<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for benson</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/00027ece014f64ac0b182e3a10003784/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hug a flag&amp;#8230; it&amp;#8217;s Constitution Day!</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/hug_a_flag8230_it8217s_constitution_day/#comment-2502709</link><description>Yea Constitution Day! :)  Can I get a hell yeah?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A voice against nuclear energy</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/a_voice_against_nuclear_energy/#comment-2502681</link><description>Joma, don't forget "no wind farms off the California coast or anywhere on the Atlantic coast that would 'ruin' Teddy Kennedy's pristine view."  For the big energy problems going on right now and in the future, there are a lot of "just say no..." views out there.  No nukes, no additional drilling (which still won't provide any relief for ten years.  What a shock to find out people were saying this ten years ago), no to renewables (right wingers and Teddy Kennedy's coastline).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But thank God we have an ad.  An ad that screams "We demand 100% clean energy in 10 years!" with not much else to it.  It's like we can just click our heels and magically make it happen. I've got it!  This is a "faith-based energy policy!"  Now it all makes sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shrayas, where did you get that data on the cost of disposal cost of the fuel?  Because speaking with a nuclear scientist at UNM, the disposal cost of the fuel rods didn't approach that number.  And somehow, I don't think the French are spending $1B on handling and disposal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ഫാ. അടപ്പൂരാന്, സ്വന്തം കമ്പി ഓമനക്കുട്ടന്‍ !</title><link>http://berlytharangal.disqus.com/thread_71/#comment-7570414</link><description>സിസ്റ്റര്‍ അഭയയെ വിശുദ്ധ ആയി പ്രഗ്ഗ്യപിക്കണം</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ഫാ. അടപ്പൂരാന്, സ്വന്തം കമ്പി ഓമനക്കുട്ടന്‍ !</title><link>http://berlytharangal.disqus.com/thread_186/#comment-7659418</link><description>സിസ്റ്റര്‍ അഭയയെ വിശുദ്ധ ആയി പ്രഗ്ഗ്യപിക്കണം</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ഫാ. അടപ്പൂരാന്, സ്വന്തം കമ്പി ഓമനക്കുട്ടന്‍ !</title><link>http://berlytharangalcomments.disqus.com/thread_1757/#comment-7656951</link><description>സിസ്റ്റര്‍ അഭയയെ വിശുദ്ധ ആയി പ്രഗ്ഗ്യപിക്കണം</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://berlythomas.blogspot.com/2008/11/blog-post_26.html</title><link>http://berlytharangalcomments.disqus.com/httpberlythomasblogspotcom200811blog_post_26html/#comment-18327993</link><description>സിസ്റ്റര്‍ അഭയയെ വിശുദ്ധ ആയി പ്രഗ്ഗ്യപിക്കണം</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.dailyautocad.com/2007/03/private-detective-in-architectural.html</title><link>http://dailyautocad.disqus.com/httpwwwdailyautocadcom200703private_detective_in_architecturalhtml/#comment-18552953</link><description>Is there a way to modify the reported properties that are displayed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 05:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.dailyautocad.com/2007/03/autocad-2007-and-view-command.html</title><link>http://dailyautocad.disqus.com/httpwwwdailyautocadcom200703autocad_2007_and_view_commandhtml/#comment-18552996</link><description>It is also worth noting that to make a rendering with a white background in 2007 you need to set the background color to 255,255,255 on a set view.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:49:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.dailyautocad.com/2007/02/live-section-in-autocad-2007-i.html</title><link>http://dailyautocad.disqus.com/httpwwwdailyautocadcom200702live_section_in_autocad_2007_ihtml/#comment-18553046</link><description>This works similar to the ADT AECHORIZONTALSECTION or AECVERTICALSECTION commands.  The advantage of ADT is that these commands work through XRefs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:10:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>