<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Ian</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/0a6a782bc68eeb9abb1fe1fb320e7d9a/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:27:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Обзор Типичных Конфигураций Для Nginx</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/34n_n12nn_3412n_3nnn_1_n_nginx/#comment-2460372</link><description>Thanks for the resource. How do you have nginx reverse-proxy to http and https for apache? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks really interesting, can't wait to try it out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:00:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Обзор Типичных Конфигураций Для Nginx</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/34n_n12nn_3412n_3nnn_1_n_nginx/#comment-2460375</link><description>I just thought of something...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If nginx is running the ssl and reverse proxying to apache, does the _Apache_ have to be running ssl...or is the connection between nginx and apache encrypted. Just thought of that after reading some info on Pound and seeing how it acts as an SSL wrapper.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Job, New Country, New Life!</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/new_job_new_country_new_life/#comment-2460506</link><description>Welcome to Toronto! I'm here too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:35:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nginx With PHP As FastCGI Howto</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/nginx_with_php_as_fastcgi_howto/#comment-2460459</link><description>Is there a nginx mailing list or forum? I feel bad always asking you these questions before I try and switch our site from lighttpd to nginx.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But on that note...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nginx site mentions "quick log rotation" but I can't seem to find anything on it. I pipe apache and lighttpd logs through cronolog right now. Can nginx do that and if so, what would the syntax be?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:38:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Обзор Типичных Конфигураций Для Nginx</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/34n_n12nn_3412n_3nnn_1_n_nginx/#comment-2460377</link><description>Made a partial jump last night...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fired up nginx running an ssl connection and reverse proxying it to Apache.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All seemed to work okay. Fired up Squirrelmail and was able to read messages just fine. I did notice a problem when I tried to send message.  After I hit "send" in Squirrelmail, the page wouldn't refresh to the message list, but stayed in the message edit page. The message DID get sent (I checked) but Squirrel wouldn't leave the compose message page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I checked the error logs for nginx and saw this message:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SSL_do_handshake() failed (SSL: error:14094412:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 aler&lt;br&gt;t bad certificate) while reading client request line, client: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, server: &lt;a href="http://www.myserver.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.myserver.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's the server config:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;server {&lt;br&gt;listen       443;&lt;br&gt;root /usr/local/apache/htdocs;&lt;br&gt;server_name  &lt;a href="http://www.myserver.com;" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.myserver.com;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;ssl                  on;&lt;br&gt;ssl_certificate      /usr/local/apache/conf/server.pem;&lt;br&gt;ssl_certificate_key  /usr/local/apache/conf/server.key;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ssl_session_timeout  5m;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;location / {&lt;br&gt;            root   shtml;&lt;br&gt;            index  index.shtml index.html;&lt;br&gt;location / {&lt;br&gt;            proxy_pass         &lt;a href="http://127.0.0.1:8080/;" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://127.0.0.1:8080/;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_redirect     off;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_set_header   Host             $host;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_set_header   X-Real-IP        $remote_addr;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_set_header   X-Forwarded-For  $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;            client_max_body_size       10m;&lt;br&gt;            client_body_buffer_size    128k;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_connect_timeout      90;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_send_timeout         90;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_read_timeout         90;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_buffer_size          4k;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_buffers              4 32k;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_busy_buffers_size    64k;&lt;br&gt;            proxy_temp_file_write_size 64k;&lt;br&gt;        }</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:14:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Обзор Типичных Конфигураций Для Nginx</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/34n_n12nn_3412n_3nnn_1_n_nginx/#comment-2460379</link><description>Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Обзор Типичных Конфигураций Для Nginx</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/34n_n12nn_3412n_3nnn_1_n_nginx/#comment-2460380</link><description>2scoundrel: I might have a bit of an "aha" moment here...fired up firefox's live headers and rec'd this after hitting the "send":&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Location: &lt;a href="http://www.myserver.com:8080/webmail/src/right_main.php?mailbox=INBOX&amp;amp;sort=0&amp;amp;startMessage=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.myserver.com:8080/webmail/src/right_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, it looks like the Apache backend is misbehaving and not trying to redirect to&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"https://www.myserver.com/webmail..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've seen several pages on how to configure Apache as a reverse proxy, but can't seem to find much on how it should be configured to be the backend.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:36:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Nginx As Reverse-Proxy Server On High-Loaded Sites</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/using_nginx_as_reverse_proxy_server_on_high_loaded_sites/#comment-2460410</link><description>A quick config question...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm reverse proxying to an Apache server...when I run a script that takes a lil' while to produce some input (e.g. an Amazon product fetching script) nginx will sometimes not present the output, even though the Apache script is still churning away in the background. What timeout setting do I need to adjust in this situation?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/04/04/flixster-funding/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_3616/#comment-5999754</link><description>I still shake my head at the money and valuations giving these companies that are full of copyright violations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wait till somebody like Getty goes after them for displaying thousands of their celebrity photos.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/07/24/live-blogging/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_64343/#comment-6012984</link><description>We've liveblogged the Oscars for about ten years, heck, even before it was called liveblogging.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It might seem crazy considering how many viewers there are, but each year we still get email from readers in countries that don't see the broadcast until the next morning. Or a film buff caught at a shift job where they don't have TV but they do have a computer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree the process can be crazy at times, but not everyone is connected 24/7 and it can be valuable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:15:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/10/23/coolspotters/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_513351/#comment-6023896</link><description>Just looking at a few of the celebrity profiles and unless I'm mistaken, it appears that the users can submit the photos being used.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So is this yet another service that profits off the IP of photographers until such time that the photographer alerts them that their copyright is being violated?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love these companies that hide behind the "We take it down as soon as we're notified" BS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:29:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/10/23/coolspotters/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_513351/#comment-6023903</link><description>Yes, but where's the revenue on these types of sites for the photographers's work that's being stolen?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:05:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/10/23/coolspotters/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_513351/#comment-6023909</link><description>As a celebrity photographer (and no I'm NOT a paparazzi) I'm sick and tired of the DMCA shield.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Gee, they swore it wasn't stolen property. Well, look around the house and if you prove anything was yours take it back with our apologies."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I should be able to enjoy life making new work not hunting down illegal uses of past works.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO Copywriting:  Lure The &amp;#8216;Bots &amp;#8211; Don&amp;#8217;t Become One</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/seo_copywriting_lure_the_8216bots_8211_don8217t_become_one/#comment-17135413</link><description>In regards to the keyword to left issue and photo galleries I'm wondering about how far the bots go to decide a title is different?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right now if I have two photos of you at an event, the title tags generated are:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Photo 1 Mike Yanke | 15th Annual Yanke Marketing Gala&lt;br&gt;Photo 2 Mike Yanke | 15th Annual Yanke Marketing Gala&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Should I change that to say:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike Yanke | 15th Annual Yanke Marketing Gala (Photo 1)&lt;br&gt;Mike Yanke | 15th Annual Yanke Marketing Gala (Photo 2)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will a bot still go that far right to see them as different?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:27:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>