http://disqus.com/people/14fb3e15d286620e740ce71f093b2c5e/enSat, 20 Jun 2009 19:58:03 -0000http://avc.disqus.com/causewired_quote_of_the_day_22/#comment-2966351For $518 i hope they're getting at least 518 copiesanonThu, 09 Oct 2008 14:10:59 -0000http://fakesteve.disqus.com/jaron_lanier_takes_on_the_freetards/#comment-56425Yeah. But you are forgetting something. He has dreads.anonWed, 02 Jan 2008 23:58:19 -0000http://steroidreport.disqus.com/infinite_number_of_undetectable_designer_steroids_with_combinatorial_chemistry/#comment-1899792google on "designer steroid detection" and follow the first link:<br><a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1402217" rel="nofollow">http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender....</a><br><br>Their method extracts anything that binds specifically to androgen receptors and then applies conventional GC/MS analysis. Any peak that does not match known endogenous compounds (e.g. testosterone) is, by definition, a non-natural androgen-receptor-binding compound. You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there! Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound. But it should detect "designer" steroids of all kinds, both known and unknown, as well as SARMS. No?anonThu, 28 Aug 2008 15:30:11 -0000http://projectyouthanize.disqus.com/thursday8217s_late_night_laugh/#comment-11518257Took him long enough.anonSat, 20 Jun 2009 19:58:03 -0000