DISQUS

Sin,
Thanks for the chuckle.

*************
Syntax said:
I too have friends in Iraq. One came home a few months back and gave plenty of examples of how the media is lying to the American people about the conditions of the war in Iraq.
*************

When is that darn liberal Main Stream Media going to stop protecting Bush and his foreign policy?!! Isn’t it enough we have to listen to all the one-sided debates where not one person has a single dissenting opinion? Now they’re lying for him.

Wait. I have an idea. Why don’t they start inventing stories and make fake photographs to hurt Bush’s leadership in the WoT. Or, how about they could publish details about secret government programs to try to capture terrorists thereby undermining Bush’s efforts to protect the American people. Or, how about hindering the gathering of intelligence from POWs by claiming they torture the poor, innocent, helpless terrorists in “concentration camps” (important to use that phrase because it carries and implication of the nazis in WW2).

Man that would be great. There’s just too much love for the President from the MSM today.


*************
His family greatly appreciates being called “Nazi Appeasers” by Rummy because they do question the direction and purpose of the war. There’s four (4) more Democrat votes from former Republicans!
*************

Ahh. Yet another forced conversion to liberalism. I, too, know that from day-one my beliefs and principles have hinged upon the words of politicians.

I SWEAR if even one Republican EVER calls me anything remotely bad - THAT'S IT - I'm completely forsaking God, my faith, morals, sanctity of life, patriotism, decency, intellect, my constitutional rights, and the children and future of America, so I can turn to the dark side and become a liberal...FOREVER! No, really. I mean it...kinda.


------------
WARNING: Before I get messages from liberals with high GMD levels welcoming me to the club, all my comments above are sarcastic.

Thanks, Sin, I just love liberal comments like that. Y'all really crack me up. Keep ‘em coming.

Since CAIR doesn't like the term "Islamofascist", then how about:

Is-lame-o
Islamo-murderers
Islamo-terror-tubbies : Though this smacks a little of liberalism. (making evil into something soft and cuddly)
Islamo-anti-everything
Islamo-genocidal-fanatic-psycho-nazis
Islamo-saurs : A global event (terrorism) will cause them to become extinct.
Islamo-sexual : They get sexual gratification from murdering people. Really. Just watch them after an attack, every terrorist lights up a Camel. (The cigarette, not the animal)

Some answers to her t-shirt:

* Yeah, that'll really change everything, just like that forced-fast of yours really turned the world upside down. Hey, I think you've gained weight.

* Eww, so you're going to eat and talk at the same time?

* I will not be listening.


Here's the meaning of her name in Saskatchewan Aborigine.

Sin-dy : woman ugly as sin
She-Han : female version of Han Solo (though you have to imagine he's aged a bit...ok, sorry...A LOT, and got hit in the face with an Imperial blaster)

...ORRRRR...

She looks like the poster-child for Islamic Lesbian Rights.

Actually Howard Dean is my favorite democrat. He is proof positive what can happen to the human brain if the disease of liberalism is allowed to go unchecked and untreated. Of course, this particular case indicates a highly accelerated rate of GMD (gray matter decay), but should still serve as a warning to other liberals.

Liberals pay attention: This could happen to you. Locate a conservative doctor in your area and get a regular check-up and brain scan. Every liberal should monitor their annual rate of brain tissue loss carefully. You'd rather be safe than sorry, right.

Here are some symptoms to watch for, and famous actual cases, that might indicate a dangerous level of GMD:

1) Borderline Alzheimer's symptoms: forgetting which country you live in (any liberal), forgetting how you're supposed to vote (John Kerry), forgetting the meaning of words and asking people to define them for you (Bill Clinton).

2) Uncontrollable desire to scream at the top of your lungs in rants to garnish applause from people that don’t have any idea what you’re talking about. But since you all suffer from the same disease, what the heck. (Howard Dean)

3) Hallucinations and delusions that tend to skew your sense of reality: “Hey, Al Gore won that election!”, “These terrorists are nothing more than freedom fighters”, and especially be concerned if you hear yourself saying, “I think the U.S. government was really behind the attacks on 9/11”.

