<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for pedroteixeira</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/pedroteixeira/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/pedroteixeira/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:03:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spring Framework RCE, Early Announcement</title><link>https://spring.io/blog/2022/03/31/spring-framework-rce-early-announcement#comment-5812787483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On the workaround, can we avoid creating new array `denylist` for each http request? any reason why is it not shared? (afaik, field is private in DataBinder.class and it doesn't mutate it)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pedroteixeira</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Per-request Query Caching in Django</title><link>http://localhost:4000/blog/2013/01/17/caching-selects-per-request-django.html#comment-1278562367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess you should also add (so it does not break tests code, for ex)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;def process_response(self, request, response):&lt;br&gt;   if hasattr(SQLCompiler, '_execute_sql'):&lt;br&gt;      SQLCompiler.execute_sql = SQLCompiler._execute_sql&lt;br&gt;  return response&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pedroteixeira</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:22:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James on Software | Observational: Better Observers for ActiveRecord</title><link>http://jamesgolick.com/2009/8/5/observational-better-observers-for-activerecord.html#comment-16799047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;cool. I'll let you know if I manage to find out :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pedroteixeira</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James on Software | Observational: Better Observers for ActiveRecord</title><link>http://jamesgolick.com/2009/8/5/observational-better-observers-for-activerecord.html#comment-16580114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does it handle callbacks on has_many collections, such as after_remove?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pedroteixeira</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:16:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>