Disqus - Latest Comments for paul123

Re: Is the Son of God film heresy or just a bad movie?: Notes from my #SonofOMG live tweet

paul123 — Thu, 15 May 2014 01:13:05 -0000

The only ones trying to cause division on blogs like this are (and would you believe it, some are paid Sayanim! Not even volunteers as in the good old days of the Commune) media-btrainwashed Jews, crypto-Jews, fake Jews, Khazarian-rooted proselytes (Jewish converts), or plain old political Zionist Jews who have, for the most part, bought the lie that six million 'Jews' died at the nads of the 'merciless Nazis.' In fact more than 120 million people (primarily Chinese, then Christian) were butchered and starved during the Zionist corruptions enforced through financial rigging onto the world, known as World War 1 and World War 2, and the Chinese 'revolution.' If you doubt that Zionist financing is responsible for all wars, because money is made by dividing and conquering peoples and nations, do some research of your own. Check out The Synagogue of Satan. That document is sufficient (and the associated video) to make crystal clear who and what was responsible for the wholesale murder of millions of human beings, INCLUDING innocent Jews. There is a murderous group of things (they don't deserve to be called human) working night and day to gain the entire world for themselves through deceit, treachery, and extreme violence. They will start World War 3 which they have planned decades ago; make sure you can identify the Synagogue of Satan and its members, and STOP FUNDING them. Stop buying their newspapers, TV channels, and everything they charge you for, so that they will have no power to rule over you through deceit.

Re: Is the Son of God film heresy or just a bad movie?: Notes from my #SonofOMG live tweet

paul123 — Thu, 15 May 2014 01:00:29 -0000

Don't talk bullshit. What the Palestinians were offered in the Balfour Declaration amounted to genocide by the Jews, as it does today. Of course you, being a Zionist Jew, who does not know God would support genocide. Oh, and that other historical revision that 'God' supposedly signed a lawful Title of all Palestinian lands (in fact, 'Eretz Israel' or greater Israel) to the Israelites of the Old Testament (who have no connection whatsoever with the assimilated proselytes living on the stolen land of Palestine today, who are mainly Ashkenazim Khazarians without an ounce of 'Jewish' blood in them), is just a lie. If what i say is not true, why is it that more than 500 towns, villages and cities built and owned by Palestinians in 1947 were stolen and then immediately destroyed within one year, that is, by 1948, after the Balfour Declaration was signed? If anyone reading this doesn't believe me because i am a Christian gentile, then listen to this Jewish speaker, who speaks the truth (not all Jews are liars like JGB here): http://youtu.be/PPgrDrdQKlg

Re: Is the Son of God film heresy or just a bad movie?: Notes from my #SonofOMG live tweet

paul123 — Thu, 15 May 2014 00:49:46 -0000

Of course you would say that, since you do not believe that divorce is a sin against. God. But then again, you aren't born again yet, are you Mr Henson. The writer makes an excellent point; the woman acting as Mary has chosen to divorce and is UNSUITABLE to represent Mary the Mother of Jesus, who was a virgin at her marriage and never divorced. You contradict Scripture and the Spirit of God with your answer, because no Angel would visit an unrepentant sinner. But then, you know this, right? The people that Jesus was angry with the most in the New Testament were those who supposedly held the truth of God sacred and taught people that they loved God and were close to Him; but, in reality, in their heart, they despise Him.

Re: Rant: No Singapore Embassy In Toronto!

paul123 — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:21:00 -0000

Hi Vince. I am a Canadian who is now living in Singapore. My Singaporean galfriend has refused to leave Singapore for the last seven years and come to stay with me in Canada or the UK (she came and visited me twice in the UK but refused to relocate, even though I was working there). Yet now that I am in Singapore (have been here for more than a year) she still refuses to relocate back to Canada.

She is a managemane accountant with a very good salary and I can understand her reasons for not wanting to relocate; but it has come to the point where she has made it clear that she will not move to Canada until and unless we have enough for both of us to settle down there (i.e. it is no good if both of us are looking for work). She says this, even though she has at least $200 K saved and owns her own flat in Singapore (and I also have substantial savings).

Should I marry this gal? If I do it will mean that I must accept whatever work I can find in Singapore, which may mean $1500 a month (I am sure you know that isn't a lot). Historically I have worked full-time since I was 18, usually contract or permanent work as a software Technical Writer. But apart from a good start in Singapore with a banking software firm (the job only lasted five months, unfortunately), I have had great difficulty finding anything in my field and the closest I have come to actual new earnings is the possibility of copywriting for a locally-based European MNC. I am 44 and my galfriend is now 39 and she has refused to relocate overseas for years because of her fears of insecurity; but now she is starting to say that even if we marry, we could not have children even in Singapore until and unless we can afford them (but, as I said, there is plenty of money available).

Are all Singaporean women so frustratingly insecure and focused on the '5 Cs'? My galfriend is a Christian; but her approach to life seems to be 'show me the money' rather than 'the just shall live by faith.'

What do you think? Any comments about Canuck gals (whom i found to be pleasant and coldly calculating over my 22 year stay in Canada--10 years in Toronto).

As for your rant about Singapore not having an Embassy in Canada proper. Hey, Singapore is not really a country, OK? It is smaller in population and physical size than Toronto...do you think it wants to spend (waste?) the resources required to maintain expensive foreign embassies in multiple cities, for the few Singaporeans who choose to continue to maintain strong ties to Singapore after they leave for the larger world?