<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for drvictordavishj</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/154e7970410a3b4d5375a46adb4eca50/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:25:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Euphemism Watch</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/euphemism_watch/#comment-1788557</link><description>Sons of Batman seems more apt.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drvictordavishj</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Batman&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Dark Knight&amp;#8217; Reflects Cheney Policy</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/batman8217s_8216dark_knight8217_reflects_cheney_policy/#comment-1790778</link><description>I agree with you but I would argue that the film is not necessarily all that pro-Batman. After all, Alfred</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drvictordavishj</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:32:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Batman&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Dark Knight&amp;#8217; Reflects Cheney Policy</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/batman8217s_8216dark_knight8217_reflects_cheney_policy/#comment-1790772</link><description>One thing you're overlooking, oogiedoogie, is that the film strongly implies that the Joker is a reaction to Batman. That Batman's flamboyant, melodramatic symbolism creates an equally flmaboyant, evil one. We most definitely do not "need such heros" if they just wind up creating more problems than they solve.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And make no mistake, oogiedoogie, Batman doesn't win at the end of this movie. It's at best a draw.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drvictordavishj</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>