<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for anon</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/210a1a644b40defbbef0dc178eb7e54f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:37:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Douthat-Carter Continuum</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/the_douthat_carter_continuum/#comment-708876</link><description>If I might borrow from the legal world, this continuum question tries to solve through tort what is really a question of contract.  In other words, while there are obvious conceptual similarities and differences between the various forms of sexual expression listed here, there's no simple answer to the effect that, e.g., "porn is OK" or "porn is not OK" when in a relationship.  In some relationships it's fine; in others, it isn't; it just depends on what the parties have agreed to among themselves.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me like this argument is assuming some kind of Rule In The Sky about what's Right vs Wrong in a relationship, which seems silly.  There's no god out there, remember?  You have to figure it out as you go, which means in this case that the answer here is always going to be relationship-specific.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:37:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>