<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for brem</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/0090eedbf9ec8f1082552d4dce52cc8a/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:24:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sounds Like A Nice Place To Live</title><link>http://theclozing.disqus.com/sounds_like_a_nice_place_to_live/#comment-22131927</link><description>In Georgia state:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Pointless/Cities/Signs/MI-Climax.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Pointless/Cities...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Quebec:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/2004.09.07_Peace%2520to%2520the%2520Lobster/10_Only%2520in%2520Qu%25E9bec.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/2004.09.07_P...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;heheheeh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Direction Informatique Au Quebec Utilise Seesmic Pour Un "Pitch"</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/direction_informatique_au_quebec_utilise_seesmic_pour_un_pitch/#comment-4970327</link><description>Tu n'as qu'à utiliser un clavier canadien-français pour clavier QWERTY avec accents. C'est facile, c'est qu'un petit truc à modifier dans Windows :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ZADI DIAZ</title><link>http://zadi.disqus.com/zadi_diaz_6644/#comment-4513601</link><description>How did you stumble on that?!&lt;br&gt;brem</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ZADI DIAZ</title><link>http://zadi.disqus.com/zadi_diaz_6644/#comment-4515067</link><description>Cool.&lt;br&gt;I just really did not expect to hear her on your blog!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She built up a small hype in Quebec... It all started with her myspace page... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)&lt;br&gt;Happy holidays</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:06:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Speedlinking: October 19, 2006</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/speedlinking_october_19_2006/#comment-1033864</link><description>I find IE7 to not handle graphics too well. IE6 wasn't too great either... more to come...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Absentee Ballot Record</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/absentee_ballot_record/#comment-1033901</link><description>Your elections are mighty complicated in the US...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:52:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Advertisers Still Don&amp;#8217;t Get It</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/why_advertisers_still_don8217t_get_it/#comment-1033914</link><description>This is unrelated, but one thing I never understood is how some advertising companies hold on to their ads branding copyright laws when they are being copied and distributed. That's the basis for viral marketing. Why should they care that the most people see their ads? For free.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:04:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Advertisers Still Don&amp;#8217;t Get It</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/why_advertisers_still_don8217t_get_it/#comment-1033917</link><description>Both type of salesmen are needed. You need to do blind advertising, and without knowing what a potential customer needs, suggesting can sometimes pop ideas in the customer's head. However, I believe, like Aaron says, that for more straightforward type of entrepreneurs, it's not the best approach.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like in anything, one size certainly doesn't fits all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spam Issues (or why Akismet isn&amp;#8217;t proving worth the money)</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/spam_issues_or_why_akismet_isn8217t_proving_worth_the_money/#comment-1033923</link><description>Last week, I've been spam attacked. Almost 1200 spam comments in about 2-3 hours... that jammed the comments table in my mysql database, but didn't shut down the blog, fortunatly.&lt;br&gt;I use Akismet with Bad Behaviour, but I've also noticed an increase in spam that go through the filters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:25:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post Ad-Tech, Post-Election post (or How Many Times can Post be used in a Subject?)</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/post_ad_tech_post_election_post_or_how_many_times_can_post_be_used_in_a_subject/#comment-1033967</link><description>The time when the president had a free lunch is over. That's a good thing, like you said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there free Wi-Fi connections throughout LaGuardia?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:42:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post Ad-Tech, Post-Election post (or How Many Times can Post be used in a Subject?)</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/post_ad_tech_post_election_post_or_how_many_times_can_post_be_used_in_a_subject/#comment-1033969</link><description>Not too bad. But still quite pricey.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.aeroportdequebec.com/index_en.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Our local airport is now offering free wifi throughout the terminals.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It doesn't have the same traffic as NY though. Still, it's a pretty cool thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a couple of projects around the city to have free wi-fi "hot spots". Nice initiative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope the wait is not too boring. ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice flight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:01:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post Ad-Tech, Post-Election post (or How Many Times can Post be used in a Subject?)</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/post_ad_tech_post_election_post_or_how_many_times_can_post_be_used_in_a_subject/#comment-1033971</link><description>Carol: the thing though is that the U.S. is responsible for the Iraq mess, so it's its duty to fullfil its committment. Leaving Iraq the "vietnam way" is not the solution as a regime of warlords, such as what exists in Afghanistan and much of Africa would arise. And that would be very unfortunate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:42:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post Ad-Tech, Post-Election post (or How Many Times can Post be used in a Subject?)</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/post_ad_tech_post_election_post_or_how_many_times_can_post_be_used_in_a_subject/#comment-1033976</link><description>At least if 50% of the US population is not happy with the election results, you can rest assured than a much higher figure of people are relieved throughout the whole world.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for establishing some kind of watchdog. Even if it's almost 5 years too late. ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:09:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Looking to Move (Again)</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/looking_to_move_again/#comment-1034000</link><description>Hart: here in quebec city, we say Winterpeg ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But we get our fair share of snow, don't you worry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good luck, Aaron.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:40:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Darren Does Canada</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/darren_does_canada/#comment-1034111</link><description>It's not freezing yet. Plus you're in TO... it's warmer than everywhere else in Canada (minus Vancouver).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More pics!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:29:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Thought You Knew Me, but You Didn&amp;#8217;t</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/you_thought_you_knew_me_but_you_didn8217t/#comment-1034264</link><description>rotflmao at #1</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Thought You Knew Me, but You Didn&amp;#8217;t</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/you_thought_you_knew_me_but_you_didn8217t/#comment-1034266</link><description>Negative. But I would pay to see them hit on you live. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:58:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Thought You Knew Me, but You Didn&amp;#8217;t</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/you_thought_you_knew_me_but_you_didn8217t/#comment-1034260</link><description>I second the comment about Atlanta airport, although I don't know the story behind it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When MySQL Bugs Bite</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/when_mysql_bugs_bite/#comment-1034273</link><description>True that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:10:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Would You Like A &amp;#8216;Bitch Slap&amp;#8217;?</title><link>http://filmonic.disqus.com/how_would_you_like_a_8216bitch_slap8217_14/#comment-1007341</link><description>rip off faster pussycat kill kill. no interest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:16:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He really is the terminator</title><link>http://baratunde.disqus.com/he_really_is_the_terminator/#comment-1949182</link><description>Problem with that is some criminals are experts at cunning and faking it. The art of deception and manipulation is not unknown to most of them...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;brem</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sounds Like A Nice Place To Live</title><link>http://sellsius.disqus.com/sounds_like_a_nice_place_to_live/#comment-8840836</link><description>In Georgia state:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Pointless/Cities/Signs/MI-Climax.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Pointless/Cities...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Quebec:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/2004.09.07_Peace%2520to%2520the%2520Lobster/10_Only%2520in%2520Qu%25E9bec.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://dylan.mikrotron.com/Gallery/2004.09.07_P...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;heheheeh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Le Web 3: Recap</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/le_web_3_recap/#comment-1775804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;À cause de sa critique de Loïc? Pas gloups ça.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:31:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Le Web 3: Recap</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/le_web_3_recap/#comment-1775807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ouais, j'ai lu ensuite. Ça semble être un conflit de personalité entre Arrington et Sam que le "asshole" de Loic a fait éclater au grand jour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;bah...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Là je trouve simplement que Loic est trop silencieux...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ce soir, Bloggy Friday</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/ce_soir_bloggy_friday/#comment-1776027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tiens, nous aussi c'est &lt;a href="http://www.martinbreton.com/2007/02/01/45nord-rappel-reminder/" rel="nofollow"&gt;aujourd'hui notre bloggyfriday :P&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;La prochaine fois on se le fait en duplex? :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:35:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlogCamp: Multilingual Blogging Session</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/blogcamp_multilingual_blogging_session/#comment-1776304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm one of the courageous twos :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;nice blog entry. I might blog about this... when I get around to it :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video: BBC Interview (Teenagers, Facebook)</title><link>http://ctts.disqus.com/video_bbc_interview_teenagers_facebook/#comment-1776502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are much more effective ways to stalk on your kids...&lt;br&gt;(pyscho music).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice to hear your voice :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:35:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amanda &amp;#8220;unBoomed&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/amanda_8220unboomed8221/#comment-9644273</link><description>I suggested her to take a couple of weeks of vacation to clear her head of all theses things... I've experienced an unhappy departure from my workplace a few years ago, and I know how mixed up one can feel emotionally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When she comes back online, she'll rock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And be it on podtech or anywhere else, she'll be fine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the meantime, let's wish both Andrew and Amanda the best of luck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;brem of &lt;a href="http://martinbreton.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;martinbreton.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Sometimes a courtesy flush is necessary&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/8220sometimes_a_courtesy_flush_is_necessary8221/#comment-9646723</link><description>I think plumbing is very geeky.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Ozzie doesn&amp;#8217;t think the Web is the be all and end all</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_ozzie_doesn8217t_think_the_web_is_the_be_all_and_end_all/#comment-9647350</link><description>Robert: I loved and hated Outlook.