<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for millenomi</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/0025c0be1dfeead2738f27fec07d539b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:22:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TouchCode Usage</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.disqus.com/touchcode_usage/#comment-1656138</link><description>Except, the NDA is *NOT* lifted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What are we to do now? :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">millenomi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:48:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using the LLVM/Clang Static Analyzer for iPhone apps</title><link>http://basilshkara.disqus.com/using_the_llvmclang_static_analyzer_for_iphone_apps/#comment-8048999</link><description>Or use scan-build -k xcodebuild -configuration Debug -sdk iphonesimulator2.2 rather than changing the project :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">millenomi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Embracing Encapsulation</title><link>http://terrycojonesfluidinfo.disqus.com/embracing_encapsulation/#comment-16328066</link><description>(I apologize in advance for not reading the assuredly fine comments above mine.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still think the programming world has a need for high-level application programmers and low-level system programmers for a very very simple reason: while digital clocks replace analog clocks, we don't have high-performance processors that are able to think in high-level abstractions. Python still needs C because there's no Python CPU, the same way C must first be compiled in machine code by a good compiler because there is no CPU able to read C and make sense of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The maxim goes: write the app and then optimize it -- do not optimize prematurely. Which is really something that should read: write the app in a way that is easy to read and follow for an external party and overall makes sense, and then you dive down and spend time with the implementation of your concepts to see if it lives down  to your speed requirements. High-level languages that offer some functionality "crystallized" in a library are a barrier to this, as after you have made the app as good as you can, the library then becomes the bottleneck, and if it's still an unacceptable bottleneck you have to get down a level and start messing around with the library's internals, if you can (long live FOSS!).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which, in two words, means: there's a very fine place for both kinds of programmers in this brave new world. Neither makes the other obsolete.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">millenomi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:27:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A volte&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://deadmanwriting.disqus.com/a_volte8230/#comment-17839711</link><description>C'è da qualche parte, immagino, voglia di imitare quelli che, nelle divisioni più in vista, lo fanno ogni domenica.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chissà.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">millenomi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:01:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mi dissocio</title><link>http://deadmanwriting.disqus.com/mi_dissocio/#comment-17839766</link><description>Needs a teleporter there! [/quote]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">millenomi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>