4) Excessive confusion and inability to cogitate clearly and logically. For example, believing yourself to be a proponent of free speech while threatening lawsuits and legal action against someone about to publish a TV movie that you don’t like. (Everyone knows who this is.)


Please, if you’re NOT going to be conservative, be concerned. Schedule a check-up today.

chairya,

In looking at the length of my response to your wild statements, I’ll shorten it a bit and just hit the highlights.

*********
CHAIRYA:
Sorry-Where is USA defending herself?
Against Iraq ? There is evidence that Iraq had nothing to do with 9 11.Why is USA in a country which is not theirs acting like police when it is not their country ?
*********

The U.S. defends itself from all enemies who attack it. Today is September 11, five years after radical Islamic terrorists committed a gross act of mass murder killing 2,996 people. As I’ve stated earlier, we wage war against terrorists to stop future attacks from killing our people. This is called pre-emptive or pro-active defense. We don’t wait until our people are dead to defend them.

If you have proof that Saddam Hussein’s regime was not involved in supporting terrorism, as you claim, you should come forward with it immediately. The news agencies in our country would run the story non-stop for weeks, and you would be famous. Hussein’s trial is coming to a close, so the information probably wouldn’t help him, but give it up so that we can all know.

Contrary to your claims, Hussein openly offered monetary awards to the families of a person who committed homicide bombings upon American targets, essentially funding terrorism. (I think it was a value of $25,000 US for each act.)

Hussein made statements praising the 9/11 attack and called the attackers “good muslims”.

Hussein mass murdered his own people who openly spoke out against him and terror attacks against other nations. (Plenty of photo evidence for this one.) This is a form of terrorism that still is practiced today elsewhere.

Hussein’s Iraq was one of the most powerful nations in the Mid-East. As long as he continued to aid terrorists, the threat to America would remain high.

There’s other evidence, but I want to respond to your other statements and this post is going to be long.


*********
Does christianity have a fine history .Did Jesus not tell you to turn the other cheek and love the enemy?
*********

Notice that you want to compare the HISTORY of Christianity with the PRESENT of Islam. That’s called comparing apples to oranges, a phrase that indicates it’s an invalid comparison.

But if you want to look at the words of Jesus, I can think of no greater topic.

Like yourself, many people attempt to quote Jesus’ words to attack Christianity or try to accuse America of being the evil force in the war on terrorism without actually having read the Bible.

If you will read the Bible, you will see that God makes different statements to individuals than He does to nations and governments. This is because a government has different goals and responsibilities from those of an individual. For example, a nation is responsible to God for protecting the people whom it governs. An individual may serve in this capacity, but first has the responsibility of protecting and providing for their own family.

Jesus taught love, peace and brotherhood in Him. He did not teach that a people or nation should standby idly and allow their men, women and children to be exterminated. Forgiveness is not a government/military policy, it is a way in which a Christian should live their lives. Again, the responsibilities of a nation and an individual are different. For example, a nation/government has the right to impose the death penalty to protect its citizens from murderers, individuals do not.

Contrary to Jesus and the Bible, the teachings of Mohammed or Allah (whatever) show that muslims should kill kafir (infidels, non-muslims) wherever they find them. Read the Quran and see my quoted passages above. The point to Islam is to seek out disbelievers and murder them if they don’t capitulate or “submit” and either become muslim or a slave to muslims.

Now, not all muslims completely follow what the Quran teaches. If they did, I wouldn’t have a muslim friend, who happens to be from Lebanon, because the Quran says that a muslim is not to befriend unbelievers. So those who do not espouse a belief in killing unbelievers, are not the problem. Muslims, like the terrorist groups, who follow precisely what the Quran teaches are the problem.


