DISQUS

If this is true, then Richardson = misleading I don't know much about this deal-making stuff at caucuses, but it seems kind of dishonest and filthy to me.  Campaigns shouldn't be able to make deals that determine how the American voice will be heard.  "I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine" seems like it undermines the whole caucus process.  The individuals at a particular caucus should be able to "vote" how they want without having to be told, hey, your non-viable candidate told you to do this because then they will pay us back later, I promise.  Seems misleading by Richardson, too...what appears to be him supporting Obama is really a plot (albeit a bad one) to further his own agenda.