http://disqus.com/people/10b254a3e68a1a7bde701f24e52cbf8c/enWed, 25 Mar 2009 00:40:31 -0000http://inquisitr.disqus.com/mashable_poised_to_overtake_techcrunch_as_leading_20_blog_by_traffic/#comment-7462418Probably has a lot to do with Arrington taking a month off then coming back and not keeping 'good' posts coming. I've noticed that they seem to be posting less articles - especially on weekends.chriswTue, 24 Mar 2009 02:40:00 -0000http://technationau.disqus.com/prangzcom_another_traffic_app_doomed_to_fail_36/#comment-7486837Our hard-earned tax dollars at work - keeping public data from the public.chriswWed, 25 Mar 2009 00:40:31 -0000http://tlf.disqus.com/the_danger_of_8220the_danger_of_free8221/#comment-1453191I agree that the concept of free web services is dangerous. As a web developer, I have invested years and lots of my own money developing an online content publishing platform aimed at the masses. I intend to charge customers an annual fee to use it. The idea of giving it away for free has been considered but I decided that charging for it was a better option. One company that springs to mind is <a href="http://SmugMug.com" rel="nofollow">SmugMug.com</a> - these guys have established a very successful business in a market dominated by a free service - <a href="http://flickr.com" rel="nofollow">flickr.com</a> . Many people would think that an online photo sharing site where you have to pay is a stupid idea - but <a href="http://SmugMug.com" rel="nofollow">SmugMug.com</a> has over 450,000 users - and none of them are using the service for free. Go figure!chriswSun, 20 Jan 2008 03:23:25 -0000http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_funniest_thing_at_the_crunchies/#comment-9699266What? There's no Santa Claus? Crap!chriswSat, 19 Jan 2008 20:42:55 -0000