<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for paulcjeff</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/paulcjeff/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/paulcjeff/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:02:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Some bomb parcels made to look like mailing, reports say</title><link>https://www.linns.com/news/postal-updates/2018/october/bomb-parcels-to-look-like-mailing.html#comment-4165706575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Don’t Want To Force Anyone To Bake A Cake For My Gay Wedding</title><link>http://thefederalist.com/2017/12/05/dont-want-force-anyone-bake-cake-gay-wedding/#comment-3653731665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly!  Let the customers decide.  Whether it's a bake shop or an airline, let the customers speak with their buying power by boycotting.  Then, if enough people agree, the business will suffer.  Then they will have to decide what's more important.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 22:39:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Has No Answer On Cruz Question | The Daily Caller</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/19/cruz-asks-bernie-what-the-difference-is-between-democrat-and-socialists-on-taxes-video/#comment-3579550816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I don't understand is that the tax rate in these countries is 65%, but Bernie and his wife only paid an effective tax rate of 13% (less than my effective tax rate, who earned far less than he) on a combined income of $200,000.  Sounds like he and his wife owe another 52% ($104,000).  Or is this like Obamacare, where he and his Washington Democratic cronies are illegally excluded from the horrendous laws they impose on us?  Nice to know we have a new ruling class.  Instead of kings and queens, we have Democratic politicians imposing laws on us while flaunting them themselves.  Why did we even have a Revolutionary War over 200 years ago? At least the British monarchs didn't hide their disgust for the people.  These guys act like they care about us, which is obviously a lie.  No wonder the Democratic Party is dying.  Good riddance!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:34:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Quds March goes ahead in London, Hezbollah flags and all</title><link>https://worldisraelnews.com/al-quds-march-goes-ahead-london-hezbollah-flags/#comment-3370575157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If these Muslim Fascists were wearing brown shirts and swastikas, would London be so "tolerant"?  And clearly, Islam is worse than Nazism.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dennis Prager, Adam Carolla: Let Kathy Griffin Say What She (Guest Column) </title><link>http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/dennis-prager-adam-carolla-let-kathy-griffin-say-what-she-guest-column-1010288#comment-3344036176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tea-baggers?  So now it's okay to use derogatory, anti-homosexual terms for people with whom you disagree?  Why not just call them the "n-word" or racist, derogatory words for Jews, Hispanics or Asians?  It's obvious your argument is without merit and that's why you have to resort to bigoted language.  Thanks for proving yourself wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 03:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dennis Prager, Adam Carolla: Let Kathy Griffin Say What She (Guest Column) </title><link>http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/dennis-prager-adam-carolla-let-kathy-griffin-say-what-she-guest-column-1010288#comment-3344030354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hate to disagree Dennis, but this is different.  Threatening the life of the President, is illegal and immoral, regardless of who the President is (even Obama).  Even doing something like this to Hillary would be wrong and illegal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 03:19:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Turns Out Trump Can&amp;#8217;t Just Pull the U.S. Out of the Paris Accord Today</title><link>http://secondnexus.com/politics-and-economics/trump-cant-just-pull-out-paris-accord/#comment-3339342342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2 bans (1 being struck down twice) and they weren't Muslim bans as 85% of the world's Muslims are exempt.  Additionally, the nations were selected by our former (Democrat) President.  So, our former President must be the idiot, as you say.  No disagreement here.  Also, it wasn't our judicial system but 3 federal judges acting as mini-Supreme Courts, which should be illegal (in fact, some in Congress are working to rein in these out-of-control judges, and it WILL change), all appointed by our former President.  A federal judge does NOT have the authority to interpret federal laws or Presidential orders.  That is solely reserved to the one and only Supreme Court.  If this were a conservative federal judge striking down the Social Security Act or Medicare/Medicaid or Obamacare or some other federal law liberals find important (like Roe v. Wade?), I think you'd feel differently.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It Turns Out Trump Can&amp;#8217;t Just Pull the U.S. Out of the Paris Accord Today</title><link>http://secondnexus.com/politics-and-economics/trump-cant-just-pull-out-paris-accord/#comment-3339328194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it's voluntary and non-binding, then it's voluntary and non-binding, which means we don't have to follow it nor participate.  Just what, pray tell, does voluntary and non-bonding mean if it means we're not allowed to ignore it?  And why are China and India, the world's 2 largest polluters, exempt?  I might support this if all the Americans who support this were required to give up everything they own:  their IRAs, cars, houses, electricity, running water, indoor plumbing, health care, air conditioners, clothing etc. and all the other accoutrements and were forced to hunt for their own food and clothing (without guns, of course).  But, of course, that will never happen. Giving things up, doing without and deprivation is only for the little people (poor, middle class, minorities, etc.), not the rich liberals.  It's just like taxes.  Did Bernie Sanders or any Democrats pay 50% income tax?  No!  He only paid 13%.  Again, 50% is only for the little people, not for rich, white liberals.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:22:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christian missionaries in Aleppo crucified and beheaded</title><link>http://archbishopcranmer.com/christian-missionaries-aleppo-crucified-beheaded/#comment-2960246822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wait a minute.  