Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Andy
Is this you? Claim Profile »
1 month ago
in Personal Heresy: What OS You Use Is No Longer Critical - louisgray.com on louisgray.com
Only one person has mentioned the word "games". Desktop Macs are non-existent in the gaming world - sure the fanboys will respond with "oh no they are growing" - but its bullshit. PC's will always rule the gaming world for hardcore performance and amazing graphical rendering - that is until:
1. Mac's stop being so ridiculously overpriced for hardware. Example - http://store.apple.com/us/product/MA940G/B - $200 for this. What a joke. In fact do a search - you can easily pick it up for under $90.
2. Macs are great - I have one - but seriously, the monoply over hardware is their undoing. Business will never fully embrace macs because apple have such a huge stranglehold over customisation - if I want to customise and add more features, RAID structures and the like - I have to pay huge costs or simply turn to PC. Duh.
So why bring this up in a OS host? Well evidently, as gaming grows - so do reliance on Windows OS. There will always be a market for MS because of gaming - and the lack of support for other OS systems. Virtualisation is great - i am 100% in agreeance for this and I believe this will be more important than any browser.
The more fking browsers that enter the online world - the worse off we all are. Developers have to spend more and more and more time on compatibility issues and front end JS. It's becoming crazy the amount of testing thats required each time a new browser arrives or upgrades.
I love macs, but their fascist tendencies over their infrastructure is so ridiculous in this day and age its painful. Sure, the argument about "this is why they have no viruses" - but equally - most hackers hit windows because they a) have some hate of MS or b) because they are simply the most popular computer OS. As Macs grow, they will face this inevitable problem.
1. Mac's stop being so ridiculously overpriced for hardware. Example - http://store.apple.com/us/product/MA940G/B - $200 for this. What a joke. In fact do a search - you can easily pick it up for under $90.
2. Macs are great - I have one - but seriously, the monoply over hardware is their undoing. Business will never fully embrace macs because apple have such a huge stranglehold over customisation - if I want to customise and add more features, RAID structures and the like - I have to pay huge costs or simply turn to PC. Duh.
So why bring this up in a OS host? Well evidently, as gaming grows - so do reliance on Windows OS. There will always be a market for MS because of gaming - and the lack of support for other OS systems. Virtualisation is great - i am 100% in agreeance for this and I believe this will be more important than any browser.
The more fking browsers that enter the online world - the worse off we all are. Developers have to spend more and more and more time on compatibility issues and front end JS. It's becoming crazy the amount of testing thats required each time a new browser arrives or upgrades.
I love macs, but their fascist tendencies over their infrastructure is so ridiculous in this day and age its painful. Sure, the argument about "this is why they have no viruses" - but equally - most hackers hit windows because they a) have some hate of MS or b) because they are simply the most popular computer OS. As Macs grow, they will face this inevitable problem.
12 months ago
in Still cranking away... on iPhone-dev blog
haha A-Team
yeah thats exactly what im doing u clueless fkwit
im just sick and tired of all the "we are working so hard". 99% of ppl here just want an unlock. so release it ?
problem for iphone-dev team is that someone else will release something before them and all your "im want to have male sex train with the iphone dev team" will be for nothin before all the media exposure goes to someone else.
make sense you brainless morons ?
so go fk yourself morons.
yeah thats exactly what im doing u clueless fkwit
im just sick and tired of all the "we are working so hard". 99% of ppl here just want an unlock. so release it ?
problem for iphone-dev team is that someone else will release something before them and all your "im want to have male sex train with the iphone dev team" will be for nothin before all the media exposure goes to someone else.
make sense you brainless morons ?
so go fk yourself morons.
