<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Sekenre</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/211920d414ee984c3bda22bbebbf66c1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:38:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Factor Attraction</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/the_factor_attraction/#comment-2753638</link><description>You've explained one of the major selling points of Factor for me.  I like to learn a language by reading code that others have written. In a language with a lot of syntax, named variables, really long functions etc, it's really hard to figure out what was originally meant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By encouraging this factorisation, Factor is making it easier for me to understand what the original programmer *meant* when they wrote it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sekenre</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>