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I loved it for its integrated feature with mail, appointments, post-it, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hated it for it's awkward dialogs, especially for options... you know... go in options, advanced options, advanced options options, parameters tab....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hated it...for having integrated that virus called Visual Basic For Applications...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was a good enough reason for me to NOT use Outlook outside of the corporate world.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:51:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Ozzie doesn&amp;#8217;t think the Web is the be all and end all</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_ozzie_doesn8217t_think_the_web_is_the_be_all_and_end_all/#comment-9647349</link><description>Oh, and about the main topic, to me Second Life is a cute gimmick. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:53:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McLaws is right on Windows Vista ship date</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/mclaws_is_right_on_windows_vista_ship_date/#comment-9647575</link><description>Cody, MS is not designing Vista with you in mind, obviously, and their market is mostly "everybody else"... ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:12:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blip.tv hooks up with CNN for your videos</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/bliptv_hooks_up_with_cnn_for_your_videos/#comment-9647630</link><description>blip.tv doesn't have embedded feature, or does it now?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:08:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big conferences are dead&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/big_conferences_are_dead8230/#comment-9647662</link><description>what about all the booth babes?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big conferences are dead&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/big_conferences_are_dead8230/#comment-9647658</link><description>When the NAB conference dies, I'll believe it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big conferences are dead&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/big_conferences_are_dead8230/#comment-9647655</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.nabshow.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nabshow.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big conferences are dead&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/big_conferences_are_dead8230/#comment-9647657</link><description>John: That's not why these conferences are held. They are held because there is an exhibition attached, and it's an opportunity for face to face contact with possible customers, clients, business partners. That's all, and all of them being in one place is very convenient and cost effective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conferences are only an added value. Should they not be held, no big loss in my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:52:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videoblogger jailed</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/videoblogger_jailed/#comment-9647920</link><description>Isn't that fighting for the sole principle? Cause honestly, what else does he have to win in keeping these videos from the feds?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or rather, what does he have to lose?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time lists its 50 coolest Web sites</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/time_lists_its_50_coolest_web_sites/#comment-9648707</link><description>I don't even know one fifth of these websites... congratulations to cute overload for making the cut. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:38:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HelloWorld to take on YouTube? Nope says &amp;#8220;BlinkTest&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/helloworld_to_take_on_youtube_nope_says_8220blinktest8221/#comment-9648943</link><description>Sites like Atomfilm and iFilm are 5 years behind as far as ease of use is concerned. Why do we have to click on a button for a popup to appear then choose our preferences, over and over again, then watch ads, for a mere 30 seconds video?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:42:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog reading tips</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/blog_reading_tips/#comment-9648981</link><description>Don't subscribe to too many blogs or your life will suffer would be my tip. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:05:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blog counting game</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_blog_counting_game/#comment-9649633</link><description>The most number of blogs doesn'T really matter to advertisers. What they want is a high number of quality, high traffic, niched blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:52:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why my ego never gets out of control&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_my_ego_never_gets_out_of_control8230/#comment-9649729</link><description>You know what, before I started blogging, before I knew of the word "blog", I would say "webpage". To me, all blogs were simply webpages, with a chronological list of articles, and comment enabled.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So in the perspective that static webpages aren't blogs, all blogs are webpages, but not all webpages are blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: E-Frontier, where is your tech support?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/e_frontier_where_is_your_tech_support/#comment-9649833</link><description>He could basically just get the crack. hehehe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We had a similar problem where I used to work. We had bought a legit copy of Maya (can I mention it? :) ) but could never get pass the overboard security features. There is a password, serial no., a serial "dongle", a server keeping track of how many copies are running, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Needless to say, we never got it to work through "legal" means. However, with the crack, it worked wonderfully. hehehehe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;brem</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OK, OK, I was wrong about blogging</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/ok_ok_i_was_wrong_about_blogging/#comment-9649855</link><description>You're such a wimp Robert!!!!!! :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You need to hold on to your opinion, defend it for God's sake!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agree to disagree, but don't just give up!