<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Scott J</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/139d80248f5dfd34413595a93e3e472c/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:11:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Where is the Republican Leadership?  Stalled Suicide Prevention Bill Irks Iowa Democratic Veterans</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/where_is_the_republican_leadership_stalled_suicide_prevention_bill_irks_iowa_democratic_veterans/#comment-1662461</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Coburn is wrong&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;i&gt;Coburn called the bill insulting to veterans and warned that its mandatory mental-health screening could harm their future job options.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bill doesn't call for mandatory screening of veterans, it mandates that screening be available to them.&amp;nbsp; Veterans aren't required to undergo screening for continued health care or any other reason.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Coburn's real fear is the "possibility" that veterans might be turned down for a firearm purchase in the future.&amp;nbsp; Evidently, he considers the 2nd Amendment more important than the safety of the veterans and their community.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, &lt;a href="http://icasualties.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;icasualties.org&lt;/a&gt; reports 122 self-inflicted deaths for Iraq vets, as of 8/31/07.&amp;nbsp; What exactly does Coburn think he's protecting?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott J</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:53:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Agriprocessors Imports Homeless Workers and Postville Pays a Price</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/agriprocessors_imports_homeless_workers_and_postville_pays_a_price/#comment-1664928</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Hmm?&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;i&gt;She chose to leave that location without informing those responsible for housing, and she went to a different house without authorization.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;"...without authorization"?&amp;nbsp; Are you kidding me?&amp;nbsp; "Guests" need authorization to leave your "guest-houses"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;"... flooding in the area"?&amp;nbsp; Really?&amp;nbsp; What flooding?&amp;nbsp; And where did the other residents of your "guest-house" go, since there were electrical and boiler issues?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott J</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:11:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>