<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Calvin</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/1fe2208d54af9ce3d73949de1b8b9640/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:08:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How To Increase Productivity in 10 Minutes</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/how_to_increase_productivity_in_10_minutes/#comment-1882180</link><description>The webapp is called "Todoist", no 'L' in there. I prefer SlimTimer+Backpack myself, these days. Although the offline combination of TreeLine and Task Coach is getting promising again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:03:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Upgrade AOL</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/how_to_upgrade_aol/#comment-1882212</link><description>I can't say it looks all that interesting, but I &lt;a href="http://ironfroggy-code.blogspot.com/2007/05/igoogle-versus-netvibes-versus-yahoo.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;don't put much weight into these custom start pages&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Introduce Blogging Projects</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/how_to_introduce_blogging_projects/#comment-1882991</link><description>I fear I'm having more trouble with my 30-second pitch than I should. Figuring out how to say what my business even is shouldn't be this difficult. Or does everyone have such trouble?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:20:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Start A Web Business</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/how_to_start_a_web_business/#comment-1883004</link><description>Great advice there, and I loved the video at the end. I just need to get off my butt and do this thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:10:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Only Thing You Need To Learn</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/the_only_thing_you_need_to_learn_31/#comment-1483393</link><description>I am so ashamed. With so much to read, watch, and listen to, once I read the first line "Learn to be patient." I felt it summarized the article nicely enough, and didn't read another word.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great article!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:25:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wacky idea for python coroutines</title><link>http://tplus1.disqus.com/wacky_idea_for_python_coroutines_34/#comment-720394</link><description>I've thought about this but came to the conclusion that this begs a distinction between error handling and error repair and repair we can simply handle with proper callbacks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:32:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which code layout do you like more?</title><link>http://tplus1.disqus.com/which_code_layout_do_you_like_more/#comment-11194913</link><description>I can use both, depending on the context. The difference is in the intent. Is the call to g() essential to executing f() or is it coincidentally needed for both conditions?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:47:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RockStarProgrammer - Ruby's HTTP Client Sucks</title><link>http://rsp.disqus.com/rockstarprogrammer_rubys_http_client_sucks/#comment-2723912</link><description>The builtin http client should provide some default user agent (python's does!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RockStarProgrammer - Stack Overflow is a Time Machine</title><link>http://rsp.disqus.com/rockstarprogrammer_stack_overflow_is_a_time_machine/#comment-4665834</link><description>The array question got on the reddit programming front page, hence the high views.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:41:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don't Forget The Downtime</title><link>http://metajack.disqus.com/dont_forget_the_downtime/#comment-4568333</link><description>I know what the code-from-home dad thing is like. Do it myself. I'm actually starting to see the peak of my productivity from this model, and I'm looking for office space to move into nearby. I'll get more done away from the house and actually focus on the wife and kid when I'm home, with work out of mind.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/05/19/joe-lieberman-youtube/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_04452/#comment-6003809</link><description>Do they say terrible things? Yes.&lt;br&gt;Do they say it in a forum with more freedom than the world they seek to create? Yes.&lt;br&gt;Do we ourselves have less freedom of public expression, resulting in our "war" against them? Yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does this mean they should be silenced? Abso-fucking-lutely not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Freedom of speech is absolute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we can't beat them without silencing their message, we obviously aren't being convincing enough to those they are converting. Fight them with our own free speech and expression.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:21:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Distributed Transactions on App Engine</title><link>http://notdot-blog.disqus.com/distributed_transactions_on_app_engine/#comment-20618675</link><description>Why wouldn't you leave them around? They are the record that this transfer between accounts happened. It makes sense to keep that history.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Distributed Transactions on App Engine</title><link>http://notdot-blog.disqus.com/distributed_transactions_on_app_engine/#comment-20618704</link><description>I'm just saying for the context it was presented in, leaving them makes sense. Still, you can use the exact same process as a multi-step "mark for deletion" and then periodically delete all sets who are marked.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>