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I for myself, disagree about syndication being necessary for a website to be called a blog, however, I must admit that a blog without syndication (some blogspot/blogger ones, for instance) start with a strike insofar as I'm concerned. Basically, I have so many blogs I am subscribing to, that if a blog doesn'T have syndication, I just forget them due to the sheer amount of other blogs I can read more easily.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do believe you could have added "comments" as well, as a 6th criteria.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe this need to be some kind of "if you meet at least 4 of these x criterion, you are a blog" kind of thing. What do you think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;chicken... pok pok pok lol :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photo walking with Thomas Hawk</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/photo_walking_with_thomas_hawk/#comment-9649899</link><description>Zooomr's logo is strikingly similar to Flickr's.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft fights for its reputation, where&amp;#8217;s Apple and Google?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft_fights_for_its_reputation_where8217s_apple_and_google/#comment-9649948</link><description>I think their strategy is "don't put oil on the fire" in hope the fire will extinguish by itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing I don't understand is why computer graphic artists are worshipping macs. I could understand in the 80s. not in 2006.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:13:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft helping Firefox team?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft_helping_firefox_team/#comment-9650012</link><description>Somehow, it doesn't compute in my mind. Unless MS wants to ditch IE eventually... or base it on Firefox in a future iteration.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:17:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft helping Firefox team?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft_helping_firefox_team/#comment-9650018</link><description>Tim: I fail to see how helping Firefox get better will help the IE team. I can see how it can help MS as a whole, but that's like fixing the roof of a house while the foundation is rotting. If you catch my drift.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:53:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft helping Firefox team?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft_helping_firefox_team/#comment-9650026</link><description>Robert: doesn't the IE team resent their "bosses" for courting with Firefox? Surely the manager cannot be too happy about that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:33:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Feedless bloggers frustrate</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/feedless_bloggers_frustrate/#comment-9650229</link><description>duly noted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:41:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s Google in the conversation?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/where8217s_google_in_the_conversation/#comment-9650403</link><description>I have to agree with J that at least Google understood that quality matters quicker than Microsoft did.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:54:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s Google in the conversation?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/where8217s_google_in_the_conversation/#comment-9650407</link><description>What about Google earth, Google maps, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They are top notch apps.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First 16 hours of IE 7 RC 1</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/first_16_hours_of_ie_7_rc_1/#comment-9650849</link><description>A good thing with the new IE7 RC is that it is more W3C compliant than the previous version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, what ticks me off is the Microsoft attitude, as we can see through this sentence taken on the msdn blog:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712830.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/22/712...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;quote: « The only way for us to continue to improve our standards support is to get your help in changing your sites for IE7.»&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;well, why don't you guys just respect the already established standards? Then we won't have to change our sites for IE7.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sheesh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Typical. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:43:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First 16 hours of IE 7 RC 1</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/first_16_hours_of_ie_7_rc_1/#comment-9650842</link><description>what ticks me off is that pompous attitude of telling other what to do. If anything, why doesn't this website I referenced to tell people to read xhtml books and render their websites w3c compliant? No. Instead, they say: make sure they work for IE7.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, if it's news to the IE7 team, Safari is already pretty W3C compliant and Firefox is pretty darn good at it too. IE7 should have been compliant by now. This is to show how slow moving Microsoft has become. Innovation? no. Renovation. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:04:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ex-Rocketboomer partners with PopURLs</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/ex_rocketboomer_partners_with_popurls/#comment-9650977</link><description>Robert, I must admit I had no idea what Amanda would be doing at popurl. she had to explain it to me on her blog. Shaky press release, but hey... it's only a press release ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:35:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ex-Rocketboomer partners with PopURLs</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/ex_rocketboomer_partners_with_popurls/#comment-9650979</link><description>Robert: in life, not everything is about maximizing and profit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, in my life it isn't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that why I'm poor? hehe</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:27:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yes, Amanda, we&amp;#8217;re watching you!</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/yes_amanda_we8217re_watching_you/#comment-9651211</link><description>LayZ: You're being mean.