http://disqus.com/people/14ec4359c308b218ea29793c6a109d67/enTue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/mixxmaker_facebook_meets_the_mix_tape_79/#comment-91900Oh, Fuzz is excellent as well! Good on them for recreating the whole mixtape phenomenon so well.Jeremy LimTue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0000http://allfacebook.disqus.com/is_scrabulous_going_bye_bye/#comment-1639104"I think Hasbro is faced with two bad choices - shutting Scrabulous down, or buying it. Both are likely to have negative impacts on their bottom line - they would have been much better off had Scrabulous never existed."<br><br>I disagree on this point. An acquisition would not necessarily result in a hit to their bottom line - at least not in the long term. Scrabulous would definitely be a valuable asset. <br><br>From the response shown even here in this post, it's no secret it's popular. Hasbro could feed branding and propoganda to 569,206 users every single day (provided Scabulous' users use it everyday). These are hardcore loyal fans of the game. Why throw that away?<br><br>Money can always be moved around. They can justify a buyout as a marketing expense.Jeremy LimSat, 12 Jan 2008 00:56:36 -0000