convention host committee pushed for cancellation of Ron Paul, Rage Against the Machine events</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/not_so_big_tent_republican_convention_host_committee_pushed_for_cancellation_of_ron_paul_rage_agains/#comment-2310788</link><description>Wow. hadn't heard about this one. I think the city and especially the Target Center were wise not to allow this. The Paulers are a motivated bunch to begin with and to steer that motivation towards something like revenge seems less than prudent. IMO</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama wins a very favorable Hollywood celebrity endorsement: Barbara Streisand</title><link>http://conservativeblog.disqus.com/obama_wins_a_very_favorable_hollywood_celebrity_endorsement_barbara_streisand/#comment-14026688</link><description>More of the same- different name. I've been around a long time and I predict a bunch of disillusioned people in the next couple of years. Especially on the democrat side. Many young voters are going to get a taste of how Washington really works.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:30:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s Hope, Change and Other Weasel Words: The Politics of Usual</title><link>http://conservativeblog.disqus.com/obama8217s_hope_change_and_other_weasel_words_the_politics_of_usual/#comment-14026562</link><description>Socialism is bad. Fascism is bad. What's the lesser of two evils here?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:06:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s Hope, Change and Other Weasel Words: The Politics of Usual</title><link>http://conservativeblog.disqus.com/obama8217s_hope_change_and_other_weasel_words_the_politics_of_usual/#comment-14026563</link><description>You youngsters are showing your age if you think either party is about anything but business as usual.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:09:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Special Interests Pour in Convention Dollars</title><link>http://conservativeblog.disqus.com/special_interests_pour_in_convention_dollars/#comment-14027223</link><description>Just another indication of how much "reform" and /or  "change" we can expect from our two party system.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlogWatch: Social Security in Peril, Candidate Avoidance &amp;#38; Other Budgetary Debacles</title><link>http://conservativeblog.disqus.com/blogwatch_social_security_in_peril_candidate_avoidance_38_other_budgetary_debacles/#comment-14027957</link><description>It should be obvious why neither party wants to mention our fiscal difficulties. It is because there are no easy answers, just painful and  politically inconvenient ones.  There is no place for truth in an election year. Just ask Ron Paul.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:00:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama tells supporters – Argue and get in their face</title><link>http://conservativeblog.disqus.com/obama_tells_supporters_argue_and_get_in_their_face/#comment-14028590</link><description>Listen to all the republicrats at each others throats. When you figure out that both sides are wrong then I look forward to seeing  you in the Ron Paul camp. Good luck with this election.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Far From Running For President, Now Ron Paul Is Just Trying To Hold Onto His House Seat</title><link>http://sayanything.disqus.com/far_from_running_for_president_now_ron_paul_is_just_trying_to_hold_onto_his_house_seat/#comment-19051338</link><description>9 Trillion national debt. A number so big it looses meaning. Let's try this. $60,000 for every &amp;quot;woking&amp;quot; American. How long do you have to work to pay that much in taxes? I'll never do it and neither will my wife. So one of you &amp;quot;politically sophisticated&amp;quot; individuals out there owes $120,000 on top of the $60,000 you already owe. You geniuses run right out and vote for the republicrat of your choice and then get to work earning that taxable income.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daddysteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>