<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Richard</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/21f0dc666e6f66f01b31c2719e5c1244/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:49:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Harvard Crimson :: Opinion :: What Do Critics of Israel Have to Fear?</title><link>http://thecrimson.disqus.com/thread_82617/#comment-691875</link><description>May I suggest a strategy? Listen to Ron Paul talk about Israel. Not a word passes that man's lips that is not deliberate and exhaustively analyzed. He is impossible to rattle.  He is unfailingly polite and civil. Many neocons and  Zionists try  to pin the anti-Semite label on Ron Paul but it never sticks.  Call most Americans an anti-Semite and we grovel and whimper. Ron Paul does not, which is why some find him so infuriating.  &lt;br&gt;When trying to persuade people,  admit that the US spends huge amounts of money and risks huge numbers of American lives protecting Europe, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and others too numerous to mention. Admit that the Jews are quite right to demand their fair slice of that political pie. Point out that you are willing to sacrifice American money and American lives to protect the USA, but not foreign countries, including those that comprise your own racial homeland.  Our goal is to shrink the foreign welfare pie to zero so that we as Americans do not need to fight over it.  My racial ancestry is English and German.  Britain and Germany can fend for themselves. So can Israel. These countries do not need, and have no right to demand,  American lives or American dollars. &lt;br&gt;Watch Ron Paul on YouTube!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Adviser: McCain Camp &amp;#8216;Smoking Crack&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/former_adviser_mccain_camp_8216smoking_crack8217/#comment-3395348</link><description>You can only steal a close election. Not that Repubs won't try.&lt;br&gt;My question: lets say the (hacked) totals from a single polling place come to a negative number for Obama. Say negative 10,000 votes for Obama in polling place X.  Let's say Obama receives 1,000,000 votes from the rest of the polling places in that state. Does he suddenly have 990,000 votes because of the negative ten thousand from the one location? Or is the negative number ignored?  In 2004 in Ohio, I recall that there were negative totals from some locations and I'm not sure how the negative numbers were handled. There will have to be a court ruling on this someday. Otherwise, one polling location could reverse any election.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:49:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>