<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Ed</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/0dd0139820c28cbd30f2201fd6881d72/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:54:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Guido Fawkes, the full story</title><link>http://pickledpolitics.disqus.com/guido_fawkes_the_full_story/#comment-22326648</link><description>Someone really oughta start up a pledge on &lt;a href="http://Pledgebank.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pledgebank.com&lt;/a&gt; where we can all chip in to a "fighting fund", just in case anyone is prepared to take on Mr Staines at his own game. Anyone sought proper legal advice yet, from a real libel lawyer?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How the FOI (Amendment) Bill slipped through</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/how_the_foi_amendment_bill_slipped_through/#comment-1928264</link><description>This is sheer idiocy and poor journalism. For anyone to claim the bill was sneaked through at the "very end of a busy parliamentary day" is pathetic - it was a Friday afternoon... it can't get any quieter in Parliament.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then you have Norman Baker complaining. All he needed to do was shout "Object" and the Bill would have been denied a second reading without debate and would go to the back of the queue again. Surely one MP, good and true, could have been there to do the honours?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I don't think this will go anywhere. Now that some noise has been generated, there will be the necessary opposition at report stage to kill the bill.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:10:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>