*********
It was in the news that soldiers sexually abused and hooded Muslims.Why ? Why did they do this? Are you saying this was not in the news now ?
*********

First of all, not all news agencies are dedicated to the truth. We’ve recently seen that some news media personnel, like reporters for Reuters (hey that rhymes), actually fabricate stories and embellish the facts for the purposes of spreading propaganda. So try to confirm facts from multiple, unrelated sources before you believe what you hear, see or read.

Secondly, our judicial system carries the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. When someone is accused of committing a crime, our officials investigate it and bring the evidence and the accused to justice. Until they are proven guilty, however, they are innocent. We don’t hold to the doctrine of imprisoning a person simply because someone doesn’t like them, such as those with an anti-American agenda.

There have been cases where soldiers have been falsely accused, and ones where they have been found guilty. Either way, it’s been the American military/judicial system that’s seen justice done. Something I’m very proud of. We’re fighting for our survival but still holding to the integrity that makes our nation great.

Would terrorists do the same? No. Terrorists abuse American and other POWs as a course of their normal mode of operation. Our POWs do not get the protection that the captive terrorists do.


*********
Are these soldiers not christian ? What are they ?
*********

An unusual statement, because the answer to your question is…in your question. What are these soldiers? Well, they’re…soldiers. The U.S. armed forces are comprised of people from practically every faith and religion (including muslims), and even those who don’t have a religion at all. Being Christian is not a prerequisite to serving in our military.


*********
CHAIRYA:
IT TAKES TWO TO BE WRONG,NOT JUST ONE.
*********

Wow, this one is way out there. It takes two to be wrong? So when one person states the truth and another one denies it, they have to both be wrong? No, it only takes one person to be wrong.

But this is not about being right or wrong. It’s about stopping people who are bent on genocide, which just happens to be right. If the terrorists would stop attacking, capturing/executing, and bombing innocent civilians, they wouldn’t be under fire. It’s just that simple.


------------
Wow, this was a long post, but you made some pretty wild statements, so.

I've heard people blindly advocate that we are fighting terrorism in the Mid East to protect our precious resource of oil. How sad that they can only see the loss of oil as the motivation.

No. The millions of Americans like Frank Reisman are the precious resource we are fighting to protect. They are irreplaceable.

God bless the victimized families of the 9/11 attack and of terrorist attacks being perpetrated worldwide.

Anne, Anne, Anne,

Emotions aren’t proof of your claims. Your feelings are beside the point.

*******************
“However,you first say that you are not against Islam,then you talk as if all Islam is bad.”
*******************
I think you’ve misunderstood my comments. Let me restate them as clear as I can.

I am not against any particular muslim, I AM against any religion or belief system that espouses the killing of those who refuse to believe in it, as I’ve shown is stated in the Quran. Subsequently I am also against anyone who carries out such atrocities.

My evaluation of Islam is based upon what is written within its teachings. That does not necessarily trickle down to every muslim.

Each person is responsible for their own actions. If a person chooses to be muslim, I have no problem with that. If they choose to kill those who don’t believe as they do, I do have a problem with that.


*******************
All faiths are not perfect.What about the torture and abuse of Islam men in the prison camps?Is this not wrong?
*******************

First, I don’t know to what you’re referring. If you’re referring to the Gitmo POW facility, then you’re making unsubstantiated claims. There has never been proof of torture at Gitmo to my knowledge. Maybe you don’t know what torture is. Follow this link if you want to see what torture was like under the rule of Saddam Hussein.

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/092559.php

Second, even if there were torture going on there, what religion are you saying is responsible for it? It’s a government/military facility.


*******************
I do not agre with evil in faiths,but let us look at the beauty of those who are true in their faiths and look at individuals,not just at the evil.
*******************
No. Let us look at all sides of the matter, and let us look at the teachings of the religion itself and weigh the evidence. If Islam teaches peace it should be clear in the Quran. If it teaches violence it should also be clear. I’ve already given references where it does espouse violence against non-muslims.