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scoble: I agree with your comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogger says &amp;#8220;it&amp;#8217;s OK to steal, if they use RSS&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/blogger_says_8220it8217s_ok_to_steal_if_they_use_rss8221/#comment-9651305</link><description>Right on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:03:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I thought Google was a search company&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/i_thought_google_was_a_search_company8230/#comment-9651402</link><description>I've never really trusted Google to be the search engine with the most up to date data. Technorati is blog oriented, therefore, when I want to know right now what happens on the blogosphere, that's where I'll head to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google acquiring Technorati? Would be a sensible move. Maybe Google could straighten the loose part of Technorati. Namely a shaky reliability of their database.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:33:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloggers have a double standard when it comes to Google vs. Microsoft?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/bloggers_have_a_double_standard_when_it_comes_to_google_vs_microsoft/#comment-9651473</link><description>I remember when .NET was very fuzzy. Yet, people didn't really buy the hype.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a real art to sell vaporware.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP has major ethical problem, day 3</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/hp_has_major_ethical_problem_day_3/#comment-9652855</link><description>HP has had ethical issues since their very beginning, stealing patent ideas from inventors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:05:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is this Amanda&amp;#8217;s next big video project?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/is_this_amanda8217s_next_big_video_project/#comment-9653878</link><description>I hope she doesn't stay in the U.S.A... Canada exists too!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:16:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP has major ethical problem, day 16</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/hp_has_major_ethical_problem_day_16/#comment-9654251</link><description>Why doesn't the board members just leave with a huge bonus? (sarcasm intended).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ScobleShow post mortem (wow, Ask blog search rocks!)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/scobleshow_post_mortem_wow_ask_blog_search_rocks/#comment-9655021</link><description>Hey, I'm not on the list of future interviewees :( hehe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about the Zeeeeeeeee ?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:03:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google acquires YouTube for $1.65 billion</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_acquires_youtube_for_165_billion/#comment-9655807</link><description>Billions... not Millions...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I so wish I had started YouTube myself now... *sigh*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google acquires YouTube for $1.65 billion</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_acquires_youtube_for_165_billion/#comment-9655800</link><description>So what's your take on Cuban's opposite view? Where is he wrong? :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google acquires YouTube for $1.65 billion</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_acquires_youtube_for_165_billion/#comment-9655794</link><description>Robert: I agree with you (I don't know about Cuban being jealous or not... I know I'm jealous of his millions personally hehe).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Basically, I see it as Google deciding not to keep investing tons of money for Google Video becoming "better" than YouTube, an almost impossible feat in a short term period, so basically, it meant lots of investment for a "possible" future return. With the buy, they secure both teams. For now. Basically, it was a choice of where to put the money. Google Videos? YouTube. No brainer here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, I don't know about numbers. Is it too much? well... when we go beyond millions, it's kind of hard to grasp value. Don't you agree?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I was a YouTube employee or owner, I'd feel damn great today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft&amp;#8217;s search a lot better than it used to be</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/microsoft8217s_search_a_lot_better_than_it_used_to_be/#comment-9656284</link><description>No.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Microsoft is then what... 5, 10 years behind still?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, Microsoft has a tendency to want to cram as much info in a page as possible, whereas, Google has a minimalistic approach.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me to switch to ANY other search engine, it would have to offer something more, which it doesn't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, Google is the defacto standard. Nobody cares about other search engines anymore.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:50:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 just released</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/ie_7_just_released/#comment-9657005</link><description>(or not) ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:11:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox vs. IE 7 (IE7 having trouble with Google sites?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/firefox_vs_ie_7_ie7_having_trouble_with_google_sites/#comment-9657055</link><description>Security flaw:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20061019/tc_pcworld/127564" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20061019/tc_pcw...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IE 7 just released</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/ie_7_just_released/#comment-9657007</link><description>It does on the IE7 I just downloaded 15 minutes ago.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google reverses course on Ze Frank</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_reverses_course_on_ze_frank/#comment-9657772</link><description>Google is getting too big for its own good. It is stumbling with its own policies. Time for a swipe?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:03:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New audience metric needed: engagement</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/new_audience_metric_needed_engagement/#comment-9657969</link><description>whoa... one of your best posts in a long time.&lt;br&gt;indeed, it's hard to parametrize an audience, but I think engagement is definitly something to be measure more accurately for marketers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:50:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple blogger calls &amp;#34;bullshit&amp;#34; on me</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/apple_blogger_calls_34bullshit34_on_me/#comment-9658435</link><description>exactly. it's their business. too bad for them and apple users. It's their choice in the end. Who's to tell who's right or wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I love Maryam</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_i_love_maryam/#comment-9658950</link><description>ahw...