- 0 points
- Jump to »
shawnT
you're the moron for thinking they owe you anything,they could stop developing and it might take someone else a couple weeks to come up with something. shut the fuck up and understand that they're doing their best. unappreciative bitch,If you can easily go download it from another site,then go do it bitch. whine to them.
davemccr
You know what would be really awesome, if somehow that Dev Team tracked IP's and MAC addresses, and made it so anyone who trash talked them or were asses, wouldn't be able to use the new version. Then they could take their time, sip a beer or bevy of their choice, bask in the glory of their success and laugh at all the whiners that couldn't be patient and wouldn't be able to use their software.... now that, that would be nice. :)
12 months ago
in Still cranking away... on iPhone-dev blog
Sweet - at least then we would have a tool
and you would use it
lol
and you would use it
lol
2 replies
pedromendes27
Ei does gys, don't heve to do it....!!! if don't understand...pece of chtt....!!!
if you are so stressed do it yourself.... i love to se it...!!!!! just wait, this gys are doing is job very well.... end they have is live to live to....!!!! it's not your case....!!!!
Great job Dev Team....
if you are so stressed do it yourself.... i love to se it...!!!!! just wait, this gys are doing is job very well.... end they have is live to live to....!!!! it's not your case....!!!!
Great job Dev Team....
BTP
I'm sorry andy, but no matter how many times you shove your iPhone up your ass, it wont unlock
12 months ago
in Still cranking away... on iPhone-dev blog
God I hope someone releases this tool before you do.
It's just painfull with all the "peace and love not war" shit
You've had months to run through beta after beta - at the very least you could release an unlock to keep all the haterz happy (aka me)
If your still fking around after today .... I hope someone else releases something.
peace out
It's just painfull with all the "peace and love not war" shit
You've had months to run through beta after beta - at the very least you could release an unlock to keep all the haterz happy (aka me)
If your still fking around after today .... I hope someone else releases something.
peace out
2 replies
A-Team
I'm sure Andy is one of those among a growing number of people who are operating a "business" that sells the free tool(s) to unlock the iphone - then claim they are selling service.
Perhaps his customers are inundating him with calls like, "HEY, you said you would have an unlock/jailbreak method for the new firmware for your customers. WHERE IS IT!?"
Now Andy is sweating balls and without clean undies to change into he's trying to displace everything back to you guys. Of course he wants someone to release, he doesn't care who does it first or if it's as good as it can be. He's just worried about his 'service' selling business.
---
I'm a patient person and I think it's in the best interest of everyone for the team to not worry about those impatient few who cry out to let everyone know their displeasure. The patient people and your true followers won't question you for showing video of an app and not releasing it the same second.
Brush off the haters and do what you have to do to protect yourselves and your work from people who would try to make wrongly profit from it. Keep up the good work and keep fighting the good fight!
Perhaps his customers are inundating him with calls like, "HEY, you said you would have an unlock/jailbreak method for the new firmware for your customers. WHERE IS IT!?"
Now Andy is sweating balls and without clean undies to change into he's trying to displace everything back to you guys. Of course he wants someone to release, he doesn't care who does it first or if it's as good as it can be. He's just worried about his 'service' selling business.
---
I'm a patient person and I think it's in the best interest of everyone for the team to not worry about those impatient few who cry out to let everyone know their displeasure. The patient people and your true followers won't question you for showing video of an app and not releasing it the same second.
Brush off the haters and do what you have to do to protect yourselves and your work from people who would try to make wrongly profit from it. Keep up the good work and keep fighting the good fight!
BTP
Hey andy, go fuck George in the ass. Both of you can kindly fuck off and go eaet your own shit.
12 months ago
in Still cranking away... on iPhone-dev blog
Fk the video
Just release the hack or someone else will. Enough with the "video crap"
No one cares about videos, they just want the tool. It's been +3 days already and still you havent released anything.
Bring on yiPhone - at least George has a count down.
show all 4 replies
Just release the hack or someone else will. Enough with the "video crap"
No one cares about videos, they just want the tool. It's been +3 days already and still you havent released anything.
Bring on yiPhone - at least George has a count down.
- 0 points
- Jump to »
pspirate555
YES we want a new video please
James
We all waited about 4 months for the 1.1.2 BL 4.6 unlock. Shut up, go to work, earn some money, spend some money, get laid and then come back (I guarantee it will be released by then :))
James.
James.