Christians being tortured, beheaded and crucified?  Females being raped?  Did the article say this happened in Aleppo, SYRIA?  Isn't that the same country where the SYRIAN refugees are from?  And Trump is criticized for wanting them to be vetted first?  Maybe Hillary and Obama would like to see this happening is the USA.  I guess they figure they'll be safe.  After all, no one with any brains would confuse them for being Christians or in the case of Hillary, for being a female.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:26:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Not? &amp;#8212; ‘Like Racism Thing’</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/12/29/steyn-why-is-bill-cosby-finished-while-bill-clinton-is-not-like-racism-thing/#comment-2924922586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It should be obvious.  The DemoKKKrats (always remember:  the Klan was started by the Democratic Party) don't like black people who get too uppity like Bill Cosby.  They prefer obedience from inferiors, like they get from Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Obummer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:45:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huckabee Hyperbole: &amp;#039;Coach, I Think I&amp;#039;d Rather Shower With The Girls Today&amp;#039;</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/huckabee-hyperbole-coach-i-think-id-rather-shower-girls-today#comment-2061230447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree with Governor Huckabee.  When I was in highschool, I was called a f*g and q**r by the football players,  basketball players and wrestlers all because I did not play their gay sports.  They told me more than once that I should go get my d**k cut off and go play dolls with the girls.  I would have LOVED taking showers with the girls instead of the boys.  I have ALWAYS preferred females to males.  And to think, I could have had all this fun without even having to be castrated, by just declaring myself a girl.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 01:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saint Louis University Removes Statue of Priest Blessing Native Americans</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/saint-louis-university-removes-statue-priest-blessing-native-americans#comment-2055474844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your confirmation of how stupid we've become in this country.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2015 21:17:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saint Louis University Removes Statue of Priest Blessing Native Americans</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/saint-louis-university-removes-statue-priest-blessing-native-americans#comment-2052917189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am offended by the name "Saint" in the name of the city.  Not only is it white, Christian racism and supremacism, it's Catholic racism and supremacism.  And, it violates "separation of church and state."  So, the city should be called Louis.  And, while we're at it, let's change the name of Los Angeles (the angels) to Los.  And San Francisco, and San Diego and Santa Barbara and . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 03:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Viral Yearbook Quote Calls Attention to Feminism, LGBT, Equal Pay</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/viral-yearbook-quote-calls-attention-feminism-lgbt-equal-pay#comment-2052910131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll tell you why she won't earn as much as a man.  It's because she has no math skills.  First of all if it's 75, it's CENTS, not CENT.  And .75 cents is 3/4 of 1 cent, less than a penny.  If anything it should be $.75, not .75 cent (or cents).  That's why you'll earn less than a man.  If .75 cents = $.75, then I guess 5 cents = $5.  So, Caitlyn, lend me $5 and I'll return to you 5 cents, since they're the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 03:43:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice Kennedy Shows Division On Same-Sex &amp;#039;Marriage&amp;#039;</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/justice-kennedy-shows-division-same-sex-marriage#comment-1994359322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Only gay people?  What about lesbian people?  Oh, I forgot, lesbians are not real people.  Unless you think that lesbians are gay.  If so, then why the organization called GLAAD (Gay and LESBIAN . . .)?  Or the so-called LGBT (LESBIAN, Gay . . .) community?  Aren't those terms redundant?  Look, just admit it.  You're a sexist, woman-hating bigot who refuses to acknowledge women even exist (unless they're in their proper place [their knees or their backs].).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jindal Throws Down Gauntlet For Religious Freedom</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/jindal-throws-down-gauntlet-religious-freedom#comment-1983861404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm glad to see you're so tolerant of "diversity" of views.  Even in "The Exorcist", the main character moves her head a full 360 degrees.  Apparently, you've forgotten to move your head back the remaining 180 degrees.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jindal Throws Down Gauntlet For Religious Freedom</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/jindal-throws-down-gauntlet-religious-freedom#comment-1983849480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really?  I guess those millions of jobs Reagan helped businesses to create by lowering their taxes must have gone to rich, white liberals then.  And the tripling of tax revenue must have come from the poor people on welfare?  Were you drunk or on drugs from 1981 to 1989?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:05:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jindal Throws Down Gauntlet For Religious Freedom</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/jindal-throws-down-gauntlet-religious-freedom#comment-1983839943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe you should pull out your sword and behead "the religious".  But, be careful and remember what goes around comes around.  Next, it will be be YOU getting beheaded.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rubio: Sexual Preference Not a Choice for Most People</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/rubio-sexual-preference-not-choice-most-people#comment-1983186708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:04:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Female Air Force Vet/Playboy Model Arrested for Stopping Flag Desecration</title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/female-air-force-vetplayboy-model-arrested-stopping-flag-desecration#comment-1981211229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;mrclassified, I just wonder if it had been an ARAB-AMERICAN MUSLIM former military woman who had done this, instead of an attractive white former military woman, what the university president would have said then?  