There are peaceful muslims, no doubt. There are also violent muslims. But to be a peaceful muslim you have to deny the passages of the Quran that I have cited previously.

*******************
I am grateful steve and olaf were returned.
*******************

I am also glad that two of my fellow countrymen, innocent individuals, were spared the deaths that so many others have received from these violent murderers.


*******************
we need to join hands in all faiths and talk,not fight.
*******************

A lovely sentiment. I’m sure then you’ll join us in demanding that the muslim terrorists stop attacking innocent civilians and put an end to the hostilities. Stop the homicide bombings, car bombings, capturing and then executing innocent people, and the list goes on. The premise is simple: Stop attacking us, and we won’t have to defend ourselves.

-------------------------
You’ve given no proof of your claims that Islam is peaceful. You’ve stated several times that your beliefs are based on your feelings. Any clear-minded person knows that feelings do not hold truth, they are emotional reactions.

Therefore, I don’t think there’s any point to trying to provide you with logical information. You’re working off of emotions.

I sincerely hope that you will actually look at, read and study the things I’ve given you. Try to keep and open mind, open eyes, and an open heart (for the victims, not the murderers). I believe you should have the freedom to choose to be Taoist, but under Islamic law you would not. If you’re going to debate with others you should have something more to back up your statements than your emotions.

God bless.

Anne,

You should actually read and study what Islam teaches before you espouse it is peaceful.

**************************
"I do not agree with terrorism,or killings of innocents,but let us concentrate on the main point."
**************************

THE MAIN POINT? THAT IS THE MAIN POINT!

THE MAIN POINT IS that the Islamic terrorists are killing innocent people. These two men were released only because they claimed to convert to Islam.

If you think that killing innocent people is a secondary issue, then there's one obvious problem with your philosophy.



**************************
"i know Islam is a valid and peaceful faith and as important as OUR faiths."
**************************


You know that Islam is a peaceful belief? How? What evidence do you have of that? Where is the peaceful nature of Islam displayed? You say you know it's peaceful, yet you give

no indication as to why. Just because someone says they're peaceful doesn't mean they are.

The fact is that Islam is not peaceful. The word Islam mean "submission". Their faith is built on forcing others to submit to their god and religion or become a slave.


Here are direct quotes from the Quran, the basis of muslim faith.

* Wherever there are people who refuse to convert to Islam, muslims are called on to fight them and kill them.

2:191 And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the

Sacred Mosque, unless they fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith.


* The ultimate goal of Islam is to destroy all other religions by any means until the whole world is Islamic. The only way for a person to not be killed is to become a muslim.

(The Quran does not respect the right of a person to believe what they choose.)

2:193 And fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah, but if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the

oppressors.

3:85 And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers.


* Muslims should fight non-muslims and should harden their hearts against them.

9:123 O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness; and know that Allah is with those who fight.


* Non-muslims are viewed as the lowest form of life.

8:55 Lo! the worst of beasts in Allah's sight are the ungrateful who will not believe.


* When fighting non-muslims, a muslim is required to fight to the death by Allah or else he will send them to hell.

8:15 O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them.

8:16 Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless manoeuvring for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be

hell, a hapless journey's end.



I've already given you a list of innocent people muslim terror groups have killed. That's not what I call peaceful.

Is the news filled with homicide bombing attacks by Taoist, Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, or Shinto terrorists? This is something unique to Islam.

I think I've proven my point.


The fact is, if you're truly a Taoist and not only one by name, then you don't believe in the existence of evil (or good for that matter) as Taoism makes no provision for it. You

see everything as two sides of the same universe. Therefore, you are blind as to what is going on here and cannot see the truth of their hatred.



**************************
"These men were not killed,and I do not believe they would have been killed."
**************************

Then you're ignoring all factual evidence to the contrary in favor of what you want to feel. You're blinding yourself to the truth so that you can justify your beliefs and

feelings.



