<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Farhan Lalji</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/0bc185898bf0461eb9f200c24490fcb1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:43:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: One Way Open Is Not Enough</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/one_way_open_is_not_enough/#comment-627</link><description>It's what people do with the data that will be interesting.  So now that the feeds are out let's see the widget's that take this one step further - i.e. integrate with blogs, push to mobile etc.  My guess is that F'book has dipped it's toe in and will open up other elements once this trial goes smoothly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Am I the only one who's concerned with the fact that people can see my friends posted items and all my friends status updates simply by knowing me?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The FPhone</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_fphone/#comment-1106</link><description>Sounds like the ideal.  Its a connection device, not just a voice device.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, someone's just unlocked the IPhone:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070824/ap_on_hi_te/iphone_unlocked" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070824/ap_on_hi_te...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tough Times Ahead For The Web?</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/tough_times_ahead_for_the_web/#comment-2839</link><description>I think there are two economic challenges here.  A macro challenge with the whole global economy - the iffy mortgages and the sale of debt all over the place and the presidential election are the inputs here.  The second is a micro challenge within technology, which is more of a correction rather then a downturn.  It happens in every industry, cycles, supply and demand balance out and the world is put right.   The good will rise to the top of the economic cup, the bad will sink and we'll all just get on with things.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Win a ticket to idesign 08 - Paul Walsh, the Irish Opportunist</title><link>http://paulfwalsh.disqus.com/win_a_ticket_to_idesign_08_paul_walsh_the_irish_opportunist/#comment-4992705</link><description>Design and the south bank two of my favourite things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Farhan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:53:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Indie labels to sell music on MySpace</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/indie_labels_to_sell_music_on_myspace/#comment-4455293</link><description>But are the two audiences the same?  I.e. are the people looking for the long tail of music the same people who are using myspace?  My guess is no.  Will be interesting to see how it pans out though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:53:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HMV is one of the most shorted stocks in history</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/hmv_is_one_of_the_most_shorted_stocks_in_history/#comment-4455307</link><description>Think the brains behind HMV wish they had taken Permira off now?  It's a shame, they have one of the strongest brands if only they had moved online sooner and stronger.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free ad-supported music coming closer to reality</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/free_ad_supported_music_coming_closer_to_reality/#comment-4455996</link><description>Hope you're right about the free model we see, but instinct tells me to believe it when I see it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, thought the FT had instituted a 30 articles for free model, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/01/business/media/01cnd-ft.html?ref=business" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/01/business/medi...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:31:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Authenticity, respect and the changing nature of business</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/authenticity_respect_and_the_changing_nature_of_business/#comment-4456002</link><description>New 2x2 matrix of authenticity and value, people who meet both will be the real winners.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:15:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter has 1+ million total users</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/twitter_has_1_million_total_users/#comment-4456115</link><description>Nic, what would you consider a reasonable valuation/investment in Twitter at these numbers?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:28:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are serial entrepreneurs any better than first time entrepreneurs?</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/are_serial_entrepreneurs_any_better_than_first_time_entrepreneurs/#comment-4456150</link><description>What about entrepreneurs who failed the first time around?  Aren't these more likely to have learned some lessons and might be due for a winner?  All things being equal of course, if it's a bad idea and a bad leader does it matter?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:10:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are serial entrepreneurs any better than first time entrepreneurs?</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/are_serial_entrepreneurs_any_better_than_first_time_entrepreneurs/#comment-4456151</link><description>sorry, missed a vital part in my comment, what about the quality of the plan/idea with the entrepreneurs who failed the first time.  You can't control for that in a study, can you?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:13:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free is the only business model for online news</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/free_is_the_only_business_model_for_online_news/#comment-4456279</link><description>Interesting, wondering if the increase in traffic and ad income would offset the income from the subscribers (no matter how minimal the number of subscribers is).  Would be interesting to see the wsj subs numbers and compare.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:12:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Reasons why Twitter is for you and FriendFeed is not</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/10_reasons_why_twitter_is_for_you_and_friendfeed_is_not/#comment-9712359</link><description>Think a lot of it is the simplicity of twitter.  It's just easy to set up and add users and follow people.  Friendfeed might not be that much more work, but it looks like it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:30:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to basics</title><link>http://hkanji.disqus.com/back_to_basics_38/#comment-16592604</link><description>Nice.  Welcome back to the world of blogging, looking forward to going through your posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You might want to use disqus or the like for commenting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: European entrepreneurship and exits</title><link>http://hkanji.disqus.com/european_entrepreneurship_and_exits/#comment-16592612</link><description>So why does the US out perform EU on $600M-$1B exits?  Is it because the US VC industry is better at spotting these really big but not huge opportunities?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:43:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UK&amp;#39;s Kangaroo VOD Service Killed By Regulators; An Opportunity For Hulu?</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/uk39s_kangaroo_vod_service_killed_by_regulators_an_opportunity_for_hulu/#comment-18837292</link><description>Funny that&amp;#39;s not what the FT says: &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f2662a9a-f21f-11dd-9678-0000779fd2ac.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f2662a9a-f21f-11dd-96...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:45:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UK&amp;#39;s Kangaroo VOD Service Killed By Regulators; An Opportunity For Hulu?</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/uk39s_kangaroo_vod_service_killed_by_regulators_an_opportunity_for_hulu/#comment-18837298</link><description>Wow.  Unbelievably stupid move by the Competition commission if you ask me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:07:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>