<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Sandra77</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/136d57788d9d94d8971f29545a6b6ac2/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:57:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://siditty.blogspot.com/2009/06/interesting-article-on-dealing-with-ir.html</title><link>http://siditty.disqus.com/httpsidittyblogspotcom200906interesting_article_on_dealing_with_irhtml/#comment-20970196</link><description>Ari, I think you&amp;#39;ll hear white men mentioned most because they are the single largest group of non-black men here in the US.  And yes, people sometimes do forget that there are other groups of non-black men in the US other than white men.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Re Europe, yes it&amp;#39;s true that the attitude to IR&amp;#39;s can differ county to country.  But generally speaking, due to the fact that the history of most Euro countries is different from the US, you won&amp;#39;t find the same cultural embargo on IR&amp;#39;s.  You&amp;#39;ll also obviously find much greater variety of black cultures among black Europeans.  Some of those black cultures insist on intra-marriage only, whereas other cultures do not care.  And interestingly enough, in most Euro countries other than the U.K. (if you consider the U.K. part of Europe), you&amp;#39;ll find more black women/white men couples than the other way around. You&amp;#39;ll also see more black women/non-black men couples generally.  At least that&amp;#39;s been the case in my observations during my travels.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandra77</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:34:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://siditty.blogspot.com/2009/06/transformers-ii-ministrel-show-in.html</title><link>http://siditty.disqus.com/httpsidittyblogspotcom200906transformers_ii_ministrel_show_inhtml/#comment-20969736</link><description>Amanda, you truly are simple.  Do you think anyone takes you seriously?  Your techniques are childish.  You need to become more sophisticated and subtle in your attempts at faux racism.  Right now you&amp;#39;re just funny - in a &amp;quot;bad joke&amp;quot; kind of way.  My cat could do a better job of race-baiting than you do.  And you call yourself a human!  But keep at it - you might improve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandra77</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s &amp;quot;Baby Mama&amp;quot;</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/obama8217s_quotbaby_mamaquot/#comment-1970633</link><description>d, it's apologists like you that make it so hard for me to vote Republican.  I cannot trust you or them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandra77</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Gore To Endorse Obama Tonight</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/al_gore_to_endorse_obama_tonight/#comment-1971444</link><description>Can someone explain to me why Gore's endorsement is so important?  I don't get it.  It seems like a day late and a dollar short to me.  Was he waiting to try to protect his "friendship" with the Clintons?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandra77</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Expresses &amp;#8216;Deep Disappointment&amp;#8217; in McCain&amp;#8217;s Silence on Wife Attacks</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/obama_expresses_8216deep_disappointment8217_in_mccain8217s_silence_on_wife_attacks/#comment-1971753</link><description>Cameron, if the attacks on Michelle Obama are "just politics", then why isn't Cindy McCain being attacked for her past behavior?  Your position that "it's just politics, get used to it" is, in this case, a refuge for scoundrels.  If one is fair game, then so is the other.  So why the free pass for Cindy McCain?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandra77</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Group Of White Folks On Fox Define Michelle As &amp;quot;Angry Black Woman?&amp;quot;</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/group_of_white_folks_on_fox_define_michelle_as_quotangry_black_womanquot/#comment-1971672</link><description>Anonymous who doesn't have the courage to use a name:  at least get your facts straight - Michelle said Barack Obama was her "babies' daddy".  You can't even get that straight. F'ing laughable republican.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sandra77</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>