After all, in all fairness, not ALL Muslims hate America.  If he had criticized the woman, he would have been guilty of committing "hate" speech, a "hate" crime for which he would have been arrested and sent to prison.  But, if he didn't condemn her, then he would be offending one of the favorite constituencies of liberals:  America-haters.  Or better yet,  what if these protestors had been stomping on a star and crescent or even worse, stomping on a picture of Mohammed?  What would the idiot university president have said then?  Of course, if that had happened, the Muslim students on campus would have just sent enough IEDs from their personal stores to kill all the protestors, or hijacked an airplane and flown it into the university,  killing thousands of students and others all at once.  After all, isn't that what Muslims do if they get angry?  Or maybe, what if the protestors dressed up in white hoods and sheets and burned a cross?  Or they dressed up in brown shirts and swastikas and burned a swastika, or stomped on a picture of President Obozo?  Just imagine the possibilities . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *Sarah Silverman &amp;#039;Apology&amp;#039; Blasts ‘Maniacs’ Who Doubt Pay Gap </title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/sarah-silverman-apology-blasts-maniacs-who-doubt-pay-gap#comment-1976054457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly!  Let's equalize Nancy Pelosi's $200 million net worth and mine.  I'll send my bank's routing number and my account number for  the electronic deposit.  Of course, I won't hold my breath waiting.  Liberals don't believe the rules apply to them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *Sarah Silverman &amp;#039;Apology&amp;#039; Blasts ‘Maniacs’ Who Doubt Pay Gap </title><link>http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/sarah-silverman-apology-blasts-maniacs-who-doubt-pay-gap#comment-1976033685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately for Ms. Silverman, there is NO wage gap when comparing equal experience AND equal results.  Equal pay for equal work has been the law for over 50 years.  The reason why women (allegedly) earn less than men is the same reason 20- year olds earn less than 60-year olds.  EXPERIENCE!   Let me ask a simple question.  When a married couple both work and the wife gets pregnant, sometimes they decide that one of the parents should stay home to rear the child.  Who would you think that usually is?  A stay-at-home dad or a stay-at-home mom?  While there are certainly some of the former, we all know that it's usually the latter.  Now, let's take that woman 20 or 30 years later after she has reared her last child and ask what is going to happen when she re-enters the work force.  Would it be reasonable for her to earn the same as someone (male or female) who has been working for 20 or 30 years?  Of course not!  This is, of course, not the major reason for the alleged pay gap.  The number 1 reason is that women choose lower paying careers.   Let's take the medical profession for example.  Physicians generally earn more than nurses.  The majority of nurses are female, the majority of physicians are male.  So males are going to earn more on the average than women.  This is NOT sexism, but choice.  Actually,  when comparing men and women doing the same job AND the same experience AND the same results, women earn between $.99 and $1.06 for each $1 a man earns, according to the federal government's Bureau of Labor Statistics.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 13:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 17-Year-Old Runaway Christian Convert Allowed To Stay In Florida | AHN</title><link>http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7016182470?17-Year-Old%20Runaway%20Christian%20Convert%20Allowed%20To%20Stay%20In%20Florida#comment-15299900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;suprastarr, if you are a Muslim, then you must know that, regarding the Quran, anything that appears later that contadicts what appears earlier takes precedence.  You quote Sura 2, written when Islam was a minority "religion."  When Islam came to dominate in the Middle East, tolerance went out the window.  Later on in the Quran, it calls for the annihilation of Jews and Christians.  Muslims have been mad at Jews ever since Isaac got the birthright instead of his older half-brother, Ishmael.  And they hate Christians because they think we are polytheists, because we believe in the Holy Trinity.  You are doing the same thing that many Muslims do worldwide:  hide the truth about Islam and only quote the "good" stuff.  Islam is NOT a religion of peace (with all due respect to former President George W. Bush) because first of all, it is NOT a religion any more than the KKK, Nazism or Communism are religions.  It is a philosophy of life.  Again, if you understand true Islam, you would know that Islam does not teach the concept of religion nor politics, and certainly not the separation of religion (church) and state.  For Islam, Islam and Allah is everything and everything must be "submissive" (the meaning of Islam) to Allah.  Secondly, it is most certainly NOT a philosophy of peace.  Look around the world.  Anywhere Muslims are, violence follows, even against their own people; for example Indonesia, the most populous Muslim nation in the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know, I know, Christians kill each other in Ireland, Europe (in WW2), etc.  But, it is most certainly not on the scale as Muslims, and while innocent people are sometimes killed, very SELDOM do Christians INTENTIONALLY kill the innocent (other than abortion).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:08:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 17-Year-Old Runaway Christian Convert Allowed To Stay In Florida | AHN</title><link>http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7016182470?17-Year-Old%20Runaway%20Christian%20Convert%20Allowed%20To%20Stay%20In%20Florida#comment-15299621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:49:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 17-Year-Old Runaway Christian Convert Allowed To Stay In Florida | AHN</title><link>http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7016182470?17-Year-Old%20Runaway%20Christian%20Convert%20Allowed%20To%20Stay%20In%20Florida#comment-15299534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcjeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:42:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>