DISQUS

DISQUS Hello!  The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.

Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.

Nick Carr's picture

Unregistered

Feeds

aliases

  • Nick Carr
  • Nick
  • Nick Carr

Nick Carr

1 year ago

in It’s a good thing you can’t burn blogs on Mathew's comments
I agree with the first two paragraphs of Cynthia's comment. The third feels like a cop-out.

I'm also wondering whether fuckingaroundwithtextallday.com is still available, because it would be a great name for a blog.

Nick
1 reply
mathewi's picture
mathewi Of course you feel that the third paragraph is a cop-out, Nick -- that's the one where she disagrees with you :-)

And I think you and I should set up a new-media content aggregator social-networking Digg-style site at fuckingaroundwithtextallday.com, and then later we can flip it to Google for a couple of billion.

1 year ago

in Nick comes to the defence of TimesSelect on Mathew's comments
A pay wall for the Post or the Times or any other paper simply blocks people out who then go elsewhere

This is, simply, an overstatement. You assume that all the news and comments that newspapers publish are fungible. That may, sadly, be the world the web will ultimately create, but it is not the world we have today.

What the research shows is that readers often value a particular newspaper, so if they can't get the stories online they will be more likely to purchase the print edition (or vice versa).

I find it odd that you, a newspaper writer, are so quick to assume that your own work is a fungible commodity. Perhaps you should give yourself - and your colleagues - more credit.

Nick

1 year ago

in Microsoft is Dead on Zoli's Blog
Technorati's hyperactive bugginess used to annoy me, but I've kind of grown fond of it.

2 years ago

in Scoble’s Achilles heel is video on Mathew's comments
You're getting very retro, Mathew. You're also right, even if I have trouble picturing Scoble as Achilles.

3 years ago

in Web 2.0 — powered by numbskulls on Mathew's comments
To put that in context, by the way, #26 is "the proliferation of AJAX pop-up boxes" and #28 is "Canada." Nick

3 years ago

in Web 2.0 — powered by numbskulls on Mathew's comments
Mathew, when it comes to my writing, you are one of the most creative inferers (inferrers?) that I've come across. I think it's called "reading with your imagination." Anyway, I don't remember saying, or implying, that numbskulls were "Web 2.0’s biggest problem." Just to be sure, though, I went and checked my list of "The 100 Biggest Problems with Web 2.0" (I keep it under my pillow), and I found that, actually, "numbskulls" comes in at #27. Nick

3 years ago

in Nick Carr is a smart guy - but he’s wrong on Mathew's comments
I don’t know Nick, but whenever I come across stuff like that I picture a guy sitting in a wing chair in some university library somewhere, muttering to himself about how he can’t concentrate on Aristotle’s Poetics (in the original Greek, of course) because those damn kids won’t turn down their boogie-woogie music.

Nope, you don't know Nick, but I'm happy to have inspired your imagination. And now that I've roused myself from my library wingchair, emptied my pipe and staightened my bow tie, let me qualify the elitist qualifications you've so generously bestowed on me. I was an editor at HBR, not the editor, and I have written but one slender volume, though, as Johnny Thunders might have said, it was a motherfucker.

3 years ago

in Nicholas Carr says Web 2.0 “amoral” on Scobleizer
I'm not saying that Robert Scoble or Brian Bailey (or anyone else) lacks "moral sensibility." I'm saying the web lacks moral sensibility, and we can't assume that it will make the world a better place.
Returning? Login