<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Barbara Esbin</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/1e3a00dbd85fdf2bab9a8eeb8c435c4c/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:22:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Former FCC Chairman: Comcast Action Legality &amp;#8220;Murky&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/former_fcc_chairman_comcast_action_legality_8220murky8221/#comment-1803996</link><description>I agree wholeheartedly with what Cord has written about the need to maintain the rule of law and cub the FCC's propensity to expand its regulatory reach beyond its statutory boundaries.   I have written about this and other issues in my recent piece, "The Law is Whatever the Nobles Do:  Undue Process at the FCC."  Although I wrote the piece prior to release of the Comcast P2P Order, having now reviewed the Order, I stand by my analysis.  There are myriad legal and procedural problems with the FCC's action, and they will likely doom its chances on appeal. For the complete analysis, please see:  &lt;a href="http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/2008/pop15.12undueprocess.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/2008/pop15....&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barbara Esbin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:22:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>