**************************
"Show fear to these terrorists,hit back,argue,and they have won.
They have already won,and you do not see it yet."
**************************

You speak of fear, because that's all you understand. Your pacifist attitude grants license to these murderers of innocent people. You claim to be against such murder, yet you

deny justice for such acts. The only people that these murderers have WON against are those who, like you, espouse that the best action is not to defend yourself against them,

which is to submit.

The United States was built on freedom: freedom of speech, assembly, AND RELIGION. In our country we highly regard our right to choose what we believe. The United States was

attacked and thousands of people killed. We defend ourselves from future attacks so that our people and children may be safe. The only way the terrorists can win is for those

who would fight to defend our freedom to lay down and surrender in fear, which is what you propose. Thankfully the brave men and women of our country will not allow fear to

override their faith.

What would you do if and when they came to your door? Would you submit and become a lackey and accomplice to the murdering yourself? Would you refuse to give up your right to

choose what you believe and be killed? Since you don't believe in defending yourself, that's not an option for you. Fortunately for you because the U.S. and several of their allies are fighting these murderers, you'll probably never have to face them. Though I doubt you will be grateful for such actions.


The only thing required for evil to win is for good men to do nothing.

Anne,

I don't know if you're technically an American citizen, but if you are...

Thank God we didn't have people like you calling the shots in WW2, or we would all be saluting the swastika right now.

Thank God we don't have people like you calling the shots today, or we would all have sores on our foreheads from bowing to Mecca every day at gunpoint.

Your comments show one of two possibilities: (1) Either you know absolutely nothing of the Islam faith, or (2) you are a muslim attempting to deceive your enemy in accordance with the doctrine of taqiyya, which allows you to say or do anything to further Islamic influence.

**********
ANNE STATED: "They would not have killed them,i knew deep down they would not kill them."
**********

HAVE YOU COMPLETELY LOST ALL SANITY!

One does not even have to understand the intricacies of the Islamic faith, tradition, or law to understand the slaughter of innocent people in the name of Allah. They've killed hundreds of INNOCENT people already. Put down the Kool-Aid, and switch on the news or read it online once in a while.

Here's a list of some of the known innocent people that have been killed, contrary to your feelings deep down: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#At...

But wait, there are muslims who do not agree with the violent interpretation of jihad. Fine. What are they doing to stop the violence in the name of their god?

Are they speaking out against these terrorist groups (Hamas, Hezbullah, et. al.)?
Are they helping to provide intelligence, anti-propaganda campaigns, or even support for Islamic proponents of peace?

No, and why? Because if they did they would be killed for it by the Islamofascists. I've talked to muslims who don't agree with the terrorist groups, but they're not going to do or say anything against them. If you're not against them, then you're for them.

My problem is not with any particular muslim, it's with Islam and those whose belief lies in a literal interpretation of the Quran and hadith. Such beliefs require the killing of anyone who refuses to surrender the right to believe what they choose. Under Islam you have three choices: become muslim, become a slave to muslims, or die.

The Biblical Christian says, "I will die for what I believe".
The Quranic Muslim says, "YOU will die for what I believe".

I found your site about six months ago. It's now one of my daily visited sites. Please don't change anything.

I love the commentary and video posts. I know it must take a great deal of your time, but I it helps me to keep up-to-date on the real issues. We certainly can't trust the MSM.

It was sad to see "Expose the Left" get assimilated. It was my major forum for attacking liberal insanity...which helped my demeanor in everyday life. But life goes on, and I will learn to cope.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: This war on terror has multiple fronts, and one of them is against some of our own people right here in our own land. This attack was proof of it.

The pus-filled boils who committed this crime knew he was a soldier, and attacked him because of it. How does this differ from the enemy? Attacking our own soldiers, in a time of war no less, is seditious at the very least. That is taking for granted that the perpetrators are even American citizens or even in the country legally.

I hope these men are caught and charged with sedition and punished to the full extent of the law. However, if liberals have their way, I'm sure that these men will escape prosecution, be hailed as great patriots and lauded for their actions.

Pathetic!