1 year ago
in Prove Erick at TechCrunch Wrong on The Inquisitr
Whose has copyright over comments ?
“the contemporary intent of copyright is to promote the creation of new works by giving authors control of and profit from them.”
The creation of an artistic work brings about the rights which are inherit to copyright law. Any artistic work (refer to the statutory definition) includes written works. Comments are written and therefore those rights are passed to the author. There is no agreement - explicit or implied - which allows you to gain exclusive ownership over comments because their is no relationship which provides you automatic ownership by mere occasion.
I think its more an issue of the anonymity on the internet and the fact that the only identifiable and tracable piece of evidence which can confer copyright ownership in a dispute is binary code and IP addresses.
“the contemporary intent of copyright is to promote the creation of new works by giving authors control of and profit from them.”
The creation of an artistic work brings about the rights which are inherit to copyright law. Any artistic work (refer to the statutory definition) includes written works. Comments are written and therefore those rights are passed to the author. There is no agreement - explicit or implied - which allows you to gain exclusive ownership over comments because their is no relationship which provides you automatic ownership by mere occasion.
I think its more an issue of the anonymity on the internet and the fact that the only identifiable and tracable piece of evidence which can confer copyright ownership in a dispute is binary code and IP addresses.
1 year ago
in New Seesmic Player Launches, iPhone Version Will Be Killer on Social Times
Whose has copyright over comments ?
"the contemporary intent of copyright is to promote the creation of new works by giving authors control of and profit from them."
The creation of an artistic work brings about the rights which are inherit to copyright law. Any artistic work (refer to the statutory definition) includes written works. Comments are written and therefore those rights are passed to the author. There is no agreement - explicit or implied - which allows you to gain exclusive ownership over comments because their is no relationship which provides you automatic ownership by mere occasion.
I think its more an issue of the anonymity on the internet and the fact that the only identifiable and tracable piece of evidence which can confer copyright ownership in a dispute is binary code and IP addresses.
"the contemporary intent of copyright is to promote the creation of new works by giving authors control of and profit from them."
The creation of an artistic work brings about the rights which are inherit to copyright law. Any artistic work (refer to the statutory definition) includes written works. Comments are written and therefore those rights are passed to the author. There is no agreement - explicit or implied - which allows you to gain exclusive ownership over comments because their is no relationship which provides you automatic ownership by mere occasion.
I think its more an issue of the anonymity on the internet and the fact that the only identifiable and tracable piece of evidence which can confer copyright ownership in a dispute is binary code and IP addresses.
1 year ago
in 2007/09/01/i-invented-facebook/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Let's be honest. I don't even live in America (Australia) and I developed a book called the "faces of many books" way back in 1995, when I was 15. I basically got out a scrap book and cut pictures of faces out of magazines and pasted them into this book and then let my whole family comment about these people.
It is obvious that I am the inventor of facebook and im happy not to take any court action, but I do want to be named the founder of facebook since I worked hard and I should be called the founder.
Andy
P.S - Im not sure what fkwit Aaron Greenspan thinks he is but a "founder" is typically associated to a company. You become a 'founder' when you actually found the company associated with the idea. Refer to Wikipedia for clarification 'An entrepreneur (a loanword from french introduced and first defined by the Irish economist Richard Cantillon) is a person who undertakes and operates a new enterprise or venture and assumes some accountability for the inherent risks.' - how the fk is Aaron Greenspan the founder ? Someone please enlighten me.
It is obvious that I am the inventor of facebook and im happy not to take any court action, but I do want to be named the founder of facebook since I worked hard and I should be called the founder.
Andy
P.S - Im not sure what fkwit Aaron Greenspan thinks he is but a "founder" is typically associated to a company. You become a 'founder' when you actually found the company associated with the idea. Refer to Wikipedia for clarification 'An entrepreneur (a loanword from french introduced and first defined by the Irish economist Richard Cantillon) is a person who undertakes and operates a new enterprise or venture and assumes some accountability for the inherent risks.' - how the fk is Aaron Greenspan the founder ? Someone please enlighten me.