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In TechMeme for only 50 seconds (Update: or more)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/in_techmeme_for_only_50_seconds_update_or_more/#comment-9664083</link><description>When a single individual starts to decide for the masses, isn't that what we call an autocrat? :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:32:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why bash Microsoft and not Nokia?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/why_bash_microsoft_and_not_nokia/#comment-9665532</link><description>I'm such a whore, give me goodies!!!1</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raising a stink doesn&amp;#8217;t bring the traffic</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/raising_a_stink_doesn8217t_bring_the_traffic/#comment-9668825</link><description>Maybe you saturated your niche.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, send some traffic my way if you feel so enclined ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:30:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best recovery from a failing demo</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/best_recovery_from_a_failing_demo/#comment-9669482</link><description>Don't you hate when that happens.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Won't people learn to try their stuff beforehand? :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best recovery from a failing demo</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/best_recovery_from_a_failing_demo/#comment-9669481</link><description>Robert: Most technical issues can be dealt with if you run tests on-place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand it's not always possible to try before doing a "public" demo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, when you plug and pray, Murphy's Law is usually about to strike.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And might I add, especially when it comes to Computer Vision (my field of expertise), the environment you use the equipment with is very important. A change in the use of fluorescent (blue tinted vs. red tinted for example) can result in the algorithms to not work anymore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyhoo... their stuff is neat nonetheless. ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:13:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ScobleShow goes to Seattle and Vancouver&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/scobleshow_goes_to_seattle_and_vancouver8230/#comment-9670555</link><description>Say hello to Darren Barefoot from me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:00:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From farts to diamonds</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/from_farts_to_diamonds/#comment-9699809</link><description>Why don'T they use the diamonds piling up in the vaults of that company... you know... THAT company.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:24:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PIRATE D'AMOUR</title><link>http://piratedamour.disqus.com/pirate_damour_494/#comment-17038432</link><description>La série est un peu inégale, je trouve que leurs suspenses de fin d'épisodes est trop souvent cliché, mais à chaque semaine je veux voir l'épisode, donc ça doit avoir un certain sex-appeal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ça n'accotte pas les Sopranos ou la 1ere saison de Dexter, ni Californication, mais c'est mieux que bien des séries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Enjoy</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1. Outils de campagne : Des partis et des tâches</title><link>http://ywilliams.disqus.com/1_outils_de_campagne_des_partis_et_des_taches/#comment-19624323</link><description>Tu es donc devenu membre de tous les partis? :) Que va dire l'impôt pour tes déductions? :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question, monsieur le DGE&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://ywilliams.disqus.com/question_monsieur_le_dge8230/#comment-19624330</link><description>Le débat des chefs n'a rien à voir avec le DGE, c'est avec le consortium des diffuseurs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:28:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2. Outils de campagne: La langue des élections</title><link>http://ywilliams.disqus.com/2_outils_de_campagne_la_langue_des_elections/#comment-19624346</link><description>Les anglophones ne font pas partie du débat, parce qu'ils votent Libéral, par défaut. L'ADQ aurait tout à gagner à faire connaître sa plate-forme à la communauté anglophone, mais il aurait fallu qu'ils y pensent avant. Moi-même, ayant un blogue bilingue, je dois dire que ce n'est pas évident, surtout pour l'infrastructure requise pour soutenir les deux langues. La solution la plus rapide qu'ils auraient dû faire c'est de carrément faire un 2e site, et traduire tout. Mais pas une mince entreprise. Cependant, l'ADQ va concentrer ses efforts sur le région de Québec, et ici, la communauté anglophone est bilingue par obligation, donc on ne fait pas d'efforts pour leur fournir de la documentation en anglais.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:54:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Suivre le débat en ligne, ce soir</title><link>http://ywilliams.disqus.com/suivre_le_debat_en_ligne_ce_soir/#comment-19624362</link><description>Ouf, pas facile... ça va vite un débat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:49:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Solde électoral</title><link>http://ywilliams.disqus.com/solde_electoral/#comment-19624369</link><description>Les trois partis ont choisi le même style de campagne? Il dormait les dernières semaines lui? :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cyberpresse .ca ou .com ?</title><link>http://ywilliams.disqus.com/cyberpresse_ca_ou_com/#comment-19624447</link><description>&lt;a href="http://cyberpress.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://cyberpress.com/&lt;/a&gt; est aussi squatté.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Comme quoi un 10$ c'est un gros investissement pour ces grosses boites lourdes et bureaucratisées.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maintenant, ça va leur coûter combien pour récupérer le nom de domaine?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Un dollar, c&amp;#8217;est un dollar!</title><link>http://ywilliams.disqus.com/un_dollar_c8217est_un_dollar/#comment-19624464</link><description>Quand j'avais 8 ans, on chantait: 1 cenne américaine vaut 2 cennes!!!! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brem</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:31:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>