<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Mark Hinkle</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/11a9055ccc66d081ad8dfa4e28e668de/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:56:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Business models for open source it management companies</title><link>http://mberkay.disqus.com/business_models_for_open_source_it_management_companies_40/#comment-411332</link><description>Berkay, while you are certainly entitled to your opinion. Last time I checked HypericHQ, Zenoss, and OpenNMS all our GPL software that adhere to the open source definition. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's take the companies out of the equation. I think all three products have merit and they all three have users who use them for a variety of reasons. Corporate sponsorship diluting the "purity" of an open source is just FUD. The code is there and obtainable from third parties like &lt;a href="http://SF.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;SF.net&lt;/a&gt; if the users don't like the direction of the project they can fork it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also I think you should delve a little deeper into this great distributed IP ownership hypothesis for some projects looking at the commits for development beyond the core teams and they are pretty limited. Read some copyright's for ALL three projects and you will see copyright notices from privately and publicly held companies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think what might be interesting is to look at the forum activity  and source code repositories and see what's really going in these projects. Just because companies charge for a relatively small amount of additional code  and  a high level of service doesn't necessarily mean that the open source offering isn't a very robust solution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:01:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business models for open source it management companies</title><link>http://mberkay.disqus.com/business_models_for_open_source_it_management_companies_40/#comment-411426</link><description>Berkay, I think I misinterpreted this sentence :&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Despite being compared to Hyperic and Zenoss, OpenNMS is different product. IMHO, it is the only true open source “network monitoring” product available. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After carefully rereading I see you are advocating the use case for OpenNMS as network monitoring. I guess I have a heightened sensitivity when I see the mixture of company business models and opne source software. I would contend that Zenoss Core offers a very capable network management and monitoring capability as well. Thanks for the clarification.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: February Triangle Social Media Club:  Social Media and Enterprise 2.0</title><link>http://ignitesocialmedia.disqus.com/february_triangle_social_media_club_social_media_and_enterprise_20/#comment-5541215</link><description>I plan to attend sorry for the late notice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social network death spiral: How Metcalfe&amp;#8217;s Law can work against you</title><link>http://futuristicplay2.disqus.com/social_network_death_spiral_how_metcalfe8217s_law_can_work_against_you/#comment-1843786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting that in the early days in the life of social network there seems to be a huge land grab. Many rely on flashy graphics and a couple of A-List blogger mentions and any guys with an social application can see short term success. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, as with any product you got to provide value for them to stay. This basic concept seems to be missed by so many new social networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect for the social networking start-up the key is to gain users while Metcalf's driving the bus and close the funding before Eflactem drives it over the cliff. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Your Blog Design Work For You</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/make_your_blog_design_work_for_you/#comment-8518937</link><description>Chris, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think your blog is one of the best designed blogs I have seen. I like the small header and you keep your most relevant content above the fold. I like the separate page for the blogroll as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice use of the WP Premium.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;Mark</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 18:26:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Example of a Great PR Pitch</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/example_of_a_great_pr_pitch/#comment-8519153</link><description>I think the pitch is good but I think sending the press release is too forward. I can see @Seth's point the pitch was uninvited but to Tom's credit it seems relevant to your blog (I get scores of irrelevant pitches each month and I hate it). When I pitch bloggers I always start with a request for their permission and should they accept my overtures ask for their preferences and only pitch those folks who are writing about my topic after they "opt-in". I always comment on their blog before I send them email (and not just minutes before) and try to insert myself only after I understand their point of view and have become part of their community.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Process of  Producing Web Traffic that Gets Results, Think Like Someone Else</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/the_process_of_producing_web_traffic_that_gets_results_think_like_someone_else/#comment-9428975</link><description>Pam, Susan, and Martin, thanks for all the kind feedback.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 22:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Process of  Producing Web Traffic that Gets Results, Think Like Someone Else</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/the_process_of_producing_web_traffic_that_gets_results_think_like_someone_else/#comment-9428982</link><description>@PS3 let's take my example. My company makes a product that is open source and runs on Linux. I do a search via Google for "Linux submit news" and open+source+submit+news and start seeing what sites come up. I found &lt;a href="http://Linux.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Linux.com&lt;/a&gt; has a Submit a Story link. I submit new original news and content there. I see your site is about gaming so I did a search for "ps3 submit news" they have a share news link for their community members. I am sure the same gos for knitting, Nascar, or fishing try it with your topic and actually spend some time figuring out which portals are appropriate for you. Even participating there and having a link in your community profile can be a helpful way to build links providing you are adding value in their community.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mark R. HInkle's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/05/31/technology-links-for-5-31-08/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Technology Links for 5-31-08&